Symbols: (Symbols associated with concept in its variant forms.) wise, wisdom
Base: (language/culture/time frame of inquiry) Gospel/scriptural
Etymology: AS, wis=discerning + dom=judgment
Dictionary definition:
Webster’s Collegiate: “Quality of being wise; ability to judge soundly and deal sagaciously with facts, esp. as they relate to life and conduct; discernment and judgment; discretion; sagacity.”
Oxford English: “Capacity of judging rightly in matters relating to life and conduct; soundness of judgment in the choice of means and ends. …”
5. Examples: (Examples in base on other side.)
’Tis a wise man who knows his own father. Wisdom is justified of her children.
6. Correlations
Genus: Thinking
Levels
Similar: Ethics, morality, coping
Celestial
Perfection: All wise
All wisdom comes from God
Pre-requisite (s)
Comple-ment:
Counter-feit(s)
Terrestrial
Agency
Foolishness
Sophistry, being learned
Living by rules
Concept:
Telestial
Wisdom
Living by impulse
Opposite: Insane
Perdition
Contrary: Stupidity, innocence, unable
Living to use others while feigning good
Necessary Constituents
(table above can scroll side to side)
7. Key questions: (Questions and answers to illuminate the concept. Use other side.)
What is the connection between
wisdom and ethics?
Ethics is the study of the different approaches to wisdom in the world.
How many kinds of wisdom are there?
Nearly as many as there are individuals.
8. Definition: Wisdom is the ability to achieve one’s goal at a tolerable price and never to have to look back and be sorry.
9. Examples: (Positive/negative examples to demonstrate or test concept.)
Examples: The man who built upon a
rock. The man who works hard and saves.
Non-examples: The man who built
upon sand. The man who is lazy and a spendthrift.
10. Relevance: (The difference this concept should make in my life: heart, mind, strength, might.)
There seem to be many short-run wisdoms, but only one long-term wisdom.
Preliminary draft 8 (CCR) 15 Feb. 1983 (Latest Version. Read at Women’s Conference 17 Feb. 1983) Appendix A
I. Introduction
I appreciate the opportunity to contrast in this paper the two principal rootstocks onto which are grafted the works of mankind. The good root is the Royal Law; if it nourishes our life and work, everything we touch is uplifted. The evil root is noblesse oblige; all human acts that draw nourishment from it result in degradation. Living by the Royal Law is the most difficult and most important feat which any human being can perform. Living by noblesse oblige is the counterfeit which is natural, easy, and widespread.
We shall focus the contrast between these two rootstocks by noting the difference each makes to the miseries of mankind. The catalogue of human misery is long: hunger, malnutrition, poverty, foolishness, disease, birth defects, oppression, unhappiness, ignorance, insanity, etc. Every person of conscience in this world is gripped by the enormity of this misery and seeks to alleviate it. There are only two main ways to alleviate those miseries. The two ways are the Royal Law and noblesse oblige, the feat and its counterfeit.
II. The Royal Law.
The Royal Law is the first and second great commandments as given by God to men in the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Doctrine and Covenants. The first law is that we should love the Lord our God, with all of our heart, might, mind, and strength. The second is that we should love our neighbor as our self. We shall here interpret this Royal Law in the framework of the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ. In this interpretation, we reword the first law to say that we should love, emulate, and obey our God in the exact pattern in which our Savior, Jesus Christ, loves our Father. We reword the second law to say that we should love our neighbor in the exact pattern in which our Savior loves us. Our Savior loves us by loving, emulating, and obeying the Father in all of his love for us. Thus the second law is like unto the first, and stems from it. By living these laws we may become like unto our Savior. For the Savior is our great exemplar, the high priest of our profession, the father of all those who are born again unto God. To love as he loves should be our ideal. He is the way, the truth, and the life. Only in him can salvation from sin, misery, and oppression come unto mankind. Only in him can we become like the Father.
That all mankind may know and understand the exact pattern of his love, our Savior has given to man three grand windows by which to learn of him and his ways. The first is the scriptures, which are the testimonies of dead prophets concerning how he loved. The second is the testimonies of the living prophets today who tell us how he loves. The third is the whisperings of the Holy Spirit which tells us how he will love and how we may love our God and our neighbor as he does. These three witnesses are not separable. If we search and pray until we see the unity of witness among them, we rise above our own private interpretation to a true understanding of the way of Christ. No man is saved faster than he gains this true understanding. Let us point out how the Saviors love fulfills the Royal Law.
The Savior loved our Father with all of his heart. He relinquished all of his personal desires and chose to do nothing and say nothing except that which his father instructed him to do. He loved our Father with all of his mind. He learned and believed all that the Father taught him, declining instruction from any human being. He loved our Father with all of his strength. He gave all of his energy and skill to fill completely the mission which our Father gave him, culminating in the voluntary giving up of his life. He loved the Father with all of his might. He used his priesthood power, his persuasion with men, his ability to control people, spirits, animals, plants, the waters, the earth, and the universe, to order all things exactly as the Father wanted them to be. His love was complete, perfect.
Our Savior loved our Father so because of the goodness, the righteousness, the fullness of the Father’s love for him. The Father is a perfect man. Man of Holiness is his name. He is a god of righteousness, for his only work and glory is to share all that he has with others to help them to become as happy as they can stand to be. The Father loves personally, fully, purely, with an intensity that rights every wrong, heals every wound, comforts every grief. All the perfection of soul that eternity could contain is fully represented in our Father. He is loved by every intelligent being. Our Savior, more intelligent than any of us, loved him fully, returning the fullness of his love. Thus our Savior keeps the first and great commandment.
Each of us is neighbor to the Savior. So the Savior loves us as his Father loves him. Acting under the Father’s love and instruction, the Savior loved us by volunteering to fill the Father’s plan in the council in heaven. He, our Savior, created this earth and all things in it to show forth the Father’s love to us. Because we are fallen, he shows us the way back to the Father’s presence, building a bridge for us with his own pain, spirit, and life-blood. He it is who pleads with each of us to turn from the world to love the Father. He pleads with the Father that our Father might accept our imperfect love. Our Savior tries to share with us all that the Father has given him. His ultimate hope for us is that we might turn from our sins and become one with our Father, even as he is, even as he has shown us the way, even as he loves. There is no stone in all eternity that the Savior does not turn to help us to attain our own individual greatest happiness. Thus the Savior loves us, his neighbors, just as the Father loves him. Thus he fulfills the Royal Law. Our Savior has shown us the way. It is now our turn to live the Royal Law.
We come to mortality with our minds and memories clouded over so that the choosing we do will be with our hearts, not our minds. We are born into this world with body, mind, and opportunity greater than any other creature we see. We are given a home of beauty, regularity, and abundance on this earth. we can think and feel, speak, laugh, cry, strive, and overcome. We have power to create heaven on earth; or hell.
For our Father has given us a choice. We may choose between righteousness and selfishness. To make that choice more explicit, our Father has sent our Savior to show us the way of righteousness and to witness to us of the Father’s love for us. the Father also sent Satan to intensify the way of selfishness; Satan urges and inspires us to do just as we please on this earth as long as we don’t love the Father and our neighbor as the Savior does.
Let us now summarize the truths of the Restored Gospel which highlight this mortal opportunity and the importance of the Royal Law.
“1. In God we live, move, and have our being. we are not “”natural”” creatures of the earth. Our breath, our strength, our health, our intelligence, our freedom, are all gifts of God to each of us, moment by moment. Our God is the author of all we call “”good”” in our lives. He is also the author of all we call “”evil”” in our lives.”
“2. The evil in our lives is sent from that we might clearly see the difference between good and evil. The good is sent from God that we might choose it over evil.”
“3. The great probation of this life is to see if we choose good[1] over evil only for ourselves, or do we choose it for others also. Those who choose good only for themselves are the selfish, the children of Satan. Those who choose good for others are the righteous, the children of our Savior.”
“4. The way of selfishness is easy to find. It is a broad path. To find it one only has to act naturally, to yield to whatever desire one happens to have.”
“5. The way of righteousness is difficult to find. It is a strait and narrow way. To find it one must hunger and thirst after righteousness. One must search and strive until one finds the very best way to help others.”
“6. The very best way to help others is to find the way of Christ, which is to love God and our neighbor as the Savior did. It is the Royal Law.”
“7. No human being can implement the Royal Law by his own power. That power comes only through the ordinances of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”
“8. The essence of the Gospel of Jesus Christ is to have faith in Jesus Christ. This faith is to receive direct revelation from him, to believe it, and to obey it.”
“9. What the Savior reveals is how to replace our desires for good, for ourselves and for others, with righteousness. Then instead of doing what pleases us we begin to turn to the Royal Law, to love and please the Father instead of ourselves.”
“10. As we act in faith and begin to love God with all of our heart and mind, his love begins to shower blessings upon us. A blessing is something that enables us to become more like God. Our breath, our strength, our health, our wealth, are not blessings to us until we begin to live the Royal Law through faith in Jesus Christ. If we are faithful, everything becomes a blessing to us.”
“11. If we are faithful servants of Jesus Christ, he shares with us his power through the ordinances of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Then, because we love the Father with all of our heart, might, mind, and strength, the Savior gives us the knowledge and power to love our neighbors as he loves us, to share our blessings with them.”
“12. As we share our blessings with our neighbors in his love, we bear witness of the Father’s love for them. If they hunger and thirst after righteousness, they too will learn of the Father’s love, become grateful for it, and have the opportunity to turn and to live the Royal Law themselves.”
“13. On the day of judgment, every soul will look back to his probation and acknowledge:”
” a. that he was in the hand of God at all times;”
” b. that God’s love was showered upon him; and”
” c. that his sorrow, if any, is that he did not return God’s love sooner.”
“14. If we are really interested in relieving the suffering and the miseries of mankind, here and now, we will realize that man’s resources and abilities to do so are insufficient. But Gods resources and abilities are infinite. Man does not have the understanding, the wisdom, the goodness, the strength, or the might, to solve man’s problems. But God has all the resources necessary to solve every human problem and is only waiting for men to live the Royal Law through faith in Jesus Christ so that relieving their misery would be a blessing and not a curse.”
III. Mortal examples of living the Royal Law
Moses was born into the misery of the slavery of the children of Israel in Egypt. Because God loved Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, he looked carefully after their children and saved Moses: life. He saw that Moses was raised as an Egyptian then drew him to Midian where he learned the Royal Law and the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Moses was grateful for God’s love and loved him in return. Keeping that first commandment enabled Moses then to love his neighbors, the Egyptians and Israel, as he was loved. But Moses did not pretend to the power to bless Egypt or Israel. He went to teach them of the true and living God, that each might be blessed of God if they would love him.
Moses taught the Egyptians of God and his power, and gave them a chance to serve God by letting Israel go. They chose selfishness over righteousness. Moses taught Israel of God and his power. Israel learned enough to become barely obedient, and were made free. Acting on faith in God, Israel went under the sea walls and was saved. Acting in the satanic anger of selfishness, Egypt went under the sea walls and was destroyed.
In Sinai Israel lacked water and food. Moses implored the Lord, and God sent water, manna, and meat. Their clothing did not fail, nor their shoes wear for forty years. Moses loved Israel, his neighbors, but what he gave them did not save them. He gave them his time, and his strength. He gave them witness of the true and living God. As Israel learned to love God as Moses did they were saved. Those that did not return God’s love were left in misery.
In Moses’ last great labor with Israel, the Book of Deuteronomy, he implored them to love the Lord, to keep the Royal Law. He told them of the blessings they and their children would receive for that faithfulness. He told them of the misery which would come upon them if they turned away from God and served selfishness. But Israel had rejected the higher law, the Gospel of Jesus Christ and its ordinances. The lesser law which took its place was to point their minds to the higher law but did not give them the power to live the Royal Law. Thus Israel suffered in misery down through the centuries, embracing the idea of the Royal Law but rejecting the power which made living it possible.
The Savior himself came in flesh and blood to show Israel the way. He reaffirmed the Royal Law and restored the Gospel and its ordinances. `Most’ of Israel rejected him and his Gospel, even while professing to love God, to live the Royal Law.
In these latter days the Lord has set his hand again to gather and restore Israel to the Royal Law through the preaching of the restored Gospel of Jesus Christ. He sent the Prophet Joseph to show the way. The Father and the Son loved Joseph for his faith, and Joseph loved them with all of his heart, might, mind, and strength. Through Joseph the Lord restored the Gospel message and all of the ordinances which pertain to salvation. Joseph loved his neighbors as God loved him, and sought to share his knowledge and power from God wherever it was appropriate in God for him to do so. The love of God and of the Prophet Joseph and of all others who love God continue to reach out today to invite every soul on earth to come to the feast of God’s love and partake without money or price.
To emphasize again the nature of the Royal Law we note the following. Love of the Lord must precede love of neighbor because no man of his own wisdom knows how to do what is best for his neighbor. When a person loves the Lord as the fountain of all righteousness, that fountain flows unto him as living water, so that he never hungers nor thirsts again. His gratitude for this living water is so great that he has then a great desire to share his blessings with his neighbors. He implores the Lord for guidance, then imparts of whatever riches he has according to the Lords instructions, never fearing diminution of his fountain. His fountain is endless, infinite: he knows that his personal needs will always be met as he obeys the Lord. So he gives and shares without worry, for love. He give’s and shares that his neighbor might know of the goodness of God. He knows that whatever he gives his neighbor, it is a pittance compared with the love of God that neighbor will know if the neighbor turns to love God. The purpose of the Royal Law is identical with the work and glory of God, which is to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man. Men on earth become participators with God in the grand design as they beget children to a mortality that leads to immortality and as they love their neighbors in a world full of misery in a way which presages the blessings of God. This world that abounds in misery is the handiwork of a kind and loving Father who has carefully allowed this misery that he might teach his children the true riches of time and eternity. The misery exists for two basic reasons: 1) that those who love God will have ample opportunity to share what God has given them with their less fortunate neighbors as they witness of God’s love, and 2) that-those who reject God might better realize that there are consequences for having done so here in this life as well as hereafter.
In summary, keeping the Royal Law is what every man can and should do to help to relieve the miseries of mankind. As any man keeps it, he opens the channel of godly love that flows between God and himself, and between his neighbor and himself. Thus every human misery that should be relieved will be relieved. Each will be relieved when faith in God makes that relieving a blessing. Every man who keeps the Royal Law voluntarily makes himself a servant of God and also a servant to his neighbor.
III. Noblesse Oblige
Having given a basic explanation of the Royal Law, the living of which is the greatest and most rewarding feat which any human being or god can perform, let us turn briefly to the counterfeit which is noblesse oblige. Noblesse is the French word for nobility: oblige means `oblige’. Together they mean that to be of the nobility obliges one to do good for others.
To begin our account we must make a few observations about nobility.
There is a striking propensity in every human society for people to stratify, to establish a pecking order. Almost every person who exists desired to be able to look down on someone else, anyone else. The desire to look down on someone seems to be almost as basic as the need for human company. In many people it is matched by a desire to look up to someone, a “hero” to worship. Much of what we see in human relationships is varieties of this look-up, look-down syndrome.
One outgrowth of that syndrome has been the creation of a noble caste or class in almost every society, an “in” group to which not everyone can belong. Devices which have been used to create nobility or “in” groups are: age, blood line, language spoken (e.g., French over Anglo-Saxon), clubs, clothing, priesthood, physical strength, physical prowess, education, degrees, physical possessions of land, money, technical devices (e.g., possession of a Rolls Royce), skin color, height, obesity or lack of it, etc. We see the same drive for superciliousness influencing the royalty of a country to see themselves as being far superior to commoners as we see when third- graders taunt the “kindergarten babies.” For many people, success in this world is just having someone to look down upon. This is a worldwide psychological Ponzi scheme to live psychologically high the expense of those at the bottom of the social pyramid. We note that the nobility are self-appointed. Their noble line began in case when some ancestor had power, either military or economically monopoly power, and through that power obtained holdings that ensure family wealth. Family wealth has been exploited to differentiate the noble family from others in perpetuity.
Because they believe they are nobler, thus better than whoever else is beneath them in the social pyramid, the nobility believe they have obligations to make up for the deficiencies of the “great uneasy” Because their actions are typical and world-wide, we will focus on the obligations which historically have attached to the nobility of Europe.
The first obligation is to maintain a clear line of difference between themselves and their inferiors. They are obliged to do this because they perceive that the world would be worse off if they were not true and loyal to the inherent betterness of their class. Devices used to institutionalize that line of difference are:
a. Distinctive dress, speech, gracious manners, and demeanor in all public appearances. This is what they call “breeding.”
b. Fostering differential and deferential behavior in their underlings; such as bowing, kneeling, sitting lower than, saying “sir” and “maam.”
c. Controlling their public image by getting the “right reports of their being seen and being mentioned at “right” occasions.”
d. Recognizing and making much of each other.
e. Total avoidance of productive manual labor. That would utterly disgrace them.
f. The need to appear to be affluent even if the family fortune has fallen on hard times.
The second obligation is to be influential in government to protect the interest of the “people,” the community, the nation. They do this by wielding “influence” in whatever government currently stands. Should the government be threatened and military force become necessary or expedient they, because of their inherently super wisdom and because of their breeding, always become the officers. They seize the government for themselves, where possible.
A third obligation is the need to support “fine art.” Fine art is the art of the medieval court. If they, the nobility, did not support it, it would die, since the masses have little taste for it. So it is the obligation of the nobility to support opera and ballet companies, symphony orchestras, art museums, etc., in order to preserve what is “noble” in art for the benefit of all mankind.
(Note: Their support of science is a practical matter, science has commercial and military technical applications which make its support necessary. But because fine art is not in the same sense necessary, voluntary support of fine art is a truer test of “nobility than is support of science.)
A fourth obligation of the nobility is the need to be charitable, be involved in good causes to help the poor. This obligation manifest in three main ways:
a. They support charitable organizations which engage in the immediate physical relief to the suffering, such as hospitals, and soup kitchens.
b. They support government welfare programs which will maintain the quietness and steadiness of the masses to be ready to serve in the military or in industrial enterprises should the need for their labor arise.
c. They support compulsory public education so that the masses will be sufficiently educated that they can serve well in the military and industrial occasions of the society. Professional training of the brightest persons is essential so that they can run the government bureaucracies, the military organizations and the industrial complies with greater efficiency.
Thus do the nobility preserve their status and fortunes.
The occupations of the nobility traditionally were war and government. Now they are war, government, and business. Part of their success (that not due to their power and wealth) has been due to the mystique which they have engendered about themselves. Non-nobility traditionally look Lip to the nobility as the wisest, the bravest, the best of persons. The never-never land of all fairy tales and romantic literature is for some low-born person to join the nobility and live happily ever after. Low-born persons, not esteeming themselves, attempt to imitate the speech, the dress, the sports, the vacations of the nobility. When a low-born person gets wealth, he often will immediately seek to acquire the eternal trappings of the nobility and will try to join them. If his son or daughter can marry someone of “noble” blood, he has succeeded. But the nobility resist penetration. They are careful to count as “their own” only pedigreed persons of ancient wealth; interlopers are disdainfully regarded as nouveau riches (the newly rich).
An interesting application of the nobility mystique is seen at the wedding receptions in our own LDS culture. Not esteeming ourselves because we believe we are not nobility, LDS families seize upon this one special occasion to become kings and queens, knights and dukes, for a day. We rent the tuxedo trappings of the nobility and parade before all of our family and friends in the accoutrements of the “noble” rich to make the occasion “very special,” to be somebody. But of course we do homage in other ways, such as buying designer clothes, desiring the “right” kind of automobile, desiring to live as high on the hill as possible, etc.
An historic example will help to clarify the meaning of what we are saying as to the pervasive nature of the “nobility” frame of mind and its obligations. In the 19th Century, Tsarist Russia was a typical European kingdom ruled by a nobility which fitted the general descriptions given above. During the second half of the century (1861-1907), in response to great internal pressure, reforms were undertaken to abolish serfdom and to institute some representative government. But the outrageous inequity and inefficiency of the government as run by the nobility forced the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II in 1917.
In the power struggle which ensued, the Bolsheviks eventually gained control of all of Russia. And how did they govern? By creating a new aristocracy. They replaced an aristocracy of blood and power and money by an aristocracy of intellect and power, the members of the Communist Party. The years since 1917 have shown; insufficiency of the intellectual claim of Communism, so now Russia ruled by another aristocracy of blood, money, and power, who have all of the attributes of a traditional nobility anywhere and respond under exactly the same obligations. They differentiate themselves socially from the masses, run the government, support the same fine art, and practice the same condescending charity as the nobles whom they smashed in 1917 to 1920. They, too, rule by noblesse oblige.
Now it is time for a caveat. We desire to be understood as speaking in types, and average when we talk about the historic nature of aristocracy, the so-called nobility. Among the nobility doubtless there have been pure souls who recognized and attempted to live the
Royal Law, and their good works were genuine selfless help to those less fortunate than they. Had such souls been a majority, the history of the earth would have been very different, much happier. But such have not been in the majority. As a class, the influence of the nobility has always been more that of Satan than of God.
Recognition of that generalization caused the Founding Fathers of the United States expressly to forbid the establishment of a peerage. The wisdom of that move has been plain, at least to those who see with Restored Gospel eyes. But their refusal to recognize a nobility did not prevent the assembling of a defacto peerage which has carried on the European traditions of the nobility wherever enough money could be assembled to launch a dynasty.
While it can correctly be said that the world might be worse off were it not for the rule of the nobility (anarchy has few devotees), our point is that there is an alternative to aristocracy and noblesse oblige; the alternative is the Royal Law. To sharpen the contrast between these two approaches to solving the problems of mankind, let us now sum this feit and the counterfeit to make clear their striking differences.
1. In the Royal Law, God is loved and worshipped because of his righteousness, and the worshipper counts himself as nothing without God. In noblesse oblige, God is far, far away, if he exists at all. The nobility must take the place of God to the people.
2. In the Royal Law, God showers spiritual and temporal blessings upon all those who love his name and diligently keep his commandments. To be saved is to learn to love as God loves.
In noblesse oblige, one must amass and maintain fortune and power as one can. The end justifies the means of slavery, tyranny, oppression, and all manner of legal extortion. To be saved is to be of the nobility, to lord it over others.
3. In the Royal Law one loves ones neighbor as Christ loves him. He goes to the Father and seeks direction to know how, when, and where he should share what the Father has given him to help to relieve his neighbor’s misery, and is willing to share, to give, all that he he has.
Under noblesse oblige one is obliged to do something for the suffering, struggling masses. So one gives them policemen to establish order, government to promote trade so they can have jobs, medical programs so they can have better health, schools so they will not be illiterate. But very little, if any, of the family fortune every goes into any of these causes unless it can be recouped in good will or tax advantage. To be noble is to fling coins at the masses.
4. In the Royal Law, the main hope in sharing one’s wealth with the poor is the hope that one can help the poor turn to the Father and that they can learn to keep the Royal Law themselves. For if the poor do that, all of their problems will be solved. They will inherit all that the Father has, both temporally and spiritually, in both time and in eternity. Then they will be wealthy in a way that no earthly or mortal system could possibly match.
In noblesse oblige the main hope in helping the poor is to keep them fed, pleasured, working, and obedient, so that they will not disturb the status quo. Or if the nobility are religious, the reason for helping the poor is so that the poor can successfully endure the miseries of this world long enough to do their serf work; then God will reward them for their goodness and suffering in the next world.
It surely is true that God will reward the righteous poor. But a rich person rarely has a heavenly future.
As we turn to the world in which we live for examples of noblesse oblige, we see them everywhere. All are varieties of: I am noble. In condescend to relate to you who are inferior, e.g.,
Professional people who condescend to relate to laymen.
People in expensive homes who condescend to admit that people in hovels are human beings also.
Professors who condescend to teach students.
Elders who condescend to relate to younger people.
Younger people who condescend to acknowledge that the elderly are human beings.
The cultured who condescend to admit that the uncultured people do exist.
The strong that lord it over the weak.
The literate that lord it over the illiterate.
The married that lord it over the single.
Men who lord it over women.
Parents who lord it over their children.
The professional women who lord it over the housewife.
The housewife who feels superior to the professional woman.
The people high on the hill who look down on the people in the lowlands.
The athletes who swagger around those who didn’t make the team.
The verbal who tease those who struggle to speak.
The fortunate who note how the misery of the unfortunate is well-deserved.
The beautiful people who feel sorry for ordinary people.
The white people who look down on people of other colors.
The Mormons who look down on non-Mormons.
The government official who deigns to render a service to a citizen.
The “saved” who look down on the sinners.
It is plain that the list is virtually endless. It is also plain that most humans would gladly have some edge on others so they could lord it over others. All instances of this noblesse oblige have two things in common which are the perverse parallels to the Royal Law.
The first law of the nobility is to love and perpetuate that difference that sets one off from the masses. The second law of the nobility is to flaunt that difference which sets them off from the masses by displaying the difference whenever possible, but always in a condescending way. Noblesse oblige is the epitome of arrogance and selfishness, even as the Royal Law is the epitome of godly love.
It remains now in this paper to make plain how certain specific human miseries are to be cured through the ministrations of those who live the Royal Law. (We take it for granted that noblesse oblige never will nor never could solve any of these problems on a societal scale: the evidence for that is six thousand years of one miserable failure after another as the miseries and oppression of mankind have been perpetuated by the self-styled lords and landlords of humanity.)
IV. Solutions to Human Misery
Misery #1. Poverty.
Under the Royal Law every covenant servant of God sets the totality of his earthly goods in reserve to be ministered unto the poor. He holds nothing back, knowing that should he need to give away or lose all of his earthly substance to fulfill the Lord’s plan, then the Lord would yet make it possible for the labor of his two hands and the sweat of his brow to provide for the needs of his family. Having put all he has in reserve, he then makes diligent inquiry of the Lord as to whom the Lord would have him give what. Having received instructions he will give away his substance, directly or through the Church, as the Lord directs. If so instructed, he will bear witness of the goodness of God to the recipient and will encourage the recipient to faith in the Lord Jesus Christ; but if instructed not to say a word, he will give and not say a word. But he will pray mightily for that recipient, hoping that the Spirit of the Lord will penetrate to his heart, that he, the recipient, might turn and begin to love the Lord with all of his soul through the Restored Gospel.
Only thus will humanity see the world-wide end of poverty.
Misery #2. Ignorance.
Under the Royal Law, every covenant servant seeks after and treasures truth. He searches out the ways of nature and of the world until his faith in God is crowned with great understanding. He does not believe the opinion of any man, but tests all of the ideas he receives by the Spirit and by experiment, then holds fast to that which proves to be true and good. Then he consecrates all he has learned to the Lord and humbly seeks to know what to do with that knowledge. Usually his instruction will be to conduct his stewardship ably through the understanding he has gained and the further instruction he receives from day to day. But also, if so directed, he will share part of his truth with his neighbor. In so doing, he will warn the neighbor not to accept his human witness. He commends his neighbor to seek God: the Spirit of Truth, for in God that neighbor will find the greater treasures that he, the covenant servant, does not yet know. If the neighbor turns to love the Lord and to accept the Restored Gospel, that neighbor will then have access to the truth of all things in and through the Holy Ghost.
Thus can the ignorance and the chains of falsehood that bind mankind be dispelled and replaced by truth forever.
Misery #3. Foolishness.
Under the Royal Law, every covenant servant knows that the wisdom of the wisest man is foolishness before God. God sees all, knows all, understands all, but man sees little, and of himself knows and understands almost nothing. The covenant servant knows that God give liberally and upbraideth not when his servants ask in faith. So the servant asks, frequently, and obeys always and immediately. That obedience causes him to prosper, and his purposes fail not, because he loves that true and living God who purposes fail– not. In his success he sees a foolish neighbor who knows not God. The covenant servant seeks wisdom of God to know how to minister to the neighbor. The Lord may say “do nothing;” the servant will forebear. The Lord may say “give him money”! The servant will obey. The Lord may say “teach him how to avoid the pitfall that troubles him;” the servant will do so in all humility. The Lord may say “teach him the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ. That I may make him wise;” the servant will comply. In every case, the servant prays mightily for the neighbor that the neighbor might come to know and love the Lord and partake of his wisdom.
Thus can the foolishness and failure of every human enterprise be turned to success and accomplishment of things eternally worthwhile by the living of the Royal Law.
Misery #4. Ill Health
Under the Royal Law, every covenant servant knows that health is primarily a spiritual but also a physical matter. It makes a difference what and how he eats, drinks, and exercises, but it makes more difference whether he is filled with the love of God or if he lets Satan rage within him in anger, self-justification, and punishment of others. So he attempts to love the Lord with all of his soul, that he might cleanse the inward vessel, knowing that is his real hope for strengthening the outward vessel. When his body is renewed and strong, he places that strength at the Lord’s disposal. He perceives a neighbor who is ill, and implores the Lord as to how to help. Having received the Lord’s instruction, he nurses the neighbor, expending his own strength. But in addition he prays for the neighbor, and if so further instructed, shares with the neighbor the Restored Gospel truths. If asked, he lays on hands and speaks the Lord’s blessing upon the head of the neighbor. The servant hopes in all this that the neighbor will turn and love the Lord, that the shower of love coming back from the Lord will heal the neighbor in heart, mind, and body. Then the neighbor will know exactly what to do for himself, to have faith inwardly and outwardly, that he too might be renewed and make his strength part of the hand of God in all things.
Thus may all of the ill-health of mankind be cured?
Misery #5. Lack of Power
The covenant servant of the Lord finds himself in a world where men have a great deal of muscle power and mental power but are not thereby able to solve many of the most pressing human problems. This servant, because of his love of the Lord, has sought and received additional power, the power of the Holy Priesthood. That priesthood is effective and operative exactly to the degree that the covenant servant hungers and thirsts after righteousness and places the Lord’s will above his own in all things. When he keeps his covenants, that servant can control fire, flood, earthquake, climate, storm, disease, pestilence, mountains, rivers, the rotation of the earth, etc. Anxious to share this power with his neighbor who does not enjoy the same, the covenant servant implores the Lord to know how and what to share. If the neighbor has not received the Gospel, under the Lord’s direction he shares with the neighbor the Gospel message. As that is received, and as the neighbor is able to receive, and as it is fitting in the Lords authority in his earthly kingdom -The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints-, the neighbor is brought to faithfulness and then to a sharing of the priesthood power and authority. Then the neighbor has the power to solve every problem situation that confronts him in the stewardship God gives him in mortality.
By this same means can the lack of power to solve earthly problems be overcome for all mankind.
Until June 8, 1978, the opportunity to receive this power was not open to all men. On that day came a marvelous change. Why did the change come then? It had been prophesied that the change would come eventually, but why then? Two factors are important to mention: First, it was the Lord’s will, the right thing to do. Second, those who held the priesthood were very anxious to share the priesthood with every brother, who would love the Lord. The prayers of those who held the priesthood in behalf of their less fortunate brethren were undoubtedly a powerful influence to bring about the change. Their prayers and desire to share were a key aspect of making it right to make the change so that the Lord could instruct his prophet to make the change.
Misery #6. Being alone
Every righteous, healthy male covenant servant of the Lord of sufficient age is or has been married. Not so with many righteous female covenant servants of the Lord who desire to be married to a strong, good man and do not have that opportunity. It is one thing to tell them that they will get their reward in heaven. That is true. But it is like saying to the poor that the Lord has no power to lift their lot now, to the unlearned that the hidden treasures of knowledge are all reserved for the next world, or to the diseased and infirm that their cause is just but there is no healing power to help them. Following the principle that those who are rich have the opportunity to implore the Lord to know how to share with the poor, the changes which will enable the single righteous sisters of the Church to begin to fulfill their full earthly opportunities are much in the hands of the married sisters of the Church. When they who are rich implore the Lord that somehow the poor might be blessed in this regard, then it will become more right for the Lord to show forth his mighty arm. The poor in temporal resources in the Church yet languish because the rich do not yet love the Lord enough to implore him in their behalf. The ill in the Church yet languish because the healthy are not yet as concerned about them as they should be. The unlearned of the Church and the world are yet unlearned partly because the learned of the Church do not yet love the Lord enough to share more with them as the Lord directs.
May I now share with you the conclusion foregoing?
Conclusion #1: The measure of our love for the Lord is the degree to which we keep his commandments. To each of us he gives a mission as part of his commandments. He gives us a “what” and a “how.” Basically the “what” and the “how” are the same for each of us. The “what” of our missions is always to bear witness of him, to help to turn souls to him as we share our temporal blessings with them. The “how” of our missions is to do all that we do in righteousness, in and through covenants of the Restored Gospel and in the name of the Savior.
Conclusion #2: The measure of our love for our neighbor is the personal sacrifice we make to fulfill our mission to relieve our neighbor’s misery and to bear witness of the goodness of God to him. Whatever we get paid for doing, either in honor or money, is no sacrifice, and does not count as the work of God. Nor does it count if it is not done in the Lords own way. The work of God is always the free gift of love borne in sacrifice. The sacrifice always involves acting with a broken heart and a contrite spirit before God, and a giving up of our own time, strength, and substance to minister to genuine need. My belief is that it is the full-time mothers of this world who best perform this sacrifice and thus bust fulfill the Royal Law.
Conclusion #3: I have felt great anguish in my life because as a parent, spouse and neighbor I have been so imperfect. I have glimpsed the way of godliness but have been unable to exemplify it. Consideration of the Royal Law has brought me a new hope. That hope is in Christ. For I see that though my love and witness to my children is not perfect and I will never be able to minister fully to their miseries, I believe my love and witness have been sufficient to invite them to love the Lord. No man or men will ever be able to heal all of their wounds and troubles. But if each of them loves the Lord and fulfills his Royal Law, the Lord, who is perfect, will give them complete healing and blessing such as the people of this world have never dreamed. To pretend that man can save man, that the services one man can perform for another are sufficient for his needs, is as great a blasphemy as I know.
Conclusion #4: There is a worse hypocrisy in the earth than aristocracy. It is when the covenant servants of the Lord love him with only half of their heart, might, mind, and strength. They sit down in the gate of glory and will not go in themselves, nor will they help others to find the gate who would and could enter were the gate not blocked by double-minded carcasses. The kingdom has come a long way in 153 years. But the Royal Law yet beckons us to continue in faith unto the end.
The great truth of the Restored Gospel is that each human being can have a direct, personal, daily, saving relationship with God, now, in this world. If this relationship is sought humbly and intelligently by us through the laws and ordinances of the Restored Gospel, each of us shall know that bread of life, that fountain of living water, and shall never hunger nor thirst again. Unto this true nobility was each of us born. Thank you.
Chauncey R. Riddle Preliminary draft 14 January 1983
Table of Contents
Part I Introduction
Part
II Models of the Nature and Action
of Gods and Man
Part
III Religion
Part
IV Education and Communication
Part
V The Conversion Model
Part
VI The Kingdom of God
Part
VII Proselyting
Part
VIII Obstacles to Conversion
Part
IX Summary
Part I: Introduction
The purpose of this work is to construct a model of the
religious conversion of human beings in a frame of thought which arises from
the scriptures of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is
intended that this model should be sufficiently detailed that it will provide
many practical hypotheses which are susceptible of empirical validation or
refutation. It is here assumed that conversion is a real process in a real
world, and that intelligence applied to the process can make a significant
difference in the efficacy and efficiency of any proselyting program.
Of necessity, such a model must be built within a context of
an understanding of the reality of God, man, nature, and their dynamic
interactions, which understanding must be at least as detailed as the model.
That is a way of saying that this model must be true in-detail and be based on
truth to be valuable. Since truth is primarily the domain of the gods and their
prophets, a careful attempt is made here to interpret and construct only in
accord with the mind and will of our God. Needless to say, the assertions made
here will conflict with the received opinions of the world. But it is hoped
that thoughtful Latter-day Saints, servants of Jesus Christ, will read it with
interest and profit and perhaps add their own increments of light and truth
where it is lacking, that all of us who pray day and night for Zion to come
again upon the earth may be one step closer to seeing eye-to-eye.
A final reality important to note in this introduction is
that you, the reader, are entering into a personal conversation with me, the
writer. This writing is undertaken as a gift of my esteem for you, whoever you
are. It is my hope to write truly, but I know that I can only express my heart
and my mind. You will read this with your heart and mind and thus, in the
process, will judge my heart and mind and my love for you. I have two regrets
already. One, that I am sure my model is not final or definitive, for my heart
and mind are not yet what they could be. I have learned so much in the last
year, and especially in the last month, that while I exult in the goodness of
our God, I have a sense of the greater treasures that lie yet beyond the veil.
Secondly, I regret that I probably will not learn from you those things which
you clearly see which I do not yet see, this because of the difficulties and
proprieties of communication. But if you and I serve God so that His purposes
prevail, all of our regrets are swallowed in His love.
(Because this is yet a preliminary draft, much of it is
written in outline form to expedite (1) exposure of the ideas, and (2) your
opportunity to skip over parts which might not interest you.)
Part II: Models of the
Nature and Action of Gods and Men
A. A god is:
1. An independent being
(self-existing).
2. An intelligent being
(makes choices which are not externally controlled).
3. A righteous being
(righteousness: acting only for the welfare of others).
4. A holy being (wholly
dedicated to the work of righteousness).
5. A possessor of a body
(having a personal material nature through which to work).
6. A gendered being (male
and female).
7. A social being (dwells
with and works with other gods and other intelligent beings).
8. An omniscient being
(knows and understands everything, everywhere, past, present and future).
9. An omnipotent being
(having power to do anything that can be done).
10. A united being (acts in
perfect harmony with every other god).
11. A family being (has a
father and a mother).
12. An obedient being (does only
that which his father tells him to do).
13. A permanent being (not subject
to dissolution, death or retrogression).
B. A God is:
1. A god who is a father to
another being.
2. A group of gods who
preside over other beings.
C. There are two kinds of gods:
1. Those who have only
spirit bodies.
2. Those who have also
bodies of flesh and bone (male and female), who beget children.
D. Man is:
1. An independent being
(self-existing).
2. An intelligent being
(able to make choices which are not externally controlled).
3. A spirit being (begotten
in a spirit body by the gods).
4. A physical being
(begotten in flesh and bone by the gods)
5. A temporary being
(subject to change: death, progression, or retrogression).
6. A being presided over by
a God (the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost).
E. The natural man (fallen man) is:
1. A man who knows not or
who has rejected his God.
2. Subject to a pretended
god (Satan) who:
a. Fills his mind with
lies.
b. Entices him to do his or
her own will if that choice opposes God’s will.
c. Brings distress and
disease upon him.
d. Brings death upon him.
3. Touched by the light of
Christ (which guides him to know the best of his options of choice).
F. The first man and woman, Adam and Eve:
1. Were created by God to
populate this earth and to work out their own probation.
2. Were created spiritually
alive (the sensory organs of their spirit bodies were fully functional to
perceive spirit beings).
3. Were placed in a
paradisiacal (terrestrial) environment which also contained Satan.
4. Were free agents in one
thing: to partake, or not, of the forbidden fruit.
5. They partook of the
forbidden fruit, which resulted in their becoming natural, involving:
a. Immediate spiritual
death.
b. Change of their
environment from a terrestrial to a telestial state.
c. Satan gaining power over
them (See E 2, above).
6. Their becoming natural
gave them the opportunity to have mortal children, who are all born innocent
but also spiritually dead.
7. As God does (sooner or
later) for all natural men, He gave Adam and Eve the Gospel of Jesus Christ
that they might regain their spiritual life.
8. They accepted and lived
the Gospel to the end and were restored to Eternal Life.
G. The essential parts of every man are:
1. His mind, which is part of
his spiritual body and which allows him to:
a. Perceive
his natural surroundings.
b. Conceive
of possible understandings of himself and his surroundings.
c. Conceive
of possible objects of desire and possible means by which to attain those
desires.
d. Receive
falsehoods and misunderstandings from Satan. Receive the light of Christ and
the Holy Spirit.
e. Communicate
with other men and other beings.
2. His heart, which is part of
his spirit body and which allows him to:
a. Entertain the desires
and emotions of his own flesh (intensified by Satan).
b. Entertain the directions
and emotions of the light of Christ and/or the
Holy Spirit (the influence of God).
c. Choose whether to seek
the desires of his flesh, or to follow the influence of God.
d. Select a means by which
to try to attain a particular choice.
3. His strength, which is the
powers of his physical body, including:
a. His muscle power by
which to transport and dispose himself and to
alter his environment.
b. His brain, which enables
him to learn physical skills.
c. His memory, which
records all of his feelings, understandings, decisions, and actions.
d. His powers of
procreation, by which to beget children.
e. His power of speech and
other forms of communication.
4. His might, which includes all
of his influence in the world which is past the surface of his physical body, including:
a. His influence on other
people through communication.
b. The accumulation of his
physical efforts in time and space, the fruit of his skills (wealth).
c. His influence on the
physical world, especially including that impact he makes through tools,
machines, devices.
d. His influence on the
world through supernatural (priesthood) power, be it good or evil.
H. Every man acts in this world in the following pattern:
1. His mind perceives the
physical (and sometimes spiritual) environment of his own body and the state
and relationship of his body relative to that perceived environment.
2. His mind understands
something of the potentials of what he perceives for satisfying his desires
(positively and/or negatively).
3. His mind conceives of
many courses of action, things he might choose to do in and to his environment.
4. The light of Christ (his
conscience), if he still has it, shows him a best goal to seek and one or more
good means to that goal for his given environment.
5. The power of Satan tells
him to seek what he, the chooser, personally desires rather than to do what he
feels is best, and may enlarge to his mind evil goals and means to these goals
which he, the chooser, has not hitherto considered.
6. If the chooser chooses
what is best (goal and means), he acts as a little child does, simply and
delightedly choosing what is obviously good to do. So choosing, the
implementation is direct and always a good learning experience even if the means
fails to attain the goal.
7. If the chooser chooses
to accede to his own personal desires (which choice is abetted and commended by
Satan) in opposition to his feeling as to what is best, he will be bothered by
going against his conscience. He then may consider the matter further, arguing
with his conscience, rationalizing “good” reasons for acceding to his personal
desires (the flesh). This continues until his mind is cloudy, cluttered with
many reasons and options, so that which is best is no longer plain. At that
point, what he personally desires has no real rival, so he proceeds to
implement his plan to fulfill his own desire, thinking to himself that it
remains the only reasonable thing to do.
8. If enough choices
against conscience are made by a person, his conscience becomes seared, and
bothers him less. But it almost never gives up completely; its influence
remains to remind the person that he is not doing the best he knows.
Recognition of that contrariness brings a self-torment, divides the person, to
cause him to struggle against himself, and may result in “neurosis”,
“psychosis” or “psychosomatic” illness.
9. As a person chooses,
repeated choices form habits. Habits make it possible for choice of goals,
choice of means, and skills of implementation to be mastered so well that
reactions to an environment can become almost instantaneous and without
conscious thought. Every habit has been established in connection with choices.
“Accountability” is to be old enough and mature enough to have an even
opportunity to choose between conscience and the flesh (Satan) in a new area of
choice and action.
10. Novel choices cannot be
made by habit. Ordinary situations reveal a person’s habits. It is often the
case that extraordinary situations allow a person little choice.
Part III: Religion
A. Personal religion. Personal religion is the habits a person has
acquired for making and executing choices. A person’s personal religion and his
character are identical. The more habits one has, the more even novel situations
are reacted to by habitual choice patterns. The four basic areas of habit are:
The habits of mind:
a. The
concept patterns with which one perceives and conceives the world, especially
one’s concepts of self, man, and God.
b. The
understanding one has of the interactions and interrelationships of the things
one perceives and conceives to exist.
c. The
possible goals one conceives relative to given perceived environments.
d. The
possible means to possible goals one conceives relative to given perceived environment.
e. The
mental skills one uses in thinking.
2. The habits of heart:
a. The esteem or value and
emotions one has relative to things he perceives and conceives.
b. The
habit of preferring conscience over the flesh or vice versa in a typical choosing
opportunity.
c. The
habit pattern one employs to confuse choosing situation when one does not
choose to follow conscience.
3. The habits of body:
a. Habits
of hygiene, nourishment, posture,
sleeping, etc.
b. Habits
of speaking, communicating, manners.
c. Habits
of pleasure seeking.
d. Work
habits.
e. Physical
skills mastered.
f. Habits
of pain seeking/avoidance/suffering.
4. The patterns of might:
A person’s habits of mind, heart,
and body are reflected in the patterns of his might, such as:
a. The happiness of his
spouse and children and the order in their
lives.
b. The range and character
of his friends and cooperators.
c. The treasures which he
does or does not lay up.
d. What he does with his
surplus.
e. The order or disorder
found in his home and personal property.
It is to be emphasized that every
choosing, accountable human being has a religion. His own religion, his
character is his primary stewardship (dominion) in this life.
B. Institutional Religion. Institutional religions are social
organizations (groups of people) which act to influence the personal religion
(personal habits) of themselves and/or other persons. There are always four
basic elements or devices by which institutional religions attempt to influence
individuals:
1. Leadership: Someone must
direct the group functions and transmit that religion to the young.
2. Theology: A theology is
an understanding of men, society, the universe: all things that exist. Central
to every theology is a god. The god in every theology is the greatest good, the
final decision-maker, the being most esteemed. A god is necessary in every
theology so that there can be an ultimate arbiter of all decisions which must
be made (practical decisions; many
traditional theological issues are not related to practical decisions, which
has tended to devalue theology in many people’s eyes). The name for theology in
philosophy is “metaphysics;” in science it is “theory.”
3. Moral prescriptions: Moral
directives are the do’s and don’ts for individual personal choice which the
institution (the leader of the institution) enjoins upon its members. The moral
directives are the “heart” of every religion. Theology is basically the
rationale for the do’s and don’ts. If the moral directives change, the theology
must change to properly rationalize that change. Institutional religions which
fail to affect the conduct of individual members, which fail to gain obedience
to the prescribed moral directives, are failures; they die.
4. Ritual: Rituals are the
physical and social patterns of action which are constantly repeated to
initiate and intensify habit patterns of thought, feeling, and action in the
individual adherents of a religion. The staying power of a religion, which
enables it to endure from one generation to the next, is in its rituals, not in
its theology. The hoped for result of ritual is belief in the theology and
conformance to the moral directives of the religion, though sometimes orthodoxy
in theology is (unwisely) taken as a token of moral compliance.
C. Types of institutional religion. The three basic types of
institutional religions are churches, cultures, and governments. (Every social organization has a religious purpose.) An
example of each will be given:
1. Example of a church: The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints.
a. Leadership: Our Church
is an example of a social organization wherein the presiding authorities
attempt to influence the choices of members and non-members by encouraging them
to accept particular ritual observances and certain theological views
ultimately to help them live godly lives. The older members try to influence
the younger members in the same manner to the same end.
b. Theology: The LDS view
of God and man (see Part II, above).
c. Moral prescriptions:
1) Of the heart: Love the
Lord with all of one’s heart, might, mind, and strength and love one’s neighbor
as oneself.
2) Of the mind: Counsel
with the Lord in all thy doings and lean not to thine own understanding and He
will lead thee in the paths of righteousness.
3) Of strength: Be ye clean
that bear the vessels of the Lord.
4) Of might: Thou shalt
offer an acceptable offering unto the Lord: tithing, consecration, beneficence.
d. Rituals:
1) Private Rituals
(worship):
a) Prayer: Speaking to our
God very personally.
b) Scripture study: Seeking
out an understanding of the Lord’s law and ways.
c) Meditation: Receiving
the whisperings of the Holy Spirit and pondering upon them to achieve
understanding and to discern the path of action before us.
d) Beneficence (alms):
Searching out the poor (the hands that hang down, the feeble knees) and
ministering to them according to the Lord’s instructions.
2) Public rituals
(worship):
a) The ordinances of the
priesthood.
b) Family prayer, family
scripture reading, family home evening, family council.
c) Ward meetings, stake and
general conferences.
d) Proselyting.
Note: It is plain that the
strength of the LDS religion lies in the private rituals, for unless they are faithfully executed all else
will be empty forms.
2. Example of a culture-type institutional religion: New
York City Judaism.
(A culture is distinct from a
church in that the culture has a widely dispersed, almost accidental
leadership, whereas a church has a centralized hierarchy.)
a. Leadership: Basic
leadership in cultural Judaism is provided by the mothers who instill in the
young the fundamental values and habits of the religion. (The rule: a person is
Jewish if his mother was Jewish.)
b. Theology:
1) No belief in the God of
the Old Testament; human “intellect” has become god.
2) Veneration of Einstein,
Freud and Marx.
3) Science as the key to
knowledge.
4) Success in becoming
intellectual, cultured and wealthy greatly valued.
5) Value placed in blood line.
c. Moral prescriptions:
1) Intellectual
contribution to society is the greatest good.
2) Marry within the culture
and blood.
3) Within the culture,
share money, cooperate, but no usury.
4) Make lots of money,
spend carefully.
5) Frankness, courage,
persistence, aggressiveness, and problem solving are highly valued.
6) Lie if necessary.
7) Chastity less valued
once a person leaves home, divorce looked down upon.
d. Ritual:
1) Private rituals:
a) Study (do well in
school).
b) Think (figure out how to
get what you want).
2) Public rituals:
a) Family discussion:
setting of goals and values.
b) Bar Mitzvah (cash given
by friends to a boy upon coming of age).
c) Weddings (very social
occasions; expensive presents and cash given).
d) Hebrew school (special
language training sets people apart).
3. Example of a Government institutional religion:
[Note: All governments tend to have
an “established” religion because no government can endure which does not rest
upon a common cultural tradition (religion). This is because not all matters
can be legislated and there must be some cultural commonality for the success
of matters which are legislated. The established religion in the United States
of America originally was the Protestant cultural religion; that nation’s
established religion today is the cultural religion of Humanism. This change
was wrought in the main by gaining control of the school system (making it
“public”) and then requiring compulsory attendance at the lower levels.]
Example of a
government religion: Soviet Russia.
a. Leadership: The
leadership in practical matters is provided by members of the Communist Party
(which is a church within the government), who hold the principle offices in
the government. Leadership in theoretical matters is provided by the university
professors (the universities are another church within the government).
b. Theology (straight
Humanism):
1) The leader of the
government is the god. The intelligentsia are his priesthood.
2) There is no
supernatural.
3) Science is the means to
all knowledge; technology is the means to all accomplishment.
4) Man evolved from lower forms
of life.
5) The group is more
important than the individual.
c. Moral prescriptions:
1) Loyalty to the
government (the collective) is the greatest good.
2) Traditional religions,
especially churches, are to be stamped out.
3) Traditional “church” morality
has no meaning. Lying, stealing, fornication are legitimate means by which to
achieve the government’s goals.
d. Ritual:
1) Private rituals
a) Study of Communist
theory.
b) Hard work to achieve the
government’s goals.
2) Public rituals
a) Mass indoctrination (all
media, schools, cultural events).
b) Parades featuring
military power, giant pictures of leaders.
c) Graduation from universities
and schools as an ordination to the approved state priesthood.
Part IV: Education and
Communication
A. Education
1. Education is the process
of acquiring a religion.
a. Acquiring habits of
heart: Values
b. Acquiring habits of
mind: Beliefs, thinking
c. Acquiring habits of
body: Strength, skills
2. There is no education
which does not involve values, beliefs, thinking patterns, and skills.
3. In all education the
educator is communicating his values, beliefs, and thinking patterns to the
young.
4. Therefore, there is no
such thing as secular education. All education is religious education.
B. Communication
1. Communication is the
process whereby one person influences the feelings, beliefs, and thinking
patterns of another person.
2. Every person has a
religion. A person’s religion is always the basis and is usually the substance
of any communication he sends or receives (interpretations he makes).
3. Therefore, all
communication is religious communication. There are no such things as objectivity,
unbiasedness, neutrality, or pure information.
4. All educational
processes are communication.
5. Communication is the
basic public ritual of every institutional religion.
C. Schools
1. All schools are forms of
institutional religion wherein either a cultural religion or the personal
religions of the instructors are communicated to and enjoined upon the students
by the teachers.
2. Ordinarily, schools are
the second most powerful form of institutional ritual (the family
communications are first, peer communication and media vie for third/fourth).
3. To control the religion
of a people, those in power find it most effective to:
a. Destroy family
communication as much as possible.
b. Have mandatory
attendance at controlled schools.
c. Control the media
communications.
d. Disallow non-government
meetings.
The factor hardest for governments
or other institutions to control is peer communication.
D. Training
1. Training is education
which maximizes teacher control and minimizes student initiative in the
acquisition of habits of mind, heart, and body.
2. Emphasis on training in
education tends to destroy creativity unless there is a studied rewarding of
student initiative.
3. Repressive religions
(persons, churches, cultures, and governments) tend to emphasize training in
education and tend to reward creativity negatively.
4. Repressive religions
survive only as long as they have physical power superior to all rivals, for
only then can they control the training of the young.
5. The most enduring
institutional religions in free situations are the ones which successfully
foster private (personal) ritual. This fostering is achieved only through
training (public ritual).
Examples of institutional
religions which have endured in politically free or adverse situations are
Buddhism and Judaism.
Part V: The Conversion Model
A. Definition of Conversion. Conversion is the process wherein an
individual person breaches his own present habit patterns by choosing to
believe, feel, say, and do things differently than he previously has done,
repeating those new choices until they are firmly established as new habit
patterns. Another way of saying this is that the person by deliberate effort
has reformed his own character. This change can be an improvement (to become
more like our God), a degradation (to become more like Satan) or simply an
exchange (one good or bad habit replaced by another good or bad habit).
1. Strength of character is
the number and strength of one’s habits. A person of strong habits is said to
do what he does “very religiously.” A person of strong character tends to shape
his own environment (for good or evil), whereas a person of weak character (few
and weak habits) tends to be controlled by his environment.
2. The counterfeit of
conversion is conformity. Conformity is the acquiring and manifesting of
outward habits of strength and might (body and stewardship) which are not the
result of changes of mind and of heart. Conformity is resistive response to
strong environmental pressure and thus will endure only as long as the
environmental pressure is maintained. Conversion and conformity are easily
distinguished if one can observe a person in a situation where that person
feels free to do anything he desires to do with no human penalty attached. The
Savior has told us to judge men by their fruits.
3. Persons most susceptible
to environmental pressures are little children. Children naturally and easily
acquire the habits of their parents. As they learn language they also learn
values (how their parents feel about things), a theology (what the parents
believe about the universe), habits of body (how they walk, talk, sit, dress,
etc.), and patterns of might (order, disorder, etc.). When evil parents fix
falsehood, bad emotional patterns, bad body and might patterns on their
children, these are the “chains of hell.” Though Satan cannot tempt little
children directly, he can impose the shackles of evil character on them very
efficiently through evil parents.
Example: Parents who say “I will
not impose religion upon my children. When they are of age they may choose for
themselves.” are actually imposing their own personal religion, their feelings,
ideas, words, and action patterns on their own children. They are teaching
their children to dislike churches and to like iconoclasm, among other things.
4. Training is a means of
gaining conformity in adults. It is effective to the degree which rewards and punishments
are great and swift. In little children, training usually is accepted in mind
and heart as well as body, since there are no previous habits of mind and heart
to cause resistance.
B. Causation in conversion. Since true conversion must always be self-conversion
of mind and heart, what causes conversion? The cause can never, by definition,
be a factor of the person’s external environment. Crucial to this model is the
following understanding:
1. The cause of conversion
is always the uncovering of a latent desire within the heart of an individual.
The desire has been latent because the individual did not previously understand
that a certain option even existed, or, because he previously did not think it
possible or wise to choose that option even though it was known and desired.
2. The occasion of
conversion is always a new understanding of the world wherein a person perceives
(learns of) a new option for choice and a means to implement that choice or
simply a new and possible means to implement a choice previously desired.
Example: It always troubled the
heart of Person X when a little child of his group was exposed to the elements
to die; but he could not resist because this was the long established practice
of his culture and was supported by seemingly incontrovertible reasoning. But
upon hearing the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ, he found new strength for his
feeling that exposing children was wrong because he now had a new source of
ideas, comfort, and revelation from God through the Holy Ghost, to help him to
know how to implement a change within his own stewardship.
Note: The net result of this aspect of the model is that converts
are discovered, never made. The process of uncovering latent hope and desire is
to bring to people new options for believing, feeling, speaking, and acting.
C. Stages of conversion. Assuming the natural man as the reference
stage, we may postulate both positive and negative changes from that level. The
levels are arbitrary, for the range of conversion in life is a continuum, the
increments of which are discernible changes of habit in mind, heart and
strength and might. Change of mind may lag while changes of heart and strength
progress, for instance. But the positing of typical stages can be convenient
guide posts just as mile markers note the accumulation of many increments of
distance on a highway.
1. The natural man is taken
to be a person who alternates almost randomly between doing what he knows is
best and what he personally desires to do. He exhibits benevolence or malice
alternately.
2. Stages of positive
conversion. These are the result of choices to yield to the divine influence in
one’s life which enable one to respond to become more like God. Each one of
these stages is a measuring point of the divine spiritual continuum which
begins with the light of Christ, develops into the gift of the Holy Ghost and
culminates in the open vision of the seer.
a. Conversion to morality. Change of the mind to accept
the witness of one’s own conscience and thus to recognize that there is a right
and a wrong discernable in most situations. That change must be accompanied by
a change of the heart to prize the right, therefore to desire it and choose it
consistently. This is taken to be the
most important of all conversion steps for it is the instrumentality by which
each succeeding positive step is taken. The necessary requisite for this change
is to be honest in heart.
b. Conversion to social responsibility. Change of the
mind to recognize the existence of God and the importance of acting to honor
God and other men. Change of the heart to choose responsible action
consistently is the prerequisite for this new level, which is to keep the
standards of the Ten Commandments.
c. Conversion to The Church of Jesus Christ (of
Latter-day Saints, in this dispensation). Change of the mind to recognize the
authority of God in the priesthood authority of the Church. Change of the heart
to prize and identify with the Church. Change of the body to keep the word of
wisdom and become a participant in Church meetings and functions. To keep the
Ten Commandments is the prerequisite to change to this stage of conversion.
d. Conversion to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Change of the
mind to understand the Gospel pattern of faith, repentance, baptism, receiving
the Holy Ghost and endurance to the end as the pattern for making every
decision in life. Change of the heart to rely alone upon the merits of Christ.
Change of the body to give strength only to those causes which are good. This
stage is marked by the adoption and daily practice of the private rituals
(prayer, scripture study, meditation, beneficence) of the Savior’s religion.
Conversion to the Church is prerequisite to conversion to the Gospel.
e. Conversion to godliness. The mind has changed to a
rather complete understanding of the ways of God and of one’s own stewardship
before him. The heart has changed to become pure, to have no selfish prizing of
any kind. The body has changed to reflect the countenance and actions of the
Savior because it has been renewed. The might has changed to become a little
celestial kingdom.
3. Stages of negative
conversion. These steps lead one from the state of the natural man to become
more like Satan.
a. Conversion to immorality (selfishness). Changes from
the vacillating of the natural man to a studied rejection of one’s conscience
and all that is good (hardening of one’s heart) in favor of consistent choosing
of one’s own personal desires.
b. Conversion to depravity. Change of mind and heart to
study out means to take deliberate advantage of other people to fulfill one’s
own personal desires.
c. Conversion to secret combinations. Change of strength
and might to make league with other depraved and immoral persons to form social
organizations to increase one’s own might in satisfying personal desires.
d. Conversion to Satanic priesthood. Change of mind to
foster direct contact with Satan. Change of heart to do whatever evil thing
Satan suggests. Receiving of strength and might from Satan, both natural and
supernatural, to build an evil dominion.
e. Conversion to perdition. This final stage can be taken
only by one who has previously been converted to the Gospel of Jesus Christ and
who then deliberately rejects all that is divine as to heart, might, mind and
strength. Such an one delivers himself knowingly and totally to become like
Satan.
D. Conversion of the mind. To convert one’s own mind is to change
one’s beliefs and one’s thinking processes (skills and practices in imagining
real and imaginary structures and events). The following items are the
important parameters of conversion of the mind.
1. One’s concept of himself
is critical: Who he is, where he came from, what his potentials are, what he
can and cannot change about himself and his environment; these are the most
important concepts of the mind.
2. One’s concepts of other
people is the important context factor relative to one’s concept of self.
3. The most important
“other” person is one’s god (one’s greatest good). Everyone has one: his god is
the person he finally defers to in making crucial decisions. This may be
himself, another living human being, the true and living God, or Satan (there
are no other possibilities, for a person’s god must communicate with him,
answer his questions, to function as his god).
4. The understanding one
has of the status, nature, and functioning of plants, animals, the earth, and
the cosmos, is important.
5. The thinking habits of
conceptualizing, separating reality from fantasy, categorizing, predicting,
planning, creating, etc., are each an integral part of each person’s character
and the habits that control them are subject to his own will.
6. The care and
deliberateness with which a person perceives, conceives, and establishes his
arrays of options for action is a matter of chosen habit (the manner of use of
his thinking skills).
The following table suggests
possible changes in the mind of man as he passes through the different stages
of conversion:
E. Conversion of the heart: To convert one’s heart is to change
what one prizes (one’s treasure). That change will result in change of what one
chooses both as to ends and the means to those ends. The following items are
important parameters of prizing and choosing.
1. The basic prizing is how
one feels about the relative worth of one’s own feelings as to what he wishes
to do (the desires of his own flesh supported by Satan’s encouragement) as
opposed to his feelings as to what is right to do, what he ought to do in that
situation (the influence of the light of Christ/the Holy Ghost as manifest in
his own conscience).
2. Next is the prizing one
does of other persons around him, as to whether he feels they are holy or not
(actually or potentially); beings whom he should respect or not; beings whom he
could (should) use as means for his own ends, or not.
3. The prizing of material
objects and functions, possessing and using plants, animals, the earth, and the
artifacts of man.
4. As the correct prizings
take their place, feelings of pure love (charity), can and will grow in the
heart both for God and for all of His creatures.
The following table suggests
possible changes in the heart of man as he passes through the different stages
of conversion:
F. Conversion of the physical body (strength). The body can be
converted only as the mind and the heart are converted and control it.
Important parameters of conversion of the body are:.
1. Change of habits of
hygiene (especially cleanliness); eating habits, dress and grooming habits,
sleeping habits, etc.
2. Change of habits such as
to the ability to focus attention, to do sustained mental and physical labor.
3. Change of skill
development in physical skills (walking, talking, foreign languages, athletic
skills, work skills).
4. Change of physical
strength and endurance.
The following table suggests
possible changes in the strength (body actions) of man as he passes through the
different stages of conversion:
G. Conversion of might. If a person’s (stewardship) dominion
includes other persons, animals, plants, etc., he is responsible to train them.
As a righteous steward he will train them in the skills necessary to become
servants of the Lord (good communication skills, reverence, obedience,
industry, cleanliness, etc.) and will encourage them to present their own hearts
and minds to the Lord as a living sacrifice, that the Lord might then write His
law in their minds and in their hearts. As a brother and son, he will exemplify
in these stewardships all he teaches and will attempt to emulate the Savior in
every way.
The conversion and/or consecration
of a person’s might testifies of the conversion of the steward.
The following table suggests
possible changes in the might of man as he passes through the different stages
of conversion:
H. Factors that influence conversion. Though all conversion is a
matter of deliberate choice, there are factors outside the heart and mind of
the person which affect the choice options of the person and are therefore
important to the conversion process. These factors operate to open and close
options of choice in both good and evil directions.
1. Factors for good in conversion. This sequence is
intended to proceed from weakest to strongest. These are factors outside the
body of the individual which provide a second witness in addition to that of
the divine influence felt internally in one’s conscience. The internal divine
influence consists of the light of Christ and the gift of the Holy Ghost.
a. Nature. The order,
symmetry, and beauty of nature are revealed to men by the light of Christ, in
their conscience. Nature is part of the might of God and bespeaks His hand,
mind, and heart. To open one’s mind and heart to recognize the hand of God in
all things is one step towards accepting the divine influence of Christ in
one’s life.
b. The words and deeds of godly men and
women. Men and women who act morally provide an occasion for the
conscience of the observer to register approval both of the act and of the
spiritual influence which such people radiate at that moment. Acceptance of
that approval of one’s conscience strengthens the power of conscience and makes
it easier for the observer to follow conscience, to be moral himself.
c. The Holy Scriptures.
Reading the scriptures provides an opportunity for the conscience to witness to
the individual of the existence and goodness of God and of His way, the way of
righteousness. Thus the mind may be better furnished with essential truth about
all things and about the options for righteous action. When the scriptures have
been altered by man, these truths and options are clouded or confused, causing
men to stumble; but even such altered scriptures contain enough good for the
influence of God to become stronger in the life of any reader who is converted
to morality.
d. The words and deeds of living
prophets and prophetesses. These are persons truly representing the
true God because they are commissioned by Him and act under His guidance. Their
words and deeds provide an exceptional occasion for the conscience of the
individual to learn of the nature and ways of God and to feel His spiritual
influence.
e. Angelic messengers. These
persons are sent by God when a work is to be done that cannot be done by living
prophets. Usually angels are sent to bestow instruction or power; but these can
be received only by persons who are already converted to following the Lord. In
exceptional cases, they are sent to over whelm the mind and heart of a person
because he or she has hardened his heart (rejected his conscience) and has not
accepted the living prophets (such as did Saul and Alma the Younger).
f. The appearance of God.
There is no stronger witness or evidence of the truth or rightness of
conscience than a visitation from God Himself. He appears to a man or woman to
provide a strong influence to stabilize the mind and heart of a prophet (Moses,
Joseph Smith), or to give a condemning witness to the ungodly (the Second
Coming).
2. Factors for evil in conversion. This sequence again
is intended to proceed from weakest to strongest. These are factors outside the
body of the individual which provide a second impetus to evil in addition to
the internal selfish desires as aided and intensified by revelation from Satan
(which are collectively called the “lusts of the flesh”).
a. The words and deeds of natural
men and women. These persons exhibit a vacillation and
double-mindedness which strengthens the selfish urge in the beholder as the
beholder sees the deeds and feels the spiritual influence of such persons.
b. The words and deeds of depraved
and conspiring men and women. The steady, strong evil aura of these
persons and the audacity of their evil words and deeds appeal to the fleshly desires of the person, strengthen the
impetus to selfishness, and abets the temptation of Satan within individuals
who observe them.
c. The writings of natural and depraved
men and women. The satanic “scriptures” portray and commend falsehood and evil in an authoritative and
forceful manner, an impetus which further
abets the inclinations to selfishness and satanic action in the flesh of the
observer. (Classic example: pornography.)
d. The words and deeds of the
representatives of Satan’s priesthoods. These who practice priestcraft,
often feigning righteousness, perpetrate and amplify evil and incite observers to evil in a powerful,
pervasive way, enjoining the chains of hell upon all who will listen to them.
They act for power, praise, and gain and offer to share power, praise and gain
with those who will make league with them.
e. Demonic messengers. Evil
spirits who come at the invitation of the living to do the bidding of Satan to
furnish gifts and power to perpetuate evil. These cause fear and awe, cowing
the will of those who are not strongly committed to following the divine
influence, strengthening the selfish in their carnal desires (encouraging them
to lift up their heads in wickedness).
f. The appearance of Satan.
Apparently a suave gentleman, the master of deceit, the eternal champion of
selfishness, lies, and perversion, who comes to use, then to cast off his admirers who have converted themselves
to some degree of immorality (e.g., as he did with Korihor).
I. The key to conversion. The simple key to conversion, the
change of one’s habits, is what one chooses to do when one has the alternative
of heeding one’s conscience (the divine influence), or of heeding one’s selfish
desires (the lusts of the flesh as aided and strengthened by Satan). To choose
conscience consistently is to build character towards becoming like God. To
choose one’s own desires (selfishness) is to build character towards becoming
like Satan. The great and powerful truth in this matter is that no one is tempted by Satan or his own flesh except
in and through his own desires. Whatever a person allows his heart to
prize, he can and will be tempted by it. Whatever we prize or treasure
ultimately controls us. The only prizing which will save a person from evil is
to prize only the will of God (to
have an eye single to the glory of God), which is the only way to give up
selfishness. The narrow path to that end is to listen to one’s own conscience.
If followed faithfully, every man’s conscience will lead him unfailingly to
accept the influence of God in his life, step by step, until he can finally
make that final glorious step wherein he not only says but actually does nothing but the Father’s will. Then
truly he has reshaped his own character in the image of Jesus Christ. Another
name for that reshaping is “repentance.”
J. Apostasy. Apostasy means to stand away from the group. Whenever
an individual changes his personal religion to be more and more different from
some (any) institutional religion, he is apostatizing from that institution. An
individual cannot apostatize from his own personal religion for whatever he
does is his religion. An individual
can convert himself from one personal religion to another by forming new habits
by using his power to prize and choose differently. But no person can ever
escape from himself (from his own character, from his own religion).
K. The eternal consequence of conversion to godliness. Our character
which is all of our habits of mind (memory), heart (desires), strength (purity)
and might (dedication) is all we take with us through the veil of death, for we
are our own personal religion. If our
character has become godly during our probation, then we may claim in eternity
all those special family relationships which have been dear to us in our
probation and wherein we have sought permission that they might become eternal.
That is done by seeking and receiving the requisite godly ordinances and then
sealing these ordinances with the pure love of Christ.
Part VI: The Kingdom of God
The kingdom of God is the earthly dominion of our God. It
includes 1) all of nature, 2) all human beings who are either not accountable
(his little ones), or who are accountable and have converted themselves at
least to the level of morality, 3) the handiwork created by those who are
converted to morality (and which is yet in the stewardship of those who are
converted to that stage), and 4) The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints.
A. Nature. Nature is clean, orderly, powerful, fruitful, and an
ideal habitat for man’s probation. Through it God sends His rain on the just
and on the unjust, giving the unjust space for repentance. But there is a
difference: Nature obeys those who obey God, but is the master of those who
defy God.
B. Human beings.
1. Those not accountable. Over the unborn, the young, the ill, and the
demented, those who are accountable as stewards hold a godly power, and for the
use of that power they are accountable to God. Evil men use that godly dominion
to further their own selfish purposes, either to let live or to kill, to help
to heal or to leave alone, whichever furthers their selfish purposes. This is
what the scriptures call “offending” God’s little ones; unless there is
repentance, such evil men can only dwell with Satan, here and hereafter. Godly
men and women take special care for those little ones, shielding, nurturing and
protecting them under God’s direction until God makes those little ones
accountable or takes them into eternity.
2. Those who are accountable and are converted to morality. Every soul
on the earth who is accountable receives a probation. No man is left entirely
to Satan except at his own insistence. The power of God (the light of Christ)
is with every man to give each the opportunity to turn to the light from
darkness, to morality from selfishness. Every soul on earth who honestly abides
his own conscience is an ally to and servant of God, thus an ally to The Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
C. The handiwork of honorable men and women. The human artifacts
of the world, on all levels, are neither good nor bad in and of themselves, but
are instruments to be used for good or ill by good or evil persons. But there
is a difference between the handiwork of a good man and that of an evil man.
1. A good man crafts under
the influence of the light of Christ. He therefore produces objects and
instruments intended for good purposes (to help mankind) and he works to do
well in his art, that his artifact may serve well and serve long in the use for
which it is intended. The light of Christ urges him to excellence in both
function and structure, substance and appearance. If appropriated by an evil
man, the handiwork of the good man usually will serve the evil man better for
his evil purposes than will the handiwork of an evil man. (A piano made by a
good man will serve an evil man longer and better than one made by an evil
man.)
2. An evil man crafts under
the influence of the spirit of Satan, which means that he produces things with
as little effort as possible, more for appearance than for quality, more for
immediacy than for future reliability, and seeks a maximum reward for his effort.
(The piano made by an evil man shines but has a poor sounding board, will not
stay in tune, nor hold together long, either in the hands of a good or an evil
man.) Only when he crafts an instrument of evil does an evil man work with
sacrifice, care, and diligence for quality.
3. Anyone
who works diligently with heart and mind and body to produce high quality
artifacts for the peaceful and honorable uses of mankind serves God and builds
the kingdom of God. Such persons may not be moral in some ways, but being moral
in any way, such as producing honorable work, is an important step in the right
direction. The work of such persons can belong to the kingdom of God even if
they themselves are sufficiently immoral in another part of their lives that they
do not belong to the kingdom of God.
D. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Though there
are good men and women in many other churches who are part of the kingdom of
God because they are moral persons, there is but one church organization on the
earth at the present time which is part of the kingdom of God. The Church of
Jesus Christ is those people who are converted far enough that they can be
called “saints” or holy ones because they have wholly dedicated themselves to
the work of Christ in the earth. They may not be perfect yet, but they are
trying, having entered in at the gate. The gateway to this part of the kingdom
is baptism, and anyone who wills not to be baptized when the opportunity is
available so wills not to pass an impenetrable barrier to further steps of
conversion. The essential aspects of the Church are its priesthood structure,
the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the ordinances, and church meetings.
1. The priesthood structure.
The priesthood is the power and authority to represent God. It’s mission is to
open succeeding and appropriate opportunities so that every human being may be
able to choose to come unto God, to become as He is. The essential works of the
priesthood are to teach, to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, to judge the
conversion of men, to administer the ordinances, and to organize the Church and
conduct its affairs.
a. To teach. Teaching the
Restored Gospel and all other truths important to the welfare of mankind is a
priesthood function. Many outside the priesthood would pretend to this calling.
Teaching is to be done only under the immediate direction of the Holy Spirit as
to whom what is taught and when. This teaching takes place in the homes of the
Saints, in the meetings of the Church, and in the missionary labors of every
servant of God, and anywhere else that the work of God can be pursued.
b. To preach. To preach is
to bind a witness, by divine commission, of the true and living God, of the
Restored Gospel, and of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, upon
those who will not willingly be taught about these things.
c. To judge. Judging is a
priesthood function enjoined by God in order that ordinances and callings might
be administered only to those persons for whom such could be a step forward. A
person who is not converted to morality is not a proper candidate for baptism,
though repentance can lift him successively to the stage of being converted to
morality and then to social responsibility. After that if he can believe in
Jesus Christ and receive a sufficient witness of the divinity of the priesthood
authority of the Church, being baptized could take him a step forward. When he
is truly converted to the Church, then receiving the offices of the priesthood
could be a step forward. When he is truly converted to the Gospel, then
receiving the temple ordinances could be a step forward. All these judgments
must be made by men, holding the priesthood, but not as men. By the gifts of
God they must render God’s judgment in each case.
d. To administer the ordinances.
Ordinances are occasions of enlarging the mind, the strength, and the might of
those who have godly hearts. As such persons thus gain understanding, health,
and power, they may more fully and more ably serve the Lord. If the ordinances
are properly administered by god-fearing men and women, and are properly
received by the recipient, the recipient is always lifted to new options and
opportunities.
e. To organize the Church and to
conduct it’s affairs. Appointing officers in the Church organization
and the conducting of the meetings and other public matters of the Church are essential
in order to continue the instructing and motivating of those who have entered
in at the gate. Only those who are already instructed and motivated can
instruct and motivate others. If there are too many to be helped and too few
helpers, the tree begins to produce strange fruit. If there are many to
instruct and motivate but few to be instructed and motivated, those branches
produce little fruit. The end of all Church organization activity is to help
every person in this world to have increased options for becoming more like
God, whatever he presently may be.
2. The Gospel of Jesus Christ.
The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the information one must believe and accept to be
in a position to profit from accepting baptism into The Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints. But to believe the Gospel and to live it are two quite
different stages of conversion. Those who are converted to the Church are as
newborn infants, spiritually, and must be loved, protected, and nourished. The
members of the Church and the Holy Spirit provide the love of God, the Church
organization and the priesthood provide the protection of God, and the words of
God provide the nourishment.
To be converted to the Gospel one
must learn to:
a. Feast upon the words of
Christ (through the scriptures and the living prophets) until he can rely alone
upon the merits of Christ. This is faith indeed.
b. Eliminate every
violation or transgression of his conscience (repent of his sins).
c. Keep the promises of the
baptismal covenant which means to:
1) Bear the Savior’s name,
gratefully and honorably, always.
2) Always remember Him.
3) Keep all of the
commandments which He gives them.
d. Accept and live by every
word that cometh out of the mouth of God (to have received the Holy Ghost and
be hearkening to its influence always).
e. To live fully all one
knows, hoping for and praying for further instruction (enduring to the end).
3. The ordinances:
a. Baptism: To allow the
recipient to affirm solemn promises to the Lord, thus to obey the commandment.
b. Laying on of hands for
the gift of the Holy Ghost: To confirm the person as a member of The Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, to entitle the recipient to the constant
companionship of the Holy Spirit, and to enjoin initial instruction upon the
newly-baptized member.
c. Partaking of the
sacrament: To renew our covenants and to receive again the Holy Spirit by
partaking of the emblems of the Savior’s flesh and blood.
d. Bestowal of the Aaronic
priesthood: To empower the recipient to be an authorized teacher of truth, to
be able to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to work, judge, and to
preside in temporal matters of the kingdom of God.
e. Bestowal of the
Priesthood of Melchizedek: To empower the recipient to fill all of the
functions of the Aaronic Priesthood; to be able to labor, judge, and preside in
the spiritual affairs of the kingdom of God; to receive the mysteries.
f. Temple ordinances: To
strengthen the mind and heart of the individual to enable him to succeed in
enduring to the end.
g. Other ordinances: To
strengthen mind, heart, and body and might and to be able to endure the
opposition of this world in serving our God.
4. Church organizations and
meetings. The Church is organized into wards, stakes, regions, areas
and missions to facilitate administrative matters. The administrative matters
focus upon converting the membership to live the Gospel (the perfecting of the
Saints), making possible the ordinance work for the dead, and teaching the
Gospel to all the world. The purpose of the meetings:
a. Sacrament meeting: To
partake of the sacrament and to feast upon the words of Christ.
b. Sunday School/Primary:
To provide opportunity for free discussion concerning understanding and living
the Gospel.
c. Priesthood/Mutual/Relief
Society: To teach the duties and opportunities of priesthood service and to
organize the work of administering to the poor (poor in spirit, in knowledge,
in health, in wealth, etc.).
d. Conferences: To check
the spiritual harmony of family, ward, stake, and general authorities with each
other.
The Church also fulfills many
social needs for members. But the social aspect is incidental: the essential
purpose is to prepare every member to go forth to do the works of righteousness
(beneficence in particular).
5. Conclusion: The function
of every aspect of the kingdom of God on the earth is to witness to every human
being of the goodness of God and to invite each receiver of that witness to
convert himself into the image of God.
Part VII: Proselyting
A. Our commission. We are instructed to preach the Gospel to the
ends of the earth, to every nation, kindred, tongue and people. In our day all
must hear the Gospel to be prepared for the great (for the righteous) and
dreadful (for the wicked) day of the Second Coming of the Lord. As in the days
of Noah, every soul who willnot
hearken to His voice will be cut off. The world today ripens in iniquity, even
as it did in the days of Noah, which process sharpens the contrast between the
way of God and the way of Satan, making this a most exciting and fruitful time
in which to live and to bear witness.
B. Our witness. We hope to bear witness in every honorable manner
possible. The following are our principal opportunities:
1. Our individual personal witness opportunities:
a. To
communicate only the truth with our mouths and our writing, in order to touch
minds.
b. To
radiate the warmth of the Holy Spirit, to touch hearts.
c. To
dress, groom, and comport our bodies honorably to show the strength of the
Lord.
d. To
care for our property, beautify our homes, honor our contracts, and lift up the
poor, to show the Lord’s might.
2. Our family witness opportunities:
a. To demonstrate love and
fidelity between husband and wife.
b. To demonstrate that
children are an heritage of the Lord by hoping for and raising, where possible,
large families of loved and well-trained children.
c. To show responsibility
as good neighbors, making people glad they live near us.
d. To promote the causes of
morality, social responsibility, and righteousness wherever possible and as
appropriate in community, business, cultural, educational and civic affairs.
3. Our institutional witness as a church:
a. We satisfy minds by
having a “complete” theology which squares with the Bible and offers a greatly
expanded horizon of understanding.
b. We offer a corrected
version of the Bible, a second ancient witness of Christ, a testament of Father
Abraham, and modern and current revelation, all of which is self-consistent,
all of which bears witness of God and of his ways.
c. We offer living prophets
who teach us the Restored Gospel and who offer specific guidance on many
practical problems of our time. They give the general guidance which, if
followed, would eventuate in the solution to every human problem.
d. We satisfy body needs by
taking care of our own in disasters and extending such aid to many others.
e. We deploy our might to
achieve a financially sound and strong base for the operations of the Church,
one which practices principles of restraint, responsibility, and conservation.
This witness serves as a model for every person, family and institution
everywhere.
f. We
beautify our buildings and grounds so that all who see or visit are uplifted.
4. Our cultural witness as a people (ideals as much as reality, as yet,
for this is our weakest area of witness):
a. We prize education, hard
work, and problem solving.
b. We prize art,
creativity, and excellence in all skills.
c. We prize everything
which is virtuous, lovely, of good report, or praiseworthy.
d. We prize freedom, representative
government, individual responsibility, economic self-sufficiency.
e. We prize integrity,
modesty, chastity, benevolence, and peace.
C. The essentials of accepting the witness. There are certain
steps which must take place for anyone outside the Church to become a member of
the Church, and have this change be a positive experience in his or her life.
The following steps are taken to be essential in receiving the witness that God
lives, that the Restored Gospel is true and that The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints is the only true and living church upon the earth at the
present time.
1. His or her attention
must be attracted in some honorable way.
2. He or she must pay attention.
A witness is always received in time and space. The space must be small enough
and the time long enough that two things can happen. There must be:
a. Receiving enough
information (the truth about Gospel religious matters) that the recipient can understand
the message and out of that message conceive a significant experiment which he
or she could perform in a short time with the resources which are available.
This experiment will vary according to the present habits, standards, and
beliefs of the recipient. Some principal initial possibilities are:
1) To pray about the
truthfulness of the Restored Gospel (for one who already lives by prayer).
2) To read the Book of
Mormon and pray about it (for one who already cherishes reading the Bible).
3) To have the opportunity
to ask theological questions and to pray about the answers (for one who is
troubled about death, evil in the world, etc., and who prizes clear and
consistent answers to such questions).
4) To search the scriptures
and pray about the First Vision of the Prophet Joseph (for one who is already
religious but believes that the heavens are closed).
5) To associate with and
test the spirit of those who say they have already received and accepted this
witness.
Whatever is the crucial test of other
important matters in life for that (unique) individual is the test which should
be employed initially by that person. This because that is the methodology he
or she already trusts. But whatever else is done, he or she must pray about the
matter also, for there can be no conversion without prayer. Only personal
revelation is rock foundation evidence, a sufficient test; all other tests
leave one upon the sand, even though they may be helpful.
b. Receiving a
manifestation of the warmth and love of God through the presence of the Holy
Spirit. In the end, intellectual matters and tests do not convert; they serve
the necessary and important service of getting a person to have enough time
with and experience of feeling the Holy Spirit to decide to prize or to reject
it. The essence of every conversion to righteousness is prizing of the Spirit
of God. The purpose of insisting upon private personal prayer is that the
recipient must discover that the Holy Spirit is not unique to the source where
first encountered (the missionaries, the message, the meeting, the scriptures),
but can be gained also on one’s knees in one’s own closet.
3. He or she must
personally perform this experiment which has been conceived. No matter how
well-conceived the theory of the experiment might be or how delightful the
warmth of the Holy Spirit have been to the recipient, he or she cannot be
profited if there is no investment and no further benefit. Each must go and do
that thing which they conceive, including praying. If the experiment is
performed as conceived, there will always be an immediate consequence.
4. They must evaluate the
result of that personal experiment. The results of the experiment are either
positive or negative.
The following table shows the basic
possibilities:
Whatever the result, the
recipient uses his or her agency to pursue light and truth or to reject light
and truth.
5. He or she must conceive,
execute, and evaluate a second experiment under the influence of the Holy
Spirit, guided by the missionaries or not. The person must heed the guidance of
the Lord to do the thing that is plainly best to do next. If they perform the
second experiment faithfully and like the result, they are on track to
conversion of themselves to be more like God.
6. At some point after a
finite number of experiments, the recipient must acknowledge the influence of
the Holy Spirit to be the voice of God to them. Then the weak faith of the
experiment turns to strong faith as he or she hears further instruction,
believes it is of God, and diligently obeys in the name of Jesus Christ. Now he
or she is on the rock and can and will go as far in the conversion process as is
desired, even unto becoming gods themselves.
D. The essentials of proselyting. The steps of proselyting are simply
the complements of those which the investigator must take to convert himself.
The work of the proselyter is to bring the freedom to change to the recipient
by opening new options of thinking and feeling. It is almost never necessary or
desirable for the missionary to destroy. The new avenues will give the
recipient his own power to change his own thinking and feeling as is necessary.
1. The missionary must get
the attention of the recipient. The space must be small enough (so that they
are close enough) and the time must be long enough for the two essential
messages to be communicated. Traditional devices for getting attention are:
a. Tracting
b. Street meetings
c. Tracts
d. Referrals
e. Hall meetings
f. Teaching English etc.
Ingenuity and propriety are the
great guides to attention getting.
2. The message must be
delivered. While the investigator is paying attention the missionaries must:
a. Communicate enough
information that the recipient willbe
instructed and can conceive of a meaningful first experiment about the
truthfulness and/or efficacy of the Restored Gospel.
b. Communicate enough of
the Holy Spirit that the recipient will have tasted the spirit and thereby be
able to identify it when it returns during his or her experiment.
3. The recipient must be so
convinced of the need to perform the experiment, including praying, that he/she
actually does perform it. Nothing else can succeed if this step fails. For
greatest success, the experiment must be performed by the investigator in
private (not in front of the missionary nor in front of his family or friends).
4. The missionary must
encourage a candid evaluation by the investigator of the results of the
experiment as soon as possible after it is performed. The result is the cue to the
missionary as to whether to continue his proselyting effort with this
individual or not.
5. The missionary must
assist the investigator to conceive, execute, and evaluate a second experiment
if the investigator has not already done so. Usually this second experiment
willarise naturally out of further
discussion of Gospel principles.
6. When the experiments
become faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, the person is ready for baptism
(previously committed to baptism or not). When faith has taken root in the scriptures,
in prayer and in beneficence, the missionaries’ work is done. There are branch
presidents, bishops, stake presidents and others in the Church to assist in the
perfecting of that faith.
Part VIII: Obstacles to
Conversion
A. The world. The world (the kingdom of Satan on the earth, which
includes his devotees and their hearts, might, minds, and strength, his
governments, his cultures, his church) is not of itself an obstacle to
conversion, but rather creates the occasion and opportunity for conversion.
That is why we must be in the world (to make converts) but not of it. If we are
of (belong to, are converted to) the Lord, He will give us power that the gates
of hell (the powers of the kingdom of Satan to take and keep prisoners) will
not prevail against us: we will be able to bring the blessings of the Lord,
through the priesthood, to Satan’s prisoners. The difficulty in conversion is
not the world itself, but it is worldliness in us, as individuals, as we
attempt to convert ourselves so that we might represent our God faithfully and
well in honoring His priesthood.
B. The world in our minds. The Gospel was restored at the peak
strength of the Protestant Worldview in America. The early embers of the Church
were firmly based in that tradition and the Restoration in many ways simply
built bigger and better things on that foundation. That Protestant World view,
which was essentially the foundation used by the founding fathers in the
framing of the U. S. Constitution, began its downhill slide from influence in
the first half of the 19th Century and has steadily lost ground for 130 years.
The LDS Church has emerged as the champion of most of the causes Protestantism
once espoused such as the integrity of the U. S. Constitution, hard work,
thrift, and self-sufficiency. The demise of Protestantism is being brought by
incessant attacks on the two support pillars of Protestantism: the divinity of
the Bible (especially the New Testament) and the divinity of the human
conscience.
The engines
which are battering these pillars down are scholarship and science in the hands
of those of the Humanist worldview persuasion. Scholarship has been used (with
considerable bias and skill) to destroy the claim that the Bible is an
authentic historic document: the Humanist version is that the Bible is a
collection of pleasant but sometimes gory myths. (For those founded upon the
rock, the Bible still has its integrity and the attacks upon the Bible willeventually be seen to be but the
opinions of ungodly men.) Science has been used (with considerable bias and
skill) to assert the relativity of conscience to social context: the Humanist
prescription is to get rid of conscience wherever and whenever possible,
substituting collectivist and rationalist norms. (Again, those founded upon the
rock are not swayed by this intellectual dissimulation.)
The rise of
Humanism in the United States came as the university system of Europe was
imported (the rise of Humanism in Europe was the Renaissance). Today the
overwhelming majority of university professors, students and graduates are
Humanist in outlook. The Protestant churches have become more and more
Humanist, substituting political action as their cause to supplant the old
emphasis on personal morality. The Catholic Church has abandoned its Medieval
Worldview and now has an essentially Humanist face (the present Pope seems to
be holding back the change somewhat). There is a remnant of Protestant strength
among the Lutherans, the Methodists, and the Baptists (recently galvanized into
the “Moral Majority”) but that waning power cannot last long. The average
American youngster does not know who Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are (some
Rock group?).
The rise of
Humanism in the United States has seen a rise in Humanism within the LDS
Church. Before World War II, a solid majority of the people of the Church who
took advanced degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities became at least
partly Humanist in their outlook. A turning point came in 1938 with the talk
given by President J. Reuben Clark entitled “The Charted Course of the Church
in Education.” Since World War II Humanism has not been as powerful an
influence on Church members studying for advanced degrees. Since the 1950s,
Humanism in the Church has had to go on the defensive side as a resurgence of
the Restored Gospel worldview has seen a cessation of the honoring of Humanism
in the Church.
The basic
problem that all of the above is pertinent to is that faith and intellect have
never been fully and successfully yoked together in the Church in this
dispensation in very many individuals. Sometimes the artists are more artist
than Latter-day Saints; sometimes the educationists, historians, the
philosophers, the social scientists, the biologists, and the other natural
scientists are likewise afflicted; seemingly least afflicted are the engineers.
A special
false idea which plagues our people, educated and uneducated alike, is the
“romantic” frame of mind. The romantic notion is that great things can be
accomplished with little causes, that one can get something for nothing, or
that an insufficient means can bring about a desired result. The fairy tales
and cultural traditions of western civilization are shot through with romantic
notions which lead to such things as the belief that the public treasury is
inexhaustible, that well-being is due to luck, that romantic infatuation
without repentance will bring marital bliss etc. Humanism and socialism are
both species of the romantic fallacy. One glaring example in the Church is
people who think that the temple ordinances will “save” them, make them perfect
in the next life, without the necessity of their own painstaking and deliberate
repentance to rid their own minds, hearts and flesh of every ungodly habit in
this life.
When these
problems are solved and the “educated” people of the Church begin to serve the
Lord with all of their hearts and minds, then the witness the Church bears to
the world will greatly increase. Then we will be as far ahead in science as we
are in theology. Then it will be much easier to get the attention of the
educated people of the world to show them a better way.
C. The world in our hearts. For the first eight years of this
dispensation the Lord sought diligently to get the members of His Church to
love Him enough that they would trust in His instruction as to how to gain
their temporal well-being. With some notable exceptions the members could not
convert themselves that far and that fast; most preferred to gain temporal
security by relying on their old stand-by; every-man-for-himself. So the Lord
withdrew the active implementation of the law of consecration. A later notable
attempt in the West to begin active implementation of consecration had some
remarkable and hopeful successes, but each experiment ended in failure and we
returned to every-man-for-himself. Hearts and minds failed as the influence of
the world welled up among us.
The Depression of the 1930s saw another
attempt to get the members to love the Lord with the beginning of the Church
Welfare Plan. Augmented by later increased emphasis on fast offering, there is
now more caring than there previously appeared to be. The Church has become a
model for the world not of real caring for the poor but of
a-step-in-the-right-direction of caring for the poor. It is still mostly every-man-for-himself
in the Church.
The rival way, the way of the world to
care for the poor, is socialism, which is the political and economic arm of
Humanism. Socialism is winning hands down in the world because the moral base
which made the every-man-for-himself system have a great deal of brotherly
kindness has eroded and virtually disappeared with the demise of the Protestant
worldview and its (Humanist despised) work ethic.
The step-in-the-right-direction of the
Church is good, but it does not bear full witness to the world of the pure love
of Christ. In fact, it does not solve the whole problem even in the Church. But
should the faithful members of this Church ever unitedly implore the Lord that
His full kingdom truly be implemented, because of their love for Him, the full
implementation of the law of consecration would bear a witness that would set
the world on its ear. That would plainly show socialism for what it is: feeble
human theory captured in every practical example for another species of tyranny.
But the world will never see a full alternative to tyranny until Latter-day
Saints so love the Lord that they implement His full plan. Then the world will
have witness indeed, for that would put us as far ahead of the world in
economics and politics (and thus, in heart) as we are in theology. Then, too,
we would enjoy the abundance of the gifts of the spirit, which would further increase
our dissimilarity from the world.
Another
malaise of heart which affects our people is worldly feelings about feelings.
The world would have everyone believe that we humans are not responsible for
what we feel, but are passive objects worked upon by environmental forces that
control our moods, values, etc. They tell us that human beings are not free
agents and that either God or one’s psychiatrist will have to step in to save
one. The LDS perversity along this line is to feel put-upon by Church authorities,
to justify anger in “righteous” causes, to justify lust for another and
adultery when one’s spouse is not perfect, to be envious of the wealthy, to
despise the poor to be forever unsatisfied with one’s lot. All of these sins
are manifestations of yielding one’s heart to Satan, even though one may be an
active member of the Church. The Lord would have us forgive all men, that the
sin of any other person would never become either a mental self-justification
for sin nor an emotional occasion for feeling sorry for oneself. The mark of
love for God is gratitude, for everything, and fear of nothing. But because we
do not forgive and do not love God as we should, the world has great purchase
upon us.
D. The world in our strength and in our might. While the
leadership of the Church has directed us to be distinctive in our dress and
grooming it has never directed us to be drastically different. The missionary
look is our standard, but adherence to the standard suffers. Not every member
believes in “every member a missionary.”
As a Church we are somewhat distinctive as
to our standard of the Word of Wisdom. Adherence to the standard seems to
improve with each added generation in families in the Church. The standard is
minimal (for the weakest of the Saints), but higher standards fall on hard
times because some members want to become the voice of the Lord in announcing
higher standards (their own version for everyone). Withal, there remains a
serious Word of Wisdom problem among Church members which dilutes our witness
of the Lord to the world.
For all of our problems with the Word of
Wisdom area, the Church appears to have greater distinctive difference from the
world in that area than it does in the most important area of strength, that of
chastity. One of the sorrowful burdens of being a judge in Israel is to come to
know the enormity of this problem. Our witness falters when our statistics on
divorce, abortion, non-temple marriage, and childbirth out of wedlock are
reviewed by the world. To be better than most is not really good enough to bear
a valid witness of love of the true and living God.
These matters of our strength—dress and grooming,
Word of Wisdom, chastity—are parallel to our problems of might. Our problems of
might are avarice (we are the swindle capital), slovenliness (some of these
barns and fences Brigham Young wanted painted still are not), ostentation
(mansions now, not when heaven comes), mediocrity (it’s the thought that
counts), procrastination (who needs a garden?), etc. These problems of strength
and might which dilute and defeat our witness are symptoms, not causes. When
our hearts and minds become pure, these symptoms will disappear. Apparently the
Lord expects that half of the Church will become pure. Then that half will bear
an unimpeachable witness; to the world that will
touch every nation, kindred, tongue, and people.
E. Conclusion. Not only can we have too many chiefs and not enough
Indians, we can also have too many Indians and not enough chiefs. It is
possible that the success of the missionary program of the Church could
actually set the Church back in the future because we might not have enough
leadership in the Church which is converted to more than the Church to draw the
new converts up to the higher stages of conversion by their love. Attention to
every stage of conversion simultaneously might help. At any rate, the Church
will do better if the worldliness among us is reduced by further
self-conversion through following the authorities of the Church as they lead us
step-by-step toward our goal. Heaven is our home, and we must create that
heaven here, and (hopefully) now, through the opportunity of self-conversion
using the power of God which is among us.
Part IX: Summary
Conversion is a change of habits. It begins in an honest
heart which admits that the Spirit of God has prompted it to change, to repent.
The mind must begin to understand the way of the Lord. The heart must choose
the way of the Lord. The body must act in the way of the Lord. These changes of
heart, mind and strength will result in visible changes in the stewardship
(dominion, might) of every converted person.
But conversion is not a one-time thing. It is an uphill
battle, proceeding in small daily steps each of which must be taken by the
deliberate choice of a free agent. There is no “great help” upward. To change
from the natural man to become like God is to repent (to change, to convert
each step) as the Lord shows us how, line upon line, grace upon grace, until we
receive a fulness. There is as much conversion that needs to take place within
the Church as there is outside the Church as each person goes to his God and
implores Him for permission and direction to take one more step each day.
Anyone can begin to repent (to educate, to improve himself) anywhere, at any
time, simply by beginning to be fully faithful to what he himself knows is
right (by hearkening to his own conscience).
Potential additions to this study.
1. An explanation of the
Medieval, Protestant, Humanist, and Restored Gospel worldviews as referred to
in Part VIII.
2. A description of the
social class structure of the Church and how it helps and impedes the work of
conversion in and to the Church.
3. A description of LDS
culture, differentiating which parts are Gospel-oriented and which are not.
4. Pattern of institutional
religions in addition to the ones given.
5. A section on practical
suggestions for proselyting work to reach special populations such as:
Humanists
Artists
Intellectuals
Lower class
Etc.
6. A description of
empirical studies which could be conducted to verify and clarify aspects of the
conversion process.
Korihor:
Korihor appears out of nowhere, as it were, in the Nephite record. His entire story is contained in Alma 30, where he suddenly appears in the land of Zarahemla, preaching “unto the people against the prophecies which had been spoken by the prophets, concerning the coming of Christ.” (Alma 30:6.) What we know of his background is mostly from inference, but his arguments show that he was an educated man, in sophistry if not in the scriptures. But we know from his own final admission that Korihor once had a testimony: “I also knew that there was a God. But behold, the devil hath deceived me. … And I have taught his words; and I taught them because they were pleasing unto the carnal mind, … insomuch that I verily believed that they were true.” (Alma 30:52–53.) Thus Korihor’s life teaches us that having the truths of the gospel and being a covenant servant of Christ are in nowise guarantees of salvation. We are also reminded that the most powerful opposition to the work of the Savior on this earth comes from those who know the truth and then deliberately turn from it and seek to destroy others.
Korihor took what might be called a philosophical approach to destroying faith in our Savior, an approach remarkably similar to that taken by many persons today in semiphilosophical attempts to “relieve” believers of what they are pleased to call their “naivete.” His arguments could not hurt those whose belief was born of genuine spiritual experience, but they were powerfully effective among those weak in the faith whose belief had not yet gone beyond words. An analysis of those arguments helps us to see how we can be strong in the faith in Christ. Let us select three of his arguments as examples.
We begin with Korihor’s argument for naturalistic empiricism (the belief that it is possible to know all truth through the senses—by experience and observation):
“Behold, these things which ye call prophecies, which ye say are handed down by holy prophets, behold, they are foolish traditions of your fathers.
“How do ye know of their surety? Behold, ye cannot know of things which ye do not see; therefore ye cannot know that there shall be a Christ.” (Alma 30:14–15.)
Now it is plain that empiricism has value. It is good for us to observe our surroundings carefully and to appreciate our sensations. How else would we walk or drive an automobile? Without sensation, how could we know beauty or communicate with friends and loved ones or appreciate the marvelous handiwork of the creations of our God? Sense experience is indeed a valuable part of this life; the error comes in supposing that it is the only way of knowing what we know.
What can our senses tell us about justice or mercy or the future? Nothing. Indeed, it works the other way. Only when we have acquired by some nonempirical means the concepts of justice and mercy, or an idea about some future event—only then can we recognize the significance of our sensory experiences relating to justice and mercy or the fulfillment of prophecy.
None of the more important questions we ask can be solved or answered by depending solely on sensation. Is there a God? Is man immortal? Is it good to be honest? What should I do next in my life? The answers to each and all of these more important questions must come by faith. Every man answers these questions and makes the great decisions of his life on the basis of his belief in and acceptance of someone or something he cannot see. No man knows by his senses that each man has a spirit separate from his physical body, but some have a testimony of that fact gained by faith.
The answer to Korihor is plain and simple: Our initial acceptance of Christ is not empirical, for we do not see him. But we have received into our lives a Holy Spirit that teaches us to understand the scriptures about Christ and to believe that he lives. We do not pretend that this is yet knowledge. It is faith. We believe in Christ without having seen him because we trust this Holy Spirit that has taught us so many good things. Korihor might by his argument be able to confuse someone who had never had revelation, but his contention is only a pathetic childishness to those who enjoy the companionship of the Holy Ghost.
A second argument used by Korihor might be called his humanism. In concert with the other humanists of the world, he insists that achievement and success come by human means, such as physical strength, skill, and reason:
“And many more such things did he say unto them, telling them that there could be no atonement made for the sins of men, but every man fared in this life according to the management of the creature; therefore every man prospered according to his genius, and that every man conquered according to his strength.” (Alma 30:17.)
Korihor would have us believe, like some authors of modern “success” books, that the solutions to our problems lie in sharp thinking and realistic approaches to life. But such persons define success in terms of wealth, social status, political power, and the glutting of the senses; and, as the servants of Christ know, if selfish attainments are one’s goal, the world is so constructed that one can indeed ignore the Savior and attain. But Korihor and his fellow humanists think that they are masterfully doing it on their own, not realizing that those who succeed at the expense of faith and love are on a down escalator and are being carefully guided, encouraged, aided, and comforted by their unseen mentor Satan. Their glorying in their own strength and accomplishments is a tribute to the cleverness of Satan, that devil who greases the sluiceway of sin.
Conversely, those who have accepted the gospel see that real success in this world is overcoming selfishness and turning one’s strength to righteousness, to blessing others. They know full well that this kind of success is an uphill, strained effort into the very teeth of the forces that make sin so easy. They know that it is not by any human means that one can overcome the world. After all we can do by human power, we are still nothing. It is only when the grace of God touches our lives that we can overcome evil and enact the precious mercies of righteousness. There can be no boasting, no pretension that anything human prospers us. The glory is all given unto God by those who are more than armchair servants of the Master.
The humanist argument is very persuasive to many because it is flattering. We do not naturally like to believe that without Him we can do nothing. Thus part of Satan’s entourage includes those who know the gospel is true but who insist they really don’t need much help except for a pointer or two and a little assistance in being resurrected. The servant of Christ is not persuaded, however. Long pleading with the Lord has stripped him of all humanistic pride.
A third argument used by Korihor is that of relativism: “… and whatsoever a man did was no crime.” (Alma 30:17.) A fuller statement of this attack by Korihor is as follows: Since (he claims) there is no god and men do not live after death, and since (he claims) all so-called “laws” and “commandments” are but social conveniences to give power to priests, the only important thing in life is to do what you want to do—if you can get away with it. How modern Korihor sounds! But the argument is timeless, as old as sin itself.
There are, of course, many versions of relativism (one would hardly expect relativism to be absolute). One version encourages enjoyment of the Church social organization without getting uptight about theology or religious commandments.
Another kind of relativism says that the commandments are great but open to broad private interpretation. A third acknowledges that there are commandments, but allows indulgence in sin since “nobody’s perfect.” A fourth version says that the commandments were okay when they were given, but they have become superfluous in our enlightened age. A fifth kind of relativism, that used by Korihor, says that the commandments were bad from the first; they are inhibitions on the soul of man that actually prevent him from ever achieving happiness. A sixth type, also used by Korihor, says that since one act is indifferent from another, it doesn’t matter what we do.
The great power of all relativistic approaches is that they allow the individual to judge his own actions. This is why almost any of the approaches strikes a responsive, sympathetic chord in all other relativists. Korihor found many who were pleased with his relativism, even though they may have rejected much else of what he said. “And thus he did preach unto them, leading away the hearts of many, causing them to lift up their heads in their wickedness.” (Alma 30:18.)
In stark contrast to the virtually infinite number of personal choices available in the broad way of relativism is the way of the Savior. That strait and narrow way is to do as he did: not to seek our own will, but to do the will of Him who sent us. It is to obey him in all things, obeying his word, which is his law, as it is freshly written in our hearts from revelation to revelation. It is to rely solely upon his merits, counting him as the only fountain of righteousness. It is being willing to die for his sake, crucifying the old person with worldly wants and desires in order to be born again “as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father.” (Mosiah 3:19.)
Thus the gospel teaches a way that is absolute—absolute in that the formula for righteousness is always the same for every person and for every time and circumstance: take the name of Christ, always remember him, keep all of the commandments that he gives unto us. There is no other way to righteousness, for whatsoever is not of faith in Christ is sin.
Now it is little wonder that Korihor found much success in commending relativism to the members of the church in his time. For while the Church is true, the members of the Church here on earth have not yet overcome the world, although most are still trying. For many, the effort is hard, the price too great. Whether they leave the Church or not, they abandon the narrow way and settle for some variety of relativism.
But there is one thing relativism can never do, even within the Church. One who subscribes to any of the versions of relativism just listed will never (unless he repents) be brought to those sacrifices that will prepare his soul to spend an eternity in blessing others. Relativism can never purify heart and mind, or transform body and countenance into the image of the Savior.
Thanks be to our God that there is a way, strait and narrow though it be, to learn to love with a pure love! But the price is great. We must place all of our heart, might, mind, and strength at his disposal—always. We must count as dross and expendable everything of this world, including our own lives. This does not mean to deny life, but to live fully, enjoying the companionship of the Holy Ghost, working in a crescendo of works of love that will take us without faltering through the veil to results only understood in eternity.
Korihor was not unique to Book of Mormon times. His counterparts have always been with the Church, and they will now but increase in flattery and fury until the end of the world. What will prevent us from succumbing to their sophistries? The following are offered as a time-tested prescription against apostasy.
1. Hunger and thirst after righteousness. Blessed are they who do so, “for they shall be filled with the Holy Ghost.” (3 Ne. 12:6.) Righteousness is to bless others, to minister to their needs, both temporal and spiritual. The great enemy of righteousness is not only evil; plain old-fashioned evil fools few. A more subtle and therefore more dangerous enemy is self-righteousness, supposing that what pleases us will be good for others.
Perhaps the great divider between the seekers of righteousness and the self-righteous is that those who hunger and thirst after true righteousness cannot rest until satisfaction and happiness come to those whom they strive to help. They hurt when others hurt. The self-righteous are often deed-conscious rather than people-conscious. They seem to glory in forms and traditions, formulas and standards. They cast alms to the poor without loving them or stopping to discern what the real problem might be.
Those who seek true righteousness quickly learn one thing—their own impotence. They find they are not knowledgeable enough, nor wise enough, nor powerful enough to bless others as their hearts desire. Their hunger for righteousness has prepared them for the gospel, and when they hear its good news they leap at the opportunity to make the covenant to love the Savior and to receive his Spirit to be with them.
2. Learn to live by the Holy Spirit. The Spirit teaches us the truth of the gospel. But it is another thing to learn to live by the Holy Spirit. The difference is like hearing a violin concert expertly performed and acknowledging its merit, then personally mastering the violin to be able to play as expertly ourselves.
This mastery is a matter of constant, faithful application of our will power. There are no quantum leaps to righteousness, only the slow adding of line to line, precept to precept, grace upon grace. In this remaking of our lives, every improper thought, every bad habit, every evil desire must sooner or later be evaluated against the glory of our Savior. We, not he, must make each painful choice to prove all things, then to hold fast to that which is good.
How many experiments and experiences are necessary? Only enough to enable us to give our selves, to yield our hearts unto the Savior; enough experiments to know the voice of the Savior beyond any shadow of doubt; enough experiences of obedience to learn to love with pure love and to continue therein.
3. Support priesthood authority. Those who have learned to walk in the Spirit also rejoice in the opportunity to sustain their priesthood-appointed leaders with faith and prayers. They know by the repeated testimony of the Spirit that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the kingdom of God on the earth and that those who serve over them in the callings of the priesthood are appointed and sustained by the Savior. As servants of the Savior, they, too, sustain.
Because they sustain they become the united power and strength that the Church organization brings to the work of righteousness in the world. They sustain in love even as they hope to be sustained. They always sustain in faith and righteousness, receiving instruction from the Savior and obeying him in all things.
4. Build the kingdom. Living in righteousness makes possible the establishment of Zion on earth again. What careful priesthood labor there must be to bring the gathered remnants to see eye to eye, having one mind and one heart, dwelling in righteousness with no poor among them! Then the kingdoms of this world will be constrained to admit that this is indeed the kingdom of God and his Christ, for the inhabitants will love one another, even as Christ loves them. Those who support have the joy of seeing the prophecies fulfilled before their very eyes.
He or she who has a shoulder to the wheel, who honors and trusts the driver of the wagon, who knows he is doing the right thing in the right cause is not taken in by the glitter of apostasy. But what of those not so mature in the work of the Lord? Is there any guaranteed way to prevent apostasy of the newborn or the weak and infirm? The honest answer is no. The love and patience of those who are mature will shelter some of them for a time. But ultimately there is no outside shelter—the only, effective shelter is a personal faith, a personal testimony. In every generation Korihor takes his toll of those who will not get themselves founded on the Rock.
[illustration] Korihor demanded a sign; so Alma said to him, “In the name of God, ye shall be struck dumb, that ye shall no more have utterance.” (Alma 30:49.) (Illustrated by Ted Henninger.)
Chauncey C. Riddle, an assistant academic vice-president over graduate studies and curriculum at Brigham Young University, serves as a high councilor in the BYU Ninth Stake and as a Sunday School teacher in the Orem Sixteenth Ward, Orem Utah Sharon Stake.
Chauncey C. Riddle, “Trusted with Great Knowledge,” Ensign, Feb. 1977, page 86
Morality is another term for faithfulness. To be moral in the restored gospel is to obey the Savior in all things. Why obey him in all things? Because he is a God of righteousness. He does not command by whim, but only by that which is righteous according to a standard that coexists with him.
I understand righteousness is to bless others. Only in Christ do men know how to bless others and only from him can they receive the power to bless others sufficient to the needs of mankind, for the Savior is the sole fountain of righteousness. Those who hunger and thirst after righteousness are his sheep. They hearken to his voice and come unto him, that they might fill them with the Holy Ghost.
Those who obey his commandments are thus moral. Being moral, they can then be trusted with great knowledge, for they will not abuse it. They will only use it to further the cause of righteousness in the earth.
Chauncey C. Riddle
Dean of the Graduate School
Brigham Young University
Son. Dad, the bishop talked with me this morning about receiving the Melchizedek Priesthood. He said that one of the things I should do is talk to you about what it really means to have the priesthood.
Father. I’m grateful the bishop gave you that assignment, Paul, because priesthood is very special to me. We have discussed the priesthood many times before, so where would you like to begin? Do you have some special questions?
Son. Let’s pretend I have never heard about priesthood before. Could I ask you some basic questions to help me see the whole picture at once?
Father. Fire away.
Son. First of all, what is it?
Father. Simply stated, priesthood is the delegated power and authority to represent Jesus Christ.
Son. But why Jesus? Why don’t we represent our Father in heaven?
Father. Are you thinking about the fact that all human beings are children of God the Father?
Son. Yes. And so is Jesus.
Father. That is true, but there is something different about our Savior. He was our eldest brother when we lived with our Heavenly Father. Then he was given a very special assignment. He was chosen by the Father to organize this earth, to people it with others of the Father’s children, to govern it, and to bless, through the atonement, each person who would come here. The rest of us didn’t get that assignment; it was a stewardship given to one person only.
Son. You don’t mean that he has to do all those things all by himself!
Father. No, indeed. He has many who help him, and that is precisely where priesthood comes in. But the Savior is the head. He is the one to whom the Father has given total responsibility for this earth and all things that pertain to it. The Father so loved us that he sent Jesus to create this world, then sent him into this world to suffer and die that he might save us.
Son. But why was Jesus chosen to be that one, the Savior?
Father. I’m sure I don’t know all the reasons, but one I do believe: I think the Father chose Jesus to represent him because of the great and pure love that Jesus had in the premortal existence. Jesus loved the Father and obeyed him in all things. But he also had a pure love for others, for us. Because Jesus’ love was pure, with no shred of selfishness or self-seeking in it, the Father knew he could trust Jesus to be solely responsible for this earth.
Son. Didn’t anyone else have that pure love?
Father. My guess is that there were others. But the Father’s house is a house of order. He appointed one only to be the head. When he, the Father, speaks to men, he has only one thing to say to them at first. He says to men, “This is my beloved son. Hear him.” (Joseph Smith 2:17; see also, e.g., Matt. 3:17, 17:5.) Those who keep that commandment can receive all blessings on earth and in heaven through him, through Jesus Christ. Thus the Savior has become the great High Priest, the only source of the blessings of the Father for this earth. When we receive the priesthood it is the Savior’s authority we receive. That’s why it is called “The Holy Priesthood, after the Order of the Son of God.” (See D&C 107:3)
Son. I can see why there should be only one person to represent the Father. But I’m still worried about all the other people who also had, or have, great love for the Father and for others. What happens to them?
Father. I believe that many of those who also have that pure love are the noble and great ones that father Abraham mentioned. The Savior makes them his rulers on earth. (See Abr. 3:22-23.)
Son. That’s kind of hard to believe when you look at some rulers during the different dispensations of time.
Father. Indeed, if you look at most temporal rulers. The scriptures aren’t talking about kings, generals, and presidents, however. The Savior’s rulers are those who he appoints to transmit the blessings of eternity to their fellowmen. They are the bearers of his priesthood.
Son. You are saying that the Savior chooses out of the people of this earth certain ones of those who have pure love and gives them his priesthood so they can bless others? That sounds good, but I have a hard time relating that idea to what I see in the Church. I see some good people who have the priesthood. But I also see some others who don’t seem to have much love for anybody, let alone pure love.
Father. ‘Tis high to be a judge, Paul. But I agree with you. We can’t honestly say that everyone who has been ordained to the priesthood is what he ought to be.
Son. The way you are describing it, it sounds as if a person would have to be perfect to exercise the Savior’s priesthood fully.
Father. Scary though it sounds, that is very near to the truth as I understand it. When the Savior was telling his disciple in Judea about what is expected of us, they began to despair and asked, “Who, then, can be saved?” His answer is the only hope; he told them that with man, such perfection is impossible, but that with God all good things are possible. (See Matt. 19:23-26.) Does that answer make sense to you?
Son. I guess that means men can’t be perfect unless God helps them.
Father. Right! That is part of what the scriptures mean when they say we are saved by grace — but only after we do all we can. (See 2 Ne. 25:23.)
Son. I hate to be pessimistic, but I still can’t believe that most of the people I know in the priesthood have a perfect love.
Father. Paul, the thing that is remarkable is not that some people don’t have that perfect love: the miracle is that some do. It helps if we separate beginnings and endings.
The beginning is that no human being as he is naturally upon the earth is smart enough or good enough to represent the Savior perfectly and show forth the pure love in blessing others. So there needs to be a process of enlarging and purifying someone who is to represent the Savior.
The beginning of that process is accepting the gospel; we must confess our weakness and covenant with the Savior in baptism to take upon us his name, to remember him always, and to obey all the instructions he gives to us. Those are the promises you priests repeat every time you consecrate the bread in the administration of the sacrament.
Son. Yes, I remember those ideas. But are promises enough?
Father. Not enough, but the necessary beginning. When we make those promises at baptism we are then given the blessing of having, and the commandment to receive, the Holy Ghost.
Son. When we are confirmed?
Father. Right. The privilege of having the Holy Ghost is one of the most marvelous things any person can have, for that influence teaches us how to begin to think and feel as the Savior does, and brings us instruction from the Savior. You remember that John the Baptist baptized with water. But he knew that the baptism of fire and the Holy Ghost that the Savior would bring was so much greater that he felt he was not worthy to untie the Savior’s shoes. It is the transforming power of the Holy Ghost that helps us to change so that we can be worthy and honorable bearers of the holy priesthood.
Son. How does the Aaronic Priesthood fit into this?
Father. Just as John came baptizing with water to prepare disciples whom the Savior could then baptize with the Holy Ghost, so the Aaronic Priesthood is given as a preparation for receiving the Melchizedek Priesthood. You learned as a deacon to pass the sacrament and to collect fast offering. As a teacher you began home teaching. As a priest you have been privileged to consecrate the emblems of the sacrament and to begin missionary work and perform baptism. All this time you have worked with the bishop in projects around the chapel, on the welfare farm, and in helping people in the ward. Now which of the fellows your age are being given the Melchizedek Priesthood?
Son. Right now it’s the ones who have done a good job as priests.
Father. Sure. If a young man has learned to be diligent, faithful, and obedient in temporal matters, that is a marvelous preparation to become a minister in spiritual matters. When he goes on his mission at age nineteen he is already a veteran in the service of our Savior. The attitudes and habits that a faithful priest has are his foundation for all of the callings of the higher priesthood. If he has learned to work under the authority of the priesthood in the Church and to live by the promptings of the Holy Spirit, then he is ready to do the work of love. Make no mistake, Paul: whether you serve as a missionary, as a worker in the Church organization, or as a husband and father, your real success in these priesthood callings will be measured by the depth and purity of your selfless love and concern for others.
Son. Are you saying that it’s difficult to show your love for others if you have never learned to be orderly and efficient in temporal things?
Father. I am indeed. A missionary who is lazy or unkempt or disobedient has a hard time convincing people that the restored gospel is something special. An elders quorum president who never keeps track of anything has a difficult time motivating anyone to excel. A husband who won’t work hard to provide for his family or who thinks first of his own pleasure is surely not going to lead his family to the Savior.
Son. I can see how all these things as functions of the Aaronic Priesthood are good. But there’s got to be more to it than that.
Father. And there is. We have been talking only about the foundation of pure love. We must add to that foundation great knowledge, skill, wisdom, and the ability to understand people and their needs. These things are all gifts of the Spirit. Those who repent of their sins and who then hunger and thirst to bless others are filled with the Holy Ghost. Then those gifts begin to flow to them.
Let’s look at a precious scripture, Paul. Could you turn to Doctrine and Covenants 121? The part from verse 34 to the end is so important that I think every bearer of the priesthood would do well to commit it to memory, word perfect, and repeat it to himself often.
Notice verses 34 and 40. We are told that many are called but few are chosen — and why? Verse 35 tells us we must not be turned aside by desires for things of the world or the honors of men. Our objective in the priesthood should be to serve and to bless.
Verse 36 shows us that we cannot use the priesthood except by the powers of heaven; specifically I understand that to mean that we must have the Holy Spirit with us to exercise the priesthood. It says further that we can’t have the powers and gifts of the Spirit unless we are living righteously.
Verse 37 tells us that if we let the things of the world turn us aside, the Holy Spirit will withdraw from us, and when it is gone, our power in the priesthood is gone. We must be honest, true, chaste, benevolent — all the good things — to use the priesthood power properly and righteously.
Verse 38 recounts how people who won’t repent are disappointed in their priesthood opportunities. Then they turn and fight the priesthood.
Verse 39 witnesses that most people who receive the priesthood try to use it by force and domination instead of out of purity and love.
Now I hope you see that verse 40 answers the question you had about brethren of the priesthood who don’t seem to manifest much love. They have been given the opportunity to repent and do the works of love, but most people who are ordained to the priesthood — as it says here, “called” — do not rise to the occasion. Thus, few are chosen; few will have that priesthood eternally.
You see, we don’t accept the gospel and come into the Savior’s church because we are perfect, but rather that we may become perfect. We don’t receive the priesthood because we are like the Savior, but so that through doing his work, we may grow to be as he is. In his great love he labors with us, helping us grow step by step, calling by calling in the kingdom. I’m sure he sorrows when those who bear his priesthood turn away and value the things of the world more than eternal life.
Now do you see why I said that there is a difference between beginnings and endings? All of us are unworthy in the beginning, but some grow to be worthy of it in the end.
Son. Dad, I want to serve the Savior and to bless others. What can I do to be sure that I won’t turn away?
Father. The best that I know, Paul, is to plead with the Lord every day for help, then to hold fast to the iron rod. (See 1 Ne. 15:23-25.) I suppose the biggest temptation we have is just to let go of the rod, to take a vacation from righteousness. I think it helps to focus on the positive side. If we keep in mind what we can do and should do, that makes Satan’s temptations less alluring. Notice Doctrine and Covenants 121, verses 41 and 42. We are to use our priesthood “by persuasions, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, by love unfeigned; by kindness and pure knowledge.” If we looked at ourselves in the mirror every morning and let those words pass through our minds, perhaps we would become like Nephi of old and tremble at the very thought of sinning.
Son. Isn’t it discouraging, thinking how good we have to be?
Father. It could be. And I get discouraged sometimes. But I am spurred on by things I can hope for. Hand me that Inspired Version of the Bible, Paul. Notice here in Genesis 14 what it says about Melchizedek and the priesthood. If we are willing to press on, we are promised that when we are faithful and it is right to do so, we will be able to divide seas, to break mountains, to break every band, to stand in the presence of God. I long to be able to heal the sick, to bless those who mourn, to lead Mother and all of you children to the Savior. I long to live in a Zion where the Savior will rule personally and all will know him. But I know that these good things can be only as we learn to exercise the holy priesthood in the full power of righteousness. Then we can fulfill the promises of the Lord in that beautiful passage in Mosiah 8: “Thus God has provided a means that man, through faith, might work mighty miracles; therefore he becometh a great benefit to his fellow beings.” (Verse 18.)
Son. I hope we can do it, Dad.
Father. We can if we stick together and reinforce each other, Paul. The greatest thing in my life has been the unfolding of the understanding I have of the goodness of the Savior to us. Most of that has come since I received the priesthood and began to serve in the Church. I’m so thankful for the special people who have stood at the crossroads of my life and taught me of the love of the Savior.
Son. Who were they?
Father. There were several, but let me mention three in particular.
One was my deacons quorum adviser. He taught us deacons much about the gospel. I can still see him sitting on the little chairs of the Junior Sunday School room, with tears streaming down his face as he told us about the atonement and how the Savior loved the Father and us enough to be perfect.
Another was the stake high councilor who worked with me when I was a struggling student and elders quorum president. He taught me to love the words of the prophets and to know how to live by the Spirit. He was also the stake patriarch. He gave me a blessing that has strengthened and guided me ever since.
The third person has had the most profound effect of all That person is your mother, Paul. When we were married in the temple we were babes in the woods. We often laugh now at how naive and innocent of understanding we were. But we began to grow together. We read the scriptures together. We worked in the Church together. We suffered and we scrimped and saved together. Sometimes we were hard on each other because we were afraid. But one of the great blessings of my life has been your mother’s love for me, Paul. That has given me courage and strength and has taught me what love is truly all about.
The people who have helped me have shown me that we need each other. My guess is that we can become like the Savior only by working together so that we grow together in his likeness.
Son. I hope I can work with people who love the Lord.
Father. The most precious opportunity you will have to do that will be in your marriage, Paul. All of the functions and purposes of marriage and family are connected inseparably with the operations and authority of the holy priesthood. If you do what you know you should, you and your wife will build an eternal priesthood kingdom in which to bless your own posterity forever.
I hope you will seek out one of our Father’s daughters who is strong in the faith and is willing to grow in spirituality. Your temple marriage will give you a priesthood opportunity as big and as wide as eternity. If you and your wife can learn to love each other and your children purely and selflessly in the gospel bonds, you will come to know that joy for which man was created.
Son. Dad, I’m grateful for this understanding.
Father. If you can stand one more idea, Paul, please consider this: The people who you will be called to serve on your mission or in the Church already exist. Your wife is somewhere, known or unknown to you now. The children you will have already exist, somewhere. I think the important things are to love and bless all of these people now. Don’t wait until you are called or married. If you can love them now, you will keep yourself clean and you will be striving to grow in love for the Savior, in spirituality, and in righteousness. Then when your callings come, you will be ready to bless, to love with a pure love. Would you turn to the fifteenth chapter of John and read verses 5 through 12?
Son.
“I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.
If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you.
Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.
As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love.
If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.
These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full.
This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.”
[photos] Photography by Eldon Linschoten
Chauncey C. Riddle, professor of philosophy and dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University, serves as a Sunday School teacher in the Orem 16th Ward, Orem Utah Sharon Stake.
Five sobering examples from the scriptures show what could block our prayers. For Saul, the obstacle was disobedience.
Chauncey C. Riddle, “Obstacles to Prayer,” Ensign, Jan 1976, 27
First and last, true religion is a personal relationship with our Savior, Jesus Christ. Prayer is the key to establishing that relationship. As one prays obediently, he learns to know and to treasure the things of the Spirit. The fruit of that relationship is righteousness, doing good for one’s fellowmen as the Holy Spirit guides one. The basic sequence of events in the conversion of an ordinary man into a righteous man is: (1) He hears the gospel and is touched by the Holy Spirit. (2) The Holy Spirit teaches him how to pray. (3) As he prays the Holy Spirit guides him in purifying his life through faith in Jesus Christ, repentance, baptism, and the laying on of hands for the receiving of the right to the constant companionship of the Holy Ghost. (4) Now being in the narrow way, he prays even more effectively under the influence of the Holy Spirit and endures to the end of becoming like the Savior: full of righteousness.
In the sequence listed above it is not just prayer that counts; it is effective prayer. Prayer is effective when one receives the guidance and gifts of the Spirit of the Lord. Some persons know how to pray but cannot; others know not how. The net effect is that they all are blocked from spiritual growth. But it is something about themselves that blocks that growth. The glad tidings of the gospel are the information we need to know to change ourselves to be able to pray effectively.
Though this world wallows in the misery of spiritual death, no individual needs to remain like the world. Because the fulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ has been restored, accompanied by divine priesthood authority and the true church of Jesus Christ, the way is open to every person to learn effective prayer and thus to come unto the Master and to do his works. The gospel is a formula for success. No person who accepts and lives it will fail to overcome the world and its misery.
In the scriptures we find record of persons who were not, at least for a time, successful. They were not, at those times, living the gospel and thus were cut off from the manifestations of the Spirit. Through repentance, each could have offered effective prayer and would then have received the help he needed. These examples are given to us in the scriptures that we may profit from their experience with obstacles to effective prayer. Hopefully we will not need to repeat those experiences. Let us examine the stories of King Saul, Laman and Lemuel, King Noah, Peter, and Saul of Tarsus.
1. Disobedience. In a time of great distress and trial for the house of Israel, the Lord chose Saul of the tribe of Benjamin to be their king. Anointed under the hand of Samuel, the prophet, Saul also received instruction from the Lord through Samuel. In his obedience he had great success. But then he grew great in his own sight and felt he no longer needed to obey.
During this time, the Lord instructed Saul to go to Amalek and utterly destroy it because of their persistent wickedness, slaying “man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.” (Please read 1 Sam. 15:1–5.) Saul’s obedience was only partial, was self-serving: he spared Agag, king of the Amalekites, and the best of the Amalekite sheep and oxen. When Samuel discovered this, Saul rationalized that the livestock were to be used for sacrifice for the Lord.
“And Samuel said, Hath the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.
“For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, he hath also rejected thee from being king. …
“And as Samuel turned about to go away, [Saul] laid hold upon the skirt of his mantle, and it rent.
“And Samuel said unto him, The Lord hath rent the kingdom of Israel from thee this day, and hath given it to a neighbour of thine, that is better than thou.” (1 Sam. 15:22–23, 27–28.)
The story of King Saul stands as a solemn warning to all of us. If the time ever comes that we think we can better serve God by following our own wisdom than we can by following the direction of the Lord through his Holy Spirit and through his holy prophets, we have apostatized. If we thus reject the Lord, we have broken the slender thread of communication. Our prayers cannot then be effective.
We might speculate as to what caused King Saul to disobey. Was it pride? Was it fear of the people? Was it carelessness or thoughtlessness? Whatever the cause the result was the same: Saul no longer feared God. The purpose of prayer is to gain the knowledge and strength to do the will of God. Disobedience makes of prayer a mockery in us, even as it did for Saul.
2. Hardness of heart. Laman and Lemuel were born to the same goodly parents that blessed Nephi with great knowledge of spiritual things. But whereas Nephi received those teachings in humility and faith, Laman and Lemuel rejected the words of their father as the imaginations of an unrealistic man. In his obedience, Nephi went on to receive great revelations and knowledge of his own. But in their hardness of heart, Laman and Lemuel were barely affected even by the visitation of an angel.
Again we are caused to wonder why these older brothers were so obstinate, spiritually speaking. Were they incapable of exercising faith? Or were they able only to respect things that were natural? Regardless of the cause of their problems, the moral for us is clear: If we are to be men and women of God we must prize and cultivate the tender feelings of our hearts. The first intimations of revelation from the Holy Spirit are feelings in our heart—feelings of good and bad, feelings of sympathy for suffering, feelings of longing for spiritual insight. To ignore or to quash these feelings is hardheartedness. Those who demand that everything be decided in terms of physical things are thus hardhearted. They cannot learn to pray and to be guided by the Holy Spirit because they reject it when it tries to get through to them.
Had Laman and Lemuel realized that it was not Lehi and Nephi that they were rejecting, but rather, that they were denying their own hearts, perhaps they could have repented. Perhaps they could then have experimented with those feelings to see if the gospel promises are true. They could have examined the scriptures, being led by their own hearts to understanding. But they did not. They rejected themselves as being intelligent enough to grasp spiritual things by denying their hearts the opportunity to feel.
He who learns to pray truly and effectively is never a person who is hardhearted. In all humility he turns inward, cultivates those feelings of his heart, that still, small voice. In these things, unseen to anyone but himself, he comes to true prayer, to spirituality, to pure love, to eternal life.
3. Selfishness. King Noah was the son of a good father who taught him correctly. But Noah sought only to enjoy the material things of life at the expense of others. Unlike his righteous father, King Noah did not labor to support himself, but taxed his people of one-fifth of their possessions to build many elegant buildings for himself and to support his many wives and concubines. Through his personal indulgence and selfish example, King Noah weakened his people both spiritually and temporally. This proved to be their downfall, even though they were warned of the consequences of their actions by the prophet Abinadi. (Please read Mosiah 12.)
Another name for selfishness is carnal security. People who overvalue the things of the physical order have to have more and more goods and pleasures to stay satisfied. This kind of appetite cannot be satisfied except through oppression: getting someone else to do the work to provide material abundance. It is a curious paradox that people who live for material pleasures generally detest work and try to find a slave to do it for them, whereas people who treasure the things of the spirit learn to love work and they work hard to produce material blessings for others.
The point of all this is that selfishness and glorying in carnal security cut one off from the Holy Spirit so that he cannot pray effectively. True prayer leads to righteousness; but righteousness is achieved only in sacrifice. The last thing the selfish person wants is sacrifice, so he naturally does not pray very successfully.
4. Weakness. The story of Peter, the great chief of the Master’s apostles, is instructive in that Peter’s wavering shows us an important pitfall to avoid. On the night of his betrayal, the Savior warned Peter of this weakness when he said Peter would thrice deny his knowledge of the Savior before sunrise. True to the prophecy, Peter did deny his relationship with Jesus, but immediately repented of his actions when he realized what he had done. (See Luke 22:31–34, 54–62.)
Before we condemn Peter for denying that he knew the Savior, let us remember two things: he did not yet have the constant companionship of the Holy Spirit, and when he did receive that great gift, he was never after in that predicament. But he did waver before he received that gift. He did not yet fully realize that all things work together for the good of those who love the Lord, and that therefore there is nothing to fear. He did not yet fully understand the love his Lord and Savior had for him. Later he, as Paul, fully understood:
“For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
“Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Rom. 8:38–39.)
Many of us, weak in the spirit, do waver. Weakness stifles the impulse to pray; worse, it works against our obedience when we have prayed. To serve the Lord well one must have confidence and daring. But the true confidence is born of the companionship of the Comforter. True daring is trust in the Lord, knowing that there is a narrow path to success through any difficulty if only we can love and serve him with all our hearts, mights, minds, and strength.
5. False traditions. Saul of Tarsus was zealous in his religion. But his religion, once of God, had been adulterated by the false traditions of men. Those false traditions kept him from listening to his own conscience until the Lord chastized him. (See Acts 9:3–6.)
The traditions of the Pharisees had led Saul far astray. False ideas from any apparent source, are the work of the father of lies, who would captivate us all in error and darkness. But into this dark world there comes a ray of glorious light, the Holy Spirit bearing witness of Jesus Christ and the Father and leading all who accept them into all truth. The traditions of men of the world are always fraught with debilitating error. But there is one truth that righteous men always pass on to others who will listen: men should put their trust in God, not in the arm of flesh. The traditions of men have one possible righteous purpose: to point each soul to a personal relationship with God. That personal relationship is achieved in true prayer.
The happy part of these five stories of failure from the scriptures is that two of them were preludes to success. Peter and Saul were not hardened and destroyed by their disastrous experiences. They were humble enough to learn the lessons involved, to turn to the Lord, to become mighty in his work. King Saul, Laman and Lemuel, and King Noah had that same opportunity at one time. If they had been genuinely sorry, they could have gone before the Lord in repentance and in mighty prayer to seek a newness of life in him.
You and I, perhaps also having had disastrous experiences, have the same choice. We can humble ourselves and learn to be like the Lord by yielding to the enticings of his Holy Spirit. Or we can continue in the ways of King Saul, Laman and Lemuel, or King Noah. The size of our kingdom matters not. The least of us can be disobedient like Saul, hardhearted like Laman and Lemuel, selfish like Noah, or we can repent and become mighty instruments for good as did Peter and Paul.
If we repent, it will be through mighty prayer. That grand opportunity is no less effective today than it was for Father Adam, for Noah, for John the Beloved, for Joseph Smith. If we would have our prayers be as effective as those of President Spencer W. Kimball, we must learn to pray as he and all the holy prophets do.
We have not been sent into the world to fail. We have been sent to fulfill the prophecies and to lay hold of every good thing, through faith and mighty prayer, for “the effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.” (James 5:16.)
[illustrations] Illustrated by Michael Clane Graves
Dr. Chauncey C. Riddle is a professor of philosophy and dean of the graduate school at Brigham Young University. He teaches Sunday School in the Orem 16th Ward, Orem Utah Sharon Stake.
Posted inEnsign, Prayer|Comments Off on Obstacles to Prayer
Persecution—the word probably makes you think of Rome and Liberty Jail, but what does it mean in the 20th century?
Dear Michael,
Thanks for your letter; it was good to hear that things are going well with you. You said you wonder about persecution. May I give you my thinking on that topic? First, some background.
I believe that the first and foremost thing for us to remember is that our beloved Master is in charge. In him we live and move and have our being. He has placed controls on the course of the heavens, the forces and events of nature, the course of nations, and the life of every human being. He grants each of us on this earth enough agency to show our true nature, but never enough to destroy his own purposes. Because men have agency, there is evil. But that evil always has bounds. Two passages from Paul delight my soul as they drive this point home:
“And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God.”
“For I am persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
“Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Rom. 8:28, 38–39.)
The acknowledgement that the Savior’s work is only to bless and that his hand is in all things is the foundation of faith. When this eternal perspective is surely planted in our souls by the ministrations of the Holy Spirit, we can have that hope, born of faith, which “maketh an anchor to the souls of men, which would make them sure and steadfast, always abounding in good works.” (Ether 12:4.) We all need that security. Persecution brings insecurity to those who are weak and ungrounded. But the faithful can look on persecution with equanimity, knowing that their security is spiritual. No persecution can rob them of anything essential.
That, of course, raises the question as to what is essential. I count as essential the opportunity to be obedient to my Savior, to have the covenants and the priesthood, to have my dear wife and our wonderful children in eternity. I count as nonessential my job, my reputation, my home, my farm, my friends, my health, my life. Now don’t mistake me. I enjoy and desire all of those things. But if I ever had to choose between my enjoyment of them in this world and partaking of the Savior’s love through the Spirit, I would not hesitate. The Lord has so blessed me and answered my prayers that I trust his promise of the blessings of the next world as being far greater than any temporary enjoyment of this world.
I can hear you say, “Brave words. What about deeds?” I know that it is what one does under stress that really counts. But I also know I can’t guarantee anything about the future. As I look at some of my friends who seem to have thrown in the towel and to have given themselves over to Satan, I can only say, “There, but for the grace of God, go I.” My hope is in that grace. God being willing, I will meet the tests. All I am sure of is that at this moment I have a burning desire to do all that the Savior would have me do. I hunger to bring souls unto him, that they may share my joy in the sweetness of the companionship of his Spirit and in the opportunity to bless others.
But on to persecution!
The word persecute itself means “to pursue.” Thus persecution is pursuit to do harm. Its opposite is to bless, to help. Its contrary is to live and let live. Though this subject does not readily yield itself to neat subdivision, some broad types are obvious. We could mention physical, social, and intellectual persecution.
Last Sunday I saw again the film And Should We Die. That brought vividly to mind the importance of being spiritually ready for physical persecution. Raphael Monroy and his companion Vicente Morales were ready to meet death for their testimony, senseless and fortuitous though the circumstances might have been. President Bentley was able to lead the people of the colony in their narrow escape through fasting and prayer. But while we all hope to escape, we know not all will. Raphael and Vicente had to join the Prophet Joseph, his brother Hyrum, Parley P. Pratt, the Savior, John the Baptist, Abinadi, Abel, and countless others in the death of deliberate persecution. In view of the burning and bombing and the hateful murders of our own time, it may be that some of us or some of the rising generation must face death for our Master. Whether we, as individuals, will face it or not is not the point. I think the point is, we must be ready.
Now if each of us had several days to decide whether or not to die for the Savior, most of us would do well. But is not the real test what we would do under immediate attack? I remember the words of Joseph F. Smith at a campfire in California when challenged by horsemen intent on killing Mormons. I hope I can always reply in his spirit when he was asked if he were a Mormon: “Yes, siree; dyed in the wool; true blue, through and through.” (Joseph F. Smith, Gospel Doctrine, Deseret Book Co., 1939 ed., p. 518.) Many of us might not mind dying gloriously, with much fanfare and publicity. But die for chastity when accosted on a freeway? Die for honesty in a prison camp? Die for belief in God at the hands of a mob? If our testimony means enough to us that we prepare each morning either to live for the Savior or to die for him that day, we will always be prepared.
But perhaps we will not be murdered; just robbed, looted, burned, driven. Kirtland, Independence, Far West, Nauvoo should always be in our minds. Those persecutions are our heritage; we must again be ready should they need to become our legacy. The Lectures on Faith make it clear where we must stand: “An actual knowledge to any person, that the course of life which he pursues is according to the will of God, is essentially necessary to enable him to have that confidence in God without which no person can obtain eternal life. It was this that enabled the ancient saints to endure all their afflictions and persecutions, and to take joyfully the spoiling of their goods, knowing (not believing merely) that they had a more enduring substance.
“Having the assurance that they were pursuing a course which was agreeable to the will of God, they were enabled to take, not only the spoiling of their goods, and the wasting of their substance, joyfully, but also to suffer death in its most horrid forms; knowing (not merely believing) that when this earthly house of their tabernacle was dissolved, they had a building of God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.” (Lectures on Faith, p. 57.)
Only that faith nurtured in the privacy of peace will weather turmoil of trial.
When I think of social persecution, two classic examples come to mind. One is the story of a Welsh family, beautifully told in the article entitled “Persecution, 1924” in the January 1975 Ensign. That remarkable father led his family ten miles to church over mountain and dale, through rain and mud when necessary. And when confrontation was the right thing to do, he had the courage to do it. Persecution for his family was the hammer and anvil by which they all acquired that temper which makes saints out of faint hearts and well-wishers.
The other example is connected with the controversy over the laws of the Utah Territory and federal law in the last century. I honor the memory of George Reynolds, who, loyal both to his people and to his government, stood trial and suffered imprisonment so that the laws could be clarified. This man, secretary to four First Presidencies, General Authority, legislator, businessman, and editor, willingly absorbed the attack of the enemies of the Church so that others might not need to suffer in that way. Then to cap it off, he used his time in prison to produce our concordance to the Book of Mormon. Perhaps you know the brief account of his life and sufferings found in the preface to that work. (A Complete Concordance to the Book of Mormon, Salt Lake City, 1900, pp. 3–4.)
Recent commendation of the Church and some of its members is a pleasant change for our peculiar people. The changed climate has helped us to bear testimony, to gain the ear of some who otherwise would not have heard. But while we rejoice in that change we must remember that it is not universal. Throughout the world there is yet ostracism, discrimination, defamation, and harassment. What a challenge both to be humble under praise and steady under persecution, not really knowing which will come next! Our path is to be constant, in season and out of season, bearing our witness as the Spirit directs, come what may. When I think of the “come what may,” I am comforted by the saying of Elder Boyd K. Packer: “The truth doesn’t make enemies; it uncovers them.” We are sent to perform a task that includes the uncovering of enemies along with the joy of finding the lost sheep of our Master. If we fear his enemies, we are not likely to find his sheep.
Bad as physical and social persecution can be, I think that intellectual persecution is the most devastating. The former are by nature opposition from outside, and as such they may actually serve to strengthen the Church. But the intellectual attack also works within the Church. It divides and dilutes us when it comes from members. Let me give you two examples of ideas for which we are persecuted at various times and places.
The first is personal revelation. To me, one of the great glories of the Restoration is the promise “that every man might speak in the name of God the Lord, even the Savior of the world.” (D&C 1:20.) Personal revelation makes every man a prophet, every woman a prophetess, to know the voice of the Lord and to bear witness of him, not needing to depend upon the arm of flesh. Oh, how personal revelation pulls down intellectual tyranny, priestcraft, and private interpretation of scripture! How it assuages the confused mind, the aching heart, the yearning soul! How it builds faith in our Lord, hope for eternity! How it clothes all with a mantle of charity, the pure love of Christ!
Forgive me; I know I don’t need to sing the praises of personal communication with the Savior to you. But I can’t help being excited when I ponder all the blessings that come to mankind by it. Perhaps its strength is the very reason why it becomes a focus for persecution.
I once heard a professor boast that he had broken more priests, rabbis, and Bible readers than anyone else in the business. With that boast he warned any who wished to continue to believe in revelation to depart. I stayed. Then he lowered the boom and went through all the reasons why belief in revelation was irrational. He showed how the people who claimed revelation were inconsistent, both within their own individual writings and among themselves. He pointed out the great abuses that religion had wrought in the world, from inquisitions to caste systems to human sacrifice. He mocked the Bible, pointing out what he took to be obvious internal contradictions. Then he went on to show how everything good in human progress had consisted in rejection of religious belief in favor of scientific, empirical evidence.
Well, frankly I was devastated by that onslaught. There I was, a graduate student, well schooled in Latter-day Saint theology, happily Mormon all my life, a defender of the faith and successful sufferer under physical and social persecution—but devastated. He had made me realize that I did not have a personal testimony of revelation. All I had was an intellectual awareness of what others said about our religion. That realization shook me, for I realized fully that I might have been wrong.
During the next few weeks I went through an experience for which I can think of only one word as a representation: hell. I was assailed by doubt, by fear, by loneliness; I began to wonder if I were sane. Through this time I kept two promises I had made: I continued to go to Church, and I continued to read ten pages in the scriptures each night; but those things became an agony to me. And I prayed. Oh, how I prayed to know for myself if there were such a thing as personal revelation.
Then—thanks to our good Master—it came. I began to feel something special in my breast. I began to recognize certain ideas that appeared in my mind as being different from my own thoughts. These new ideas told me how to interpret passages of scripture, how to understand things formerly incomprehensible to me, even to know the future. But I could tell the difference. Here was the iron rod. I had hold of it. The restored gospel was true!
Since then I have had stumblings. I have been burned, and through those negative experiences I have learned two things: first, without Him I am nothing, and second, I must be ever so careful not to be confused as to who it is that is speaking. Now a full quarter-century has passed. That slender thread of personal revelation has brought me to everything I now hold dear. It has brought a flood of knowledge and understanding—and a glimpse of how far yet to go. I now know that there is power in the priesthood and that the Lord Jesus Christ is indeed the leader of this Church. Now as I see it touching the lives of others, my heart overflows with gratitude to the Lord for this pearl of great price that each of us can have. My greatest sorrow, except for my own sins, is that some whom I know cannot seem to get it. But I have hope for them. Looking back I know that I must have had much personal revelation before that trial. The problem was that I had not become acute in recognizing it.
So personal revelation becomes a great watershed, in the Church and out. Those who have it are drawn into a unity of faith. Many of those who don’t have it think those who do are deluded or demented. I suspect some fear that it might really exist—so they persecute those who teach and proclaim its reality. They don’t want it for fear they might have to give up some sin. And they don’t want anyone else to have it, for that too convicts them of sin.
So we are persecuted for personal revelation in a world that prides itself on “hard” evidence, on objectivity, on the strength of consensus. As a philosopher of knowledge, I can only shake my head. For now I know and can prove that there is no such thing as evidence apart from a matrix of presuppositions, that objectivity is at best consensus, and that consensus is often but a public relations job. Every scientific system begins with unproved postulates. Every person founds his life on articles of faith. But what a blessing to be able to ground faith on a rock—on personal daily revelation from our Savior.
I promise to be more brief on the next idea. We are also persecuted for our belief in uniqueness, for the idea that there is but one true church, one true priesthood, one narrow path to salvation, one chosen people, one fountain for all righteousness. Many people of my acquaintance are willing to see good in the Church, especially as a social system. But to claim that no one except Mormons can become celestial raises hackles. It does not fit with this permissive, egalitarian, ecumenical age. It is taken to be a sign of snobbery, of racism, of hypocrisy, of almost anything bad. One of the reasons my soul so hungers and yearns to see the full establishment of Zion is that we won’t have to say anything about uniqueness then. We will just be content to be unique. How unique it would be if we could get at least half of the Church to be of one heart and one mind, to dwell in righteousness and have no poor among us. I think that we would then see the fulfillment of that promise and challenge: “That the kingdoms of this world may be constrained to acknowledge that the kingdom of Zion is in very deed the kingdom of our God and his Christ.” (D&C 105:32.)
Meanwhile, we are subject to persecution for our claim to be the true church and are dismissed with others who make the same claim. Is it possible that we deserve persecution on this point? If we claim to be the one and can’t show we are significantly better, perhaps we have earned trouble. Oh for Zion!
Two more observations on persecution.
The first concerns the story of Stephen in Acts 6 and 7. I reread it recently and was forcefully impressed with an idea. Stephen has always come across to me as a good and gentle man, well suited to minister to widows’ needs, “full of the Holy Ghost,” a powerful servant of Christ. But it has always struck me that he spoke to the Sanhedrin rather forthrightly, surely provocatively. His speech would hardly win any Dale Carnegie awards. I have wondered: Did he have a martyr complex? Was he deliberately trying to die?
My feeling now is that he enjoyed life as much as you or I and was doubtless very happy because of the good he was able to do for others. But he had a mission to perform. For some reason the Sanhedrin needed another witness of the great tragedy in which they were principals. The promised Messiah had come and had fulfilled all things while they, who desired to be his servants but would not recognize him, carefully engineered his death. Tragic flaw, damning fate, indeed. His own rejected him as would have done no other nation or people. Could Stephen have supposed that he could convert them when the Savior himself had failed?
But Stephen was true to his mission. He bore testimony of Christ and of their sin. The flood of hate and anger that carried him outside the walls to die, stone by stone, was the necessary consequence of his commission. He sealed his testimony (and probably their reward) with blood. The moral I draw from this story is that we should not be needlessly offensive in this world; we should never seek to be persecuted; we should seek to fill our personal missions, wending our way among the hate and persecutions that will come, but never trying to offend. But should our commission call us to an unsavory task, where we cannot help but offend, then we should bear the task off manfully, yet with great humility, with a firm grasp on the iron rod. I honor Stephen for his great example.
My second thought relates to Saul and Paul, also of Acts. Saul persecuted the Saints with great zeal and ability. Then the Lord’s mercy allowed him to repent to become Paul, and he was persecuted by the Jews and others even as he had persecuted. I think all of us should see ourselves in this story. We should ask ourselves: “Am I yet Saul, or am I now Paul?Am I still persecuting the saints and the Savior, or have I repented of my sins to serve and suffer for the Lord? Do I persecute others in my zeal to do God a favor (as if he needed my hate or scorn to further his cause), or do I humbly and patiently submit to all things that my God seeth fit to inflict upon me, even as a child doth submit to his father?”
My final point concerns again our personal relationship with the Savior. He who knows all things and has created all things has also taken upon himself the suffering required to atone for all sins. When we try to imagine all of the pain resulting from our own sins, our imagination staggers. When we try to imagine the suffering caused by the sins of every human being who has ever lived or will live on earth, it transcends our capacity for comprehension. Yet that is what the Savior took upon himself when he drank of the bitter cup to satisfy the demands of the Father’s justice. In his infinite love and concern for us, he bore the burden of our own sins for us, that we need not suffer and atone personally for our sins. The qualification is, of course, that we repent and become sinless as he is. As long as we go on sinning, there is no way we can be forgiven.
You and I, because we know the gospel is true and because we want to stop sinning, have covenanted with our Savior to obey him in all things. Our obedience brings us to righteousness: we are able to bless others. But suppose that knowing what we do, we choose not to obey his commandments. That would be deliberate sin. We who know better, who know how to do better and be better, would be hurting those around us deliberately, because we would be choosing not to do better. Knowing how to bless our loved ones, we would be persecuting them should we sin. Worse yet, because we have been forgiven of our past sins through the blood of Christ, we would also be persecuting him. Matthew 25 haunts my understanding: “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.” (Matt. 25:40.)
Now I admit that this is an unusual approach to the idea of persecution. Usually we think about others persecuting us. We need to think especially about the possibility of our own persecution of others, for it is the latter, not the former, that truly destroys us. This approach makes our choice simple: to sin or not to sin, which is to persecute or not to persecute. To choose not to persecute is to choose to repent, to live the gospel, to love others with that same pure love with which our Savior loves us. It is to choose to be willing to be persecuted, but to suffer death before we would persecute. Our Master has shown the way by his complete obedience to his Father and in giving up his own life. How grateful am I to know that he is the Way, the Truth, and the Life!
Michael, you have been kind to wade through all of this. I inflict this on you only in the hope that our souls will so hunger after Him whom we love that we will make every sacrifice necessary to become as he is. That is the greatest thing we can do about persecution. Remember the words of the Prophet Joseph Smith:
“Let us here observe, that a religion that does not require the sacrifice of all things never has power sufficient to produce the faith necessary unto life and salvation; for, from the first existence of man, the faith necessary unto the enjoyment of life and salvation never could be obtained without the sacrifice of all earthly things. It was through this sacrifice, and this only, that God has ordained that men should enjoy eternal life; and it is through the medium of the sacrifice of all earthly things that men do actually know that they are doing the things that are well pleasing in the sight of God. When a man has offered in sacrifice all that he has for the truth’s sake, not even withholding his life, and believing before God that he has been called to make this sacrifice because he seeks to do his will, he does know, most assuredly, that God does and will accept his sacrifice and offering, and that he has not, nor will not seek his face in vain. Under these circumstances, then, he can obtain the faith necessary for him to lay hold on eternal life.” (Lectures on Faith, p. 58.)
[photo] BYU Motion Picture Department
Dr. Chauncey C. Riddle is a professor of philosophy and dean of the graduate school at Brigham Young University. He teaches Sunday School in the Orem 16th Ward, Orem Utah Sharon Stake.
Commencement address given to the graduates of Brigham Young University, 15 August 1975. Chauncey C. Riddle is Assistant Academic Vice-President — Graduate Studies and Curriculum, at Brigham Young University.
Chauncey C. Riddle
BYU for Zion – Quoted from BYU Studies-Summer 1976-
President Tanner, brothers and sisters, friends of Brigham Young University: I wish first to extend special congratulations to all who graduate this day. I hope that you are educated in addition to being graduated. By educated I mean having the ability to think clearly, to make proper discriminations and judgments, to understand what you believe and remember. Education begins with memorization; but if that is also the end, true education has not been attained.
The story is told of the great physicist Michael Pupin that he once was engaged in lecturing about the country. His chauffeur would drive him to a location and listen to the lecture. At the last stand, he said to Pupin, “Dr. Pupin, I have heard your lecture at least fifteen times, and I believe I could give it myself. No one here is likely to know you personally, so why don’t you be the chauffeur and I’ll give the lecture?”
Being a bit of an adventurer himself, Pupin went along with the idea. The chauffeur turned out to be a good showman. He delivered the lecture word perfect, and with a flair. At the conclusion he said, “We have just enough time left for one question. Is there one?”
After a moment, a man arose and asked a rather pointed question about the lecture. The pretender was a showman yet. He thanked the questioner, then said, “The question is sufficiently elementary that I will call upon my chauffeur to answer it for you.” I guess the moral of the story is that if you are not educated, be sure you have a chauffeur who is.
Something very special about you who are graduating today is that you are centennial graduates, products of the one-hundredth year of this institution. The Centennial celebration is a great time to look back, to gain appreciation of the sacrifice, sweat, and tears which have enabled BYU to come to its hundredth year. It is also a time to look forward. With good reason, we can expect that the second century will be greater than the first.
The reason for the difference is the progress of the Church, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. The stone which was cut out of the mountain without hands is rolling forth to fill the whole earth. What a thrill it is to see the Church moving in majesty and power, yet with grace, as it fulfills the prophecies! The Church is preparing the world for the Second Coming of our Lord and Savior.
As I understand the scriptures, two great works crown that preparation. The first is missionary work. The gospel must go forth to every nation, kindred, tongue, and people with joyful greeting to invite every soul to the supper of the Lamb. I hope that each of us is supporting President Kimball in our prayers, asking that the doors of the nations will be opened and that we shall be ready when they do open. I hope that each of us is doing all he can to field the hundred thousand missionaries. Then we can lift our sights to the one hundred forty and four thousand high priests who will sweep the earth with righteousness, as with a flood.
Glorious and great as the missionary work is, there is another preparation for the Savior which is equally necessary. It is the establishment of Zion again on the earth, on this continent. How fortunate you and I are to be living in the days of its establishment! Many righteous men, prophets of old, longed to see Zion. Though they personally were worthy of being part of Zion, their contemporaries would not be persuaded to it. Our friend, the prophet Isaiah, saw it clearly in vision and rejoiced:
1 Awake, awake; put on thy strength, O Zion; put on thy beautiful garments, O Jerusalem, the holy city: for henceforth there shall no more come into thee the uncircumcised and the unclean.
2 Shake thyself from the dust; arise, [and] sit down, O Jerusalem: loose thyself from the bands of thy neck, O captive daughter of Zion.
7 How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace; that bringeth good tidings of good, that publisheth salvation; that saith unto Zion, Thy God reigneth!
8 Thy watchmen shall lift up the voice; with the voice together shall they sing: for they shall see eye to eye, when the LORD shall bring again Zion.
9 Break forth into joy, sing together, ye waste places of Jerusalem: for the LORD hath comforted his people, he hath redeemed Jerusalem.
For Zion is a people who are pure in heart. They have not only entered in at the strait gate but have pursued the narrow way to its end. Through their faith in Christ, they overcome all things, beginning with each individual self. The Lord crowns their faithful obedience to him by purifying them. They then have one heart and one mind. They dwell in righteousness, and there is no poor among them. Because they have made his path strait, the Lord himself comes to dwell with them.
“Blessed are all the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” (3 Nephi 12:8)
Zion is the pavilion of the Lord. It is his dwelling place. But he cannot come to it in the days of wrath and disobedience, except to burn. In his mercy he waits until the stakes are strong and the pavilion is fully erected and ready, worthy of its king. The great opportunity you and I have is to support the authorities of the Church, to carry out the programs, to magnify our callings so that the work of the holy priesthood will be complete. Then the earth will not be utterly wasted at his coming.
As I hope you can see, I rejoice with Isaiah and with you at the prospect of Zion’s again being established upon the earth. But that is background. My message today is really about Brigham Young University. The question I ponder is, What kind of an institution must BYU be to be fully acceptable to the Lord as part of Zion? Now I do not suppose that Zion needs BYU; it could be established without this institution. But BYU is part of the Church Education System. If it does not grow and increase in glory as the Church will, that would be a calamity. But a great and glorious BYU could well be a great contributor to the beauty of Zion.
What would this university need to be, to be part of Zion? I do not pretend to see the whole picture, but I believe I see some of it. May I share with you six factors which I personally believe should help qualify this university to be part of Zion. Each of them is noteworthy in at least two respects. Each factor is a reflection of what I understand every individual must do personally to qualify to be part of Zion, and each would make this institution quite unlike the model universities which the would esteems. I present these six points not that you should believe me, but that you might compare them with your own image of the BYU of the future.
NUMBER ONE: DEPENDENCE UPON THE SAVIOR
I understand the law of the celestial kingdom to be faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Without faith it is impossible to please God, for whatsoever is not of faith is sin. Truly this is a counsel of perfection. We are commanded to become perfect, even as Christ is. He is perfectly obedient to his Father, and through his grace we may become perfectly obedient to him, if we so desire. I understand that the real importance of the fact that we have free agency is that we are free to become like our Lord and Master, with the full weight of his omnipotence and omniscience as the guarantee of that freedom. If we choose to be fully obedient to him, he will make it possible.
Faith in Christ is to hear the word of Christ, to believe, and to obey that word. Nephi of old counseled his people who had accepted the gospel as follows:
17 Wherefore, do the things which I have told you I have seen that your Lord and your Redeemer should do; for, for this cause have they been shown unto me, that ye might know the gate by which ye should enter. For the gate by which ye should enter is repentance and baptism by water; and then cometh a remission of your sins by fire and by the Holy Ghost.
18 And then are ye in this strait and narrow path which leads to eternal life; yea, ye have entered in by the gate; ye have done according to the commandments of the Father and the Son; and ye have received the Holy Ghost, which witnesses of the Father and the Son, unto the fulfilling of the promise which he hath made, that if ye entered in by the way ye should receive.
19 And now, my beloved brethren, after ye have gotten into this strait and narrow path, I would ask if all is done? Behold, I say unto you, Nay; for ye have not come thus far save it were by the word of Christ with unshaken faith in him, relying wholly upon the merits of him who is mighty to save.
20 Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life.
Moroni tells us in similar language how home teaching was done in those ancient days:
3 And none were received unto baptism save they took upon them the name of Christ, having a determination to serve him to the end.
4 And after they had been received unto baptism, and were wrought upon and cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost, they were numbered among the people of the church of Christ; and their names were taken, that they might be remembered and nourished by the good word of God, to keep them in the right way, to keep them continually watchful unto prayer, relying alone upon the merits of Christ, who was the author and the finisher of their faith.
In our own time the Savior has said it thusly:
43 And I now give unto you a commandment to beware concerning yourselves, to give diligent heed to the words of eternal life.
44 For you shall live by every word that proceedeth forth from the mouth of God.
45 For the word of the Lord is truth, and whatsoever is truth is light, and whatsoever is light is Spirit, even the Spirit of Jesus Christ.
46 And the Spirit giveth light to every man that cometh into the world; and the Spirit enlighteneth every man through the world, that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit.
47 And every one that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit cometh unto God, even the Father.
As applied to Zion in the latter days, the Savior makes the same point in the following words:
14 That through my providence, notwithstanding the tribulation which shall descend upon you, that the church may stand independent above all other creatures beneath the celestial world;
Faith in Christ enables us to become independent of the world because we labor solely under him and depend upon his merits.
As applied to BYU, this dependence would mean that the word of the Lord would be the most treasured possession we would have. Faith would find guidelines, and errors would be detected by revelations. The words of the living prophets would be esteemed above the words of any other living men.
NUMBER TWO: MORALITY, THE KEY TO KNOWLEDGE
Morality is another term for faithfulness. To be moral in the restored gospel is to obey the Savior in all things. Why obey him in all things? Because he is a God of righteousness. He does not command whim, but only that which is righteous according to a standard that is above him. I understand that righteousness is to bless others. Only in Christ do men know how to bless others sufficiently to meet the needs of mankind, for the Savior is the sole fountain of righteousness. Those who hunger and thirst after righteousness are his sheep. They hearken to his voice and come unto him that he might fill them with the Holy Ghost.
Those who obey his commandments are thus moral. Being moral, they can then be trusted with great knowledge, for they will not abuse it. They will use it only to further the cause of righteousness in the earth. The Savior makes this promise:
5 For thus saith the Lord–I, the Lord, am merciful and gracious unto those who fear me, and delight to honor those who serve me in righteousness and in truth unto the end.
6 Great shall be their reward and eternal shall be their glory.
7 And to them will I reveal all mysteries, yea, all the hidden mysteries of my kingdom from days of old, and for ages to come will I make known unto them the good pleasure of my will concerning all things pertaining to my kingdom.
8 Yea, even the wonders of eternity shall they know, and things to come will I show them, even the things of many generations.
9 And their wisdom shall be great, and their understanding reach to heaven; and before them the wisdom of the wise shall perish, and the understanding of the prudent shall come to naught.
10 For by my Spirit will I enlighten them, and by my power will I make known unto them the secrets of my will–yea, even those things which eye has not see, nor ear heard, nor yet entered into the heart of man. (D&C 76:5-10)
Does this mean that faculty and students at BYU will cease to read books and journals? Will all scientific investigation cease? Will all creation become a waiting for God to reveal? Not at all. All efforts to learn will increase, but they will then all be fruitful. For reading shall be done with discernment, and the reading of error will often be an occasion for a revelation of truth. Experiments will be conceived in revelation to capture insights of truth which will flash in to well-disciplined, cultivated, and informed minds. Artistic creation will spring forth from the bosom that hungers to edify and will find physical embodiment through persons skillful in all useful endeavors. The glory of man will not then be the pretense to create or discover. The glory will be given to the Father of lights as men humbly seek to embody his will in material things of this earth, even as it is done in heaven. Morality will be the key to knowledge, to creation, to every success.
The world would say that this process should be reversed. It is said by them that it is knowledge which leads to morality. There is a strong and irrational tradition in the world that the learned man is more likely to be moral than the unlearned. It is true that we must first know the will of the Lord before we can be faithful to him. But the world says that worldly knowledge is that which creates faith. I call holding that idea irrational because it does not stand up when put to the test of experience. The Savior has shown how he feels about the idea by choosing fishermen and farm boys to be his prophets. Not that the learning of the world is bad of itself. It is just that as it is usually acquired, it tends to block faith in Christ, which is morality. Jacob carefully noted that in that familiar passage which rankles those who would like to make worldly knowledge the basis for being a good person. he says:
42 And whoso knocketh, to him will he open; and the wise, and the learned, and they that are rich, who are puffed up because of their learning, and their wisdom, and their riches–yea, they are they whom he despiseth; and save they shall cast these things away, and consider themselves fools before God, and come down in the depths of humility, he will not open unto them.
43 But the things of the wise and the prudent shall be hid from them forever–yea, that happiness which is prepared for the saints. (2 Nephi 9:42-43)
I surmise that when all who are part of BYU become strong in obeying as well as in receiving the word of Christ, knowledge of all things in heaven and earth will flow unto them freely. Then indeed BYU will be the most proficient educational institution on the earth.
May I comment on what many persons see as an annoying provinciality of BYU: the dress and grooming standard. I see that standard as an invitation on the part of the living prophets to the children of light to please the Savior, that he might shower light and truth upon their heads. But if we do not search out the source–if we “hem and haw” over skirt and hair lengths–how can we be taught and trusted with the riches of eternity? Those who have the wit to make compliance with the standards-of-grooming part of faith in Christ, and who add to that small beginning of morality honesty, diligence, chastity, responsibility,–they are they who reap wisdom and great treasures of knowledge, even hidden treasures.
NUMBER THREE: CONCERN FOR THE POOR
The crown of morality is charity, the pure love of Christ. Those who love Christ reflect his love to others who are less fortunate than they. Whereas people of the world concern themselves with those who have more wealth, talent, prestige, or athletic ability, true servants of Christ care about those who have less. When the covenant servants of the Lord do not care for the poor, the Lord punishes and chastises them as when he allowed the members of the Church to be driven out of Jackson County, Missouri, in 1833. One of the glories of Zion is that therein love has triumphed over natural differences. All who are Zion become equal in earthly things and then become one in the Savior because of their love for him.
We are told in the Doctrine of Covenants:
14 I, the Lord, stretched out the heavens, and built the earth, my very handiwork; and all things therein are mine.
15 And it is my purpose to provide for my saints, for all things are mine.
16 But it must needs be done in mine own way; and behold this is the way that I, the Lord, have decreed to provide for my saints, that the poor shall be exalted, in that the rich are made low.
17 For the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare; yea, I prepared all things, and have given unto the children of men to agents unto themselves.
18 Therefore, if any man shall take of the abundance which I have made, and impart not his portion, according to the law of my gospel, unto the poor and the needy, he shall, with the wicked, lift up his eyes in hell, being in torment. (D&C 104:14-18)
Hell is one of the names which can appropriately be applied to this natural world. It is a kingdom ruled over and tormented by Satan, where lies, immorality, and unfaithfulness abound. But this world can be improved upon if we will employ the Lord’s way. If we love, if we obey the Lord, and if we share, we need not lift our eyes in hell, either now or after death; a celestial kingdom can be established right in the midst of hell, a kingdom called Zion.
How will BYU care for the poor? Its primary mission is not to the physically or the spiritually or the emotionally poor. Its direct mission is to those who are poor in knowledge and ability. To make them rich answers the ends of its creation. To be clear about how this might be done, let us analyze the nature of a true helping relationship, which charity, or caring, must be.
Real help must have its source in superiority. This is not necessarily total superiority, but the one who helps must have more knowledge, more skill, more power, or more resource–more of something than the one helped. For the lesser to help the greater is not help but servitude. Then, the person who has the superiority must place himself in a position of inferiority; he must become the servant of the one being helped. This means that neither the agency nor the integrity of the person being helped is breached. With the graciousness of true nobility, the helper extends succor which is freely and gratefully received. Help given against the will of the receiver is not real help; it is domination. The test of true help is this; does it leave the person helped better able to meet his problems, other things being equal?
For BYU to help those who are poor in knowledge and ability, the faculty here must have a towering superiority in those things, which it can and will have through dependence upon the Savior and hardworking, diligent obedience to him. Then those who teach must become the servants of those whom they would instruct. They must not teach by domination, but rather in the pattern set by the Savior for righteous dominion:
41 No power or influence can or ought to be maintained by virtue of the priesthood, only by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned;
42 By kindness, and pure knowledge, which shall greatly enlarge the soul without hypocrisy, and without guile. (D&C 121:41-42)
Not all the prerogatives of priesthood authority are appropriate to teaching, but the ones here mentioned certainly are.
Will a teacher who seeks to be a servant of both Christ and his students disdain to prepare? Will he be unconcerned about the personal problems of his students which keep them from learning? Will he cover up when an error or a lacuna in his material is pointed out? Will he grade on the curve as if his students were so many random manikins? Will he resist instruction from his superiors as to how he might better serve? No, he will rejoice in the opportunity he has to make his friends, his students, rich like unto himself in knowledge and ability.
What of students in this system? Will they not feel the gift of love and light and seek to absorb all the knowledge and attain all the ability they can? Will they not seek learning outside class requirements as well as in? Will they not share with fellow students, helping those who are poorer than themselves in ability to learn in order that their classmates might take full advantage of the instruction given? Yes, they will do all these good things and more, for they, too, love the Master.
NUMBER FOUR: EMPHASIS ON DOING
One of the lamentable debilities the world has suffered from for millennia is the supposition that knowing is more important than doing, understanding than performance. Knowing is taken to be an end in itself.
This mistake is reflected theologically in the notion of the world that the end of all is to behold the face of God, the “beatific vision.” I understand that the reason for that goal, grand as it is, is for a further end. To be the kind of person who could have that blessing, then to have it would make a man a great blessing to his fellow beings. This is to say that such a one would then turn to the poor to lift them up, be they poor in any of the ways one can be poor. This difference between knowing is also reflected in the change, which I understand was requested by President Kimball, in the song I Am a Child of God, Instead of singing, “Teach me all that I must know,” we sing, “Teach me all that I must do to live with him some day.” For surely it is not knowing what to do, but doing what we know we should do which enables us to be saved.
Part of the problem is that the tendency of a natural man in this world is to shun work. Much of history has been a game to see who could enslave whom. More people have lived as slaves in this world than have lived free, and there are more slaves today than there ever have been before. In such a setting, occupations that do not dirty the hands or cause the brow to sweat have been sought and esteemed. The Chaldeans, astrologers, and soothsayers have always been court attendants, next to the king or the president himself. In religion, orthodoxy has often been deemed more important than repentance. In a world where true knowledge and true wisdom are usually in short supply, those professing knowledge and wisdom are accorded the high honors.
But, thanks be to God, knowledge and wisdom are not in short supply in the kingdom of Christ: there is no such problem. Often the problem is that some of us know more than we wish to know. But that brings us to our problem, which is to be doers of the word. The Savior furnishes his kingdom with prophets, seers, revelators, scriptures, presidents, home teachers, fathers, mothers–and enables all of us to be accompanied by the Holy Ghost. Faith does not exist in the mere hearing of the word; it lives only in the doing. The Savior reminds us of this as follows:
5 But behold, verily I say unto you that there are many who have been ordained among you, whom I have called but few of them are chosen.
6 They who are not chosen have sinned a very grievous sin, in that they are walking in darkness at noonday. (D&C 95:5-6)
How would BYU differ from the world if it emphasized doing rather than knowing? Could not writing and speaking be more emphasized relative to reading? Internships an laboratory work would be more important than classroom lecture. Grading would be based more on performance than on memory. The whole of the educational practice would veer towards the application of knowledge. Graduation would be based on skill rather than on grade-point and seat-time. One of the reasons we enjoy sports so much is that we can tell who the doers are. What would it do to the university if at least once a week every professor had to compare his students with those of other universities? Men who decry competition do so out of fear; they know that they cannot compete in the real world. Only when tenured in an ivory tower before helpless students dare they puff up like men. But an emphasis on doing tends to change all that. And the doers turn out to be the real knowers.
What will people at BYU be doing? They will be reaching out to solve the problems of the world’s intellectual poverty. Our educational transmission systems are woefully inadequate; they must be rather completely redesigned. Our teaching of scientific research puts on blinders as well as helping. Our society downgrades technical skill, for which folly we are paying dearly. Millions over the earth who now have little hope for education could receive basic instruction at low cost. Spiritually guided pure research could provide the basis for elimination our energy crisis. The list extends to every intellectual and educational problem in the world. It is like genealogy. There is no danger of any one person’s doing all the work.
NUMBER FIVE: CAREFUL DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING INTELLIGENT AND BEING INTELLECTUAL
As we do the works of righteousness, the Lord can bless us more abundantly. He can shower upon our heads that intelligence which will enable us to become a great blessing to our fellow beings. But we must not be confused as to what this intelligence is, and we must distinguish is from its companion– intellectuality.
Intelligence is light and truth. Truth is knowledge of things as they are, as they were, and as they are to come. A study of human ability to know shows us that human beings as natural men–that is to say without divine revelation — are somewhat equipped to know physical things around them as they are; they are poorly equipped to know many things around them, such as other people; and they are very poorly equipped to know things distant. They are scarcely able to grasp the truth of things as they were. And they can only make guesses as to the truth of things to come. Small wonder that truth is a stranger in a world of fallen men whose god is the father of lies.
Light, the other part of intelligence, is wisdom. It is guidance, direction. It is knowing what to do to solve our problems. The natural man is at least as poorly equipped to be wise as he is to know the truth. In fact it is so bad that no human being or collection of human beings, acting on their own as natural men, can be sure that anything they propose to do is the best thing to do. And this applies to any discriminative standard of “best.” All human wisdom is thus a guess. No wonder the Savior inveighs against priestcraft. He just does not like one man’s guessing what is good for another, then taking praise and gain for it.
But the Savior does not leave it there. He gives us an alternative. He himself is the Spirit of truth. He himself is the Light of the world. His mission is to bring light and truth to mankind. To everyone he gives a little. But only those who receive the light and do what is right receive more light. To him who is faithful, the Lord can and does give light and truth, increasing him line upon line, precept upon precept, until that person either has all he wants or has received all the Lord has. Those persons who love the works of righteousness and who have found the Savior are magnified through and in light and truth until they become like the Savior himself. They are then indeed intelligent beings. To be intelligent is to receive and understand the things of God.
To be intellectual, on the other hand, is to receive and to understand the things of man. An intellectual is a person who had mastered a goodly portion of the language and learning of men. Every intellectual person has great command of and can use precisely at least one language. This linguistic skill makes it possible for him to think more clearly and more powerfully than those less learned. Language is a tool, and the intellectual person must also know some subject matter well, to have applied the tool of language with considerable force and precision in some area of learning. Learning can take many forms, but the usual minimum mastery of a subject is to know what the principal accepted ideas in the field are, what the principal problems, of the field are, and who the principal contributors to the field are. An additional echelon of eminence is attained if one himself is a contributor to the solution of problems in the field. To signify knowledgeability in a field is what is intended by the bestowal of the bachelor’s and master’s degrees. To signify a contribution to the solution of problems in the field is what is intended in the granting of a doctoral degree. Unfortunately, time and practice have blurred these distinctions and sometimes degraded them, but they originally were intended as meaningful ways of identifying a genuine intellectual.
I do not suppose that these two categories–the intelligent person and the intellectual person–can be fully mutually exclusive. I suppose that to understand the things of God one must have some language skill, be a good thinker, and acquire great understanding. I suppose that there is no person of great intellect whose mind is not quickened to some degree by the divine light and truth that emanate from the Savior. I judge that the learning of the world has a good deal of truth in it, and that when the Lord reveals a subject to the mind of a man, that revelation might include some truths already known to intellectual people. One problem lies in the fact that the learning of men, besides having a good deal of truth, is also shot through with error. Another problem lies in the fact that the tools of intellect are very clumsy in separating truth from error in the minds of intellectuals. Witness how difficult a time even simple truths like the heliocentricity of the solar system have had in gaining widespread acceptance.
A prime example of a person of great intellect but little intelligence was Saul of Tarsus. A man well schooled in the learning of the Jews, a Pharisee of the strictest sect, Saul was nevertheless a zealous destroyer of the work of the Savior, the more devastating because of his intellectual prowess. What little intelligence that had come to him Saul had vigorously resisted, as the Lord reminded him in saying, “It is hard for thee to kick against the pricks” (Acts 9:5). But Saul was finally willing to receive intelligence. He submitted himself to Ananias, who was the Savior’s appointed keeper in Damascus. He received the ordinances of salvation and accepted the light and truth that had burst upon him. As a new person, Paul diligently sought the Lord that he might remedy the gap in his education. Being called to the ministry, he bore a witness ground in both intelligence and intellect that made him a powerful servant of the Lord, and apostle whose testimony and teaching have blessed every generation of the world since his calling.
A contrary example, one of a man of great intelligence but little intellectual attainment is the case of the boy prophet Joseph Smith, Junior. Blessed by the Savior to receive more light and truth than any of his contemporary human beings, he became a giant in intelligence, so far surpassing even those who accepted the restored gospel that he could not share much of what he knew. Because of his faithfulness, revelation continued to pour out upon him throughout the short span of his life. But lo, what did this man of superlative intelligence do? He, too, felt a gap in his education. With great diligence and persistence the prophet of the Most High sought to become an intellectual. He studied languages, law, and apparently every subject to which he could find access. And was he a greater and better prophet for his intellectual attainments? No more correct, no more moral, but surely more effective in communicating the God-given intelligence which crowned his soul. And communication is a large part of what being a prophet is all about.
Now I would guess that you can think of examples of people who tend to be intellectual without intelligence or intelligent without intellect. I dare say you will be able to think of more who are in the former category. One of the casualties of every dispensation is the person who tries to let intellect do for intelligence. Such learned ones suppose they can judge both the truth and the morality of the word of the Lord and of his prophets. Jacob, the brother of Nephi, concisely expressed their plight:
When they are learned they think they are wise, and they hearken not to the counsel of God, for they set it aside, supposing they know of themselves, wherefore, their wisdom is foolishness and it profiteth them not. (2 Nephi 9:29)
Though there be many, in and out of the Church, who are intellectual with little intelligence, you probably will have difficulty thinking of many who are intelligent but with little intellect. This is so because a man on whom the Spirit of the Lord rests to quicken him with intelligence must be faithful to the light he receives, or it will withdraw from him. One of the things pertinent to the faithfulness of every servant of God is that he must learn to do well in the temporal matters in his stewardship. He must learn to understand, to control, to succeed. The Lord may instruct him in these things spiritually, or, if he has not sufficient faith, the Lord may send him to the world to learn to do well. The Lord says:
And as all have not faith, seek ye diligently and teach one another words of wisdom; yea, seek ye out of the best books words of wisdom; seek learning, even by study and also by faith. (D&C 88:118)
In a BYU for Zion, people will gain knowledge and skill both by study and by faith and will not confuse the two.
NUMBER SIX: NO PRIESTCRAFT
At a BYU for Zion, instruction would be difference from that of other universities in that it will have been cleansed of the lies, the false notions of the world which are riveted upon the hearts of the children by their fathers, these being the chains of hell. It will also be different in that it will be strictly informational: it will limit itself to truth. It will not pretend to be a source of light, which is to say wisdom, to the world.
Now I am sure you are aware that being a source of supposed wisdom is what universities are traditionally all about. Aristotle’s prescription for the ideal society was for men to find the path of wisdom, which leads to happiness, by reason. Persons not educated enough to reason were to go to a wise man, a philosopher, to have him reason out the path of wisdom for them. Universities were established originally as theological training schools, to teach the philosophies of men, appropriately mingled with scripture, so that society would amply furnished with wise men who could lead the people correctly. The “general education” which each university graduate receives is the residue of the wisdom training of the medieval priest. Though you are graduating in the robes of the medieval priest and are receiving similar recognition, hopefully you and I will avoid pretending that we are now, because of our degrees, adequate sources of wisdom to anybody. The scriptural term for lack of such avoidance is priestcraft.
To engage in priestcraft is to make a business out of being a wise man. It is to take reward for giving advice to others. Nephi says it this way:
29 He commandeth that there shall be no priestcrafts; for, behold priestcrafts are that men preach and set themselves up for a light unto the world, that they may get gain and praise of the world; but they seek not the welfare of Zion. (2 Nephi 26:29)
Indeed, one of the special reasons the Lord gave for restoring the gospel was to do away with priestcrafts. He says in the first section of the Doctrine and Covenants:
17 Wherefore, I the Lord, knowing the calamity which should come upon the inhabitants of the earth, called upon my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., and spake unto him from heaven, and gave him commandments;
18 And also gave commandments to others, that they should proclaim these things unto the world; and all this that it might be fulfilled, which was written by the prophets–
19 The weak things of the world shall come forth and bread down the mighty and strong ones, that man would not counsel his fellow man, neither trust in the arm of flesh–
20 But that every man might speak in the name of God the Lord, even the Savior of the world;
21 That faith also might increase in the earth. (D&C 1:17-21)
Let us be plain: The Lord Jesus Christ is the true Light of this world. No man knows enough to tell any other man what to do, how to be wise, except he receives that light from Christ. The Savior reveals light and truth only through the channels of his true priesthood, and to individuals. For any man to preside as a source of light, that man must hold priesthood authority. To have a testimony of the Church is to recognize the true authority of Christ in this Church. But there are also signs that follow. True servants of Christ giving true light have these marks: They do not attempt to force their light upon anyone, and they do not take pay for administering it.
Money always clouds the helping relationship. We are free to go to the Lord to receive wisdom, and he gives liberally and upbraids not. Freely we receive, and freely we should give. Is it not monstrous that a man should receive something freely from God, then turn and sell it to his fellowman? And is it not even more monstrous to substitute the wisdom of men for the wisdom of God and then to sell that paltry substitute?
BYU cannot save the world and will admit it. That will indeed make it different. BYU will be a haven of truth, a citadel of virtue, but it will eschew priestcraft. Its professors will give information and will teach technique but will not usurp the prerogative of the true priesthood to give personal advice.
In conclusion, let me extend two caveats. First, I am not supposing in my description of a BYU for Zion that BYU is presently doing none of these things. I deem that it is firmly on the path to such greatness at present. My purpose has been to celebrate what I take to be the goal of this institution. Second, perhaps what I have said may seem idealistic, even unrealistic. May I point out that part of the present reality of anything is what it can become. Not to see the potential in something is to miss the import of its reality as surely as does idle daydreaming. With man, many things I have said about BYU are not possible. But in Christ all good things are possible. Thank you.