Prayer

THE ENSIGN, MARCH 1975

BY CHAUNCEY C. RIDDLE

Praying is more than “saying prayers.” True prayer is an experience that takes place under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

One fundamental distinction between the saint and what the scriptures call the “natural man” is in their use of prayer. The natural man may say prayers, but it is not a spiritual experience for him. He is only reacting to his physical environment as he has been instructed or as he finds prudent. Praying, as distinct from merely saying prayers, has a spiritual dimension. The transformation from a natural man to a saint is marked by the ability to recognize and to respond to spiritual environment.

The person who is learning to be a saint must learn about the nature of God and man and the world, about the gospel and the Church of Jesus Christ. He must learn to control himself in faith, repentance, fasting, and mighty prayer, and in using the Holy Spirit as his guide. Finally, he must successfully use the understanding he has to bring to pass much righteousness. He then has something of infinite worth: the ability to do good in this world. As an intelligent man could not expect to step into a modern jet aircraft and fly it successfully without much learning and training, so such a man would not think that he could pray successfully without even greater preparation for that more difficult task.

What is the Purpose of Prayer?

We live in a universe of order. Law governs and controls all things, both physical, and spiritual. This is another way of saying that there is a regularity of causes and effects apparent everywhere. One application of this principle is that all things act (effects) in relation to their environment (causes). Some things are acted upon; they simply react in a regular way to what is happening in the environment. Water solidifies when the surroundings are cold, boils away when they are hot, and flows freely when the surroundings are at a medium temperature.

Some people suppose that man is like water, only responding to his natural environment. They observe that men buy what is advertised, shun that which is disgraced, cleave unto that which is pleasurable. These people predict successfully what most men will do by assessing their physical environment. They can do this because the natural man is not free. He is acted upon like water. Since most men are natural, the accuracy of such predictions runs high.

But, thanks to God, no natural man need remain natural. Though he must respond to his environment under the law of cause and effect, all men who have heard the gospel of Jesus Christ preached with the power of the Holy Ghost have a choice of environments. Having heard, they then can choose between reacting to their physical environment, as does the natural man, or they can react to the spiritual environment of which the gospel makes them aware. As long as the Holy Spirit labors with them, they can choose to respond to either one. This is the agency, the freedom of man: to choose to be natural, governed by the physical environment and their own flesh, or to be spiritual, governed by their own spirit as it yields to the Holy Spirit.

“Wherefore, men are free according to the flesh; and all things are given them which are expedient unto man.  And they are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil; for he seeketh that all men might be miserable like unto himself.

“And now, my sons, I would that ye should look to the great Mediator, and hearken unto his great commandments; and be faithful unto his words, and choose eternal life, according to the will of his Holy Spirit;

“And not choose eternal death, according to the will of the flesh and the evil which is therein, which giveth the spirit of the devil power to captivate, to bring you down to hell, that he may reign over you in his own kingdom.” (2 Nephi 2:27-29.)

Prayer is turning to the spiritual. It is seeking the will and the power of God through the Holy Spirit in order to yield to the spiritual order of reality. It is the key to the companionship of the Holy Spirit. Having that companionship, one need not lapse into the control of the lusts of the flesh and the pressures of the world. It is choosing to be part of the pressures of the world. It is choosing to be part of the realm where God reigns, where his will is done. It is a rejection of the opinions and wisdom of men who know not God. It is the beginning of salvation. Oh how great the goodness of our God, who prepares a way for us to escape from the deadly and desultory causes of the natural, fallen world!

Prayer is communion with the Almighty. He who finds himself aghast at the evil order of this world will likely seek something better. As he prays he discovers that the power of God reaches down into this fallen realm with a sweet, peaceful, assuring, and comforting influence that gives witness of truth, hope for a better world, and power to withstand evil. Without the opportunity to pray and to receive those precious gifts from the Holy Spirit, man would not be free. He would indeed be the trapped, damned animal he is thought to be by those who do not know God.

“And now, my beloved brethren, I perceive that ye ponder still in your hearts; and it grieveth me that I must speak concerning this thing.  For if ye would hearken unto the Spirit which teacheth a man to pray ye would know that ye must pray; for the evil spirit teacheth not a man to pray, but teacheth him that he must not pray.

“But behold, I say unto you that ye must pray always, and not faint; that ye must not perform any thing unto the Lord save in the first place ye shall pray unto the Father in the name of Christ, that he will consecrate thy performance unto thee, that thy performance may be for the welfare of thy soul.” (2 Nephi 32:8-9.)

How to Pray

When a person “says prayers” he is doing something stimulated by his physical environment. He is repeating words and phrases appropriate to some time or circumstance such as mealtime or the beginning of a meeting. Saying prayers is not a bad thing to do. But it is insufficient.

True prayer begins with a yearning in the soul of man, a reaching out for spiritual contact with God. True prayer grows in strength and efficacy as the Holy Spirit enlivens and guides the yearning soul. The ultimate of true prayer comes as a man is able to submit himself completely to the Lord God whom he has come to love; then what he prays for and how he prays are given to him by the Holy Spirit. This prayer is the obedient response of a little child who, with wonder, awe, and gratitude, worships the true and living God. Of himself, the child of God doesn’t know what to ask for. But through spiritual insight he sees the hand of his Father in all things. His bosom swells with gratitude as he glimpses the wondrous work of holiness. As he is given, he asks for those things which are good in the sight of his God and gives praise and thanks in the same manner. The theme of all is the phrase used by the Savior:

“Thy will, not mine, be done.”

“And if ye are purified and cleansed from all sin, ye shall ask whatsoever you will in the name of Jesus and it shall be done.

“But know this, it shall be given you what you shall ask; and as ye are appointed to the head, the spirits shall be subject unto you.” (D&C 50:29,30.)

It may seem strange that in certain prayers one might simply repeat what he is given to say by the Holy Spirit unless one realizes that true prayer is worship. Its essence is a feeling of the heart. The measure of a prayer is the intensity and the depth of that feeling. Does one hunger to do good in this world? Does that feeling wholly fill his soul? Is he oblivious to everything else but the fact that he is in the presence of his beloved Master? Does he cry out from anguish at the realization of his own nothingness contrasts with the goodness of God? Does he receive the Holy Spirit as a consuming fire to burn out the dross within, almost unto the consuming of his flesh? If these things take place, the child of God is achieving and experiencing what the scriptures call “mighty prayer.” While it is true that this may not happen every day or even often, what poverty of soul entraps one who has never felt the fire of mighty prayer! Having achieved full worship even once would color and heighten every prayer thereafter, for the remainder on one’s life.

To pray, then, one must understand the nature and attributes of God. He must receive of the Holy Spirit and worship in spirit and truth. The more he can deliver himself, body and spirit, to what the Spirit shows him is good, the more humble is his prayer. The more he can focus all that he is and has, the more mighty that worship.

Small wonder that prayer at its greatest is private and individual, an thing done with the door shut. How strange to think of being seen by men at the same time as being honored by God. No wonder the life of a faithful saint is a constant communion with the Master, no matter what else is happening.

“Behold, I went to hunt beasts in the forests; and the words which I had often heard my father speak concerning eternal life, and the joy of the saints, sunk deep into my heart.

“And my soul hungered; and I kneeled down before my Maker, and I cried unto him in mighty prayer and supplication for mine own soul; and all the day long did I cry unto him; yea, and when the night came I did still raise my voice high that it reached the heavens. (Enos 3-4.)

Meditation

The helpmate of mighty prayer is meditation. In meditating, one tries to minimize his involvements with the physical world for a time in order to concentrate on something inner, on ideas and feelings. As a person prays sincerely with the Holy Spirit as his guide, that Spirit will bring to him many thoughts and feelings. This is part of the process of revelation. To take full advantage of this revelation, one would do well to mull over the matter under consideration, piecing together what one already knows with the new insights received.

It is one thing to have a revelation. It is quite another to understand and obey. Understanding comes in the process of careful, prayerful reflections of meditation upon what one has received. To pray is often like asking for food and then being blessed with a sumptuous meal. What would you think of a person who, when thus honored, merely took a sniff, then put the meal on a shelf and left it? Though greatly blessed, he would not be nourished.

So it may be with those who pray and do not meditate. They may have much but may be little edified.

Meditation cannot be taught, because it is something personal and private; it is the venturing of the soul into the unknown. But it can be learned by anyone who has the courage to think for himself. A likely initiation to meditation is to ponder the scriptures, the words of the living and the dead prophets of God. Banish all commentaries for a moment: forget hearsay teaching. What does the Lord actually say? What does the Spirit whisper as to how this passage or that doctrine should be understood? Where two scriptures appear at first reading to be contrary, what is the real intent of each?

That soul who has bravely ventured into the sea of scriptural interpretation, who humbly seeks the guidance of the Holy Spirit and rejects the opinions of men, soon makes a marvelous discovery. In the midst of the tumult of human interpretation there is a rock! He cannot see it, for it is spiritual, but he can plant his feet firmly upon it. Then the winds and waves of opinion can beat upon him from any direction. He is no longer tossed to and fro by every wind and wave, but rests firmly on that rock, and on his own two feet. He now has a foundation for salvation. He has found the rock of revelation from the Savior.

In mulling and pondering the scriptures, our venturer has found the Holy Spirit to be an able and willing guide as well as a comfort and a bulwark. Flashes of insight come. Now he sees how God is both just and merciful. He rejoices to learn how God can govern and control all things yet man can be free. He is overcome as he glimpses what the Savior has done for him. Now, having his own light from eternity, he is a new person, a little child born again in the image of the Master.

Having learned to think, to meditate upon the scriptures, the venturer is now prepared to meditate upon the spiritual gifts that come in connection with his own prayers. Now mighty prayer is so rich an experience that he can hardly contain it. Ideas, hopes, and feelings tumble into his mind, then are carefully fit together under spiritual guidance, into the fabric of his new life. They become part of his robe of righteousness as he prepares to meet the Bridegroom.

He who learns to meditate on the things of the Holy Spirit need never suffer the rebuke that came to Oliver Cowdery:

“Behold, you have not understood; you have supposed that I would give it unto you, when you took no thought save it was to ask me.

“But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right.

“But if it be not right you shall have no such feelings, but you shall have a stupor of thought that shall cause you to forget the thing which is wrong; therefore, you cannot write that which is sacred save it be given you from me.

“Now, if you have known this you could have translated; nevertheless, it is not expedient that you should translate now.

“Behold, it was expedient when you commenced; but you feared, and the time is past, and it is not expedient now.” (D&C 9:7-11.)

Consultation

As a spiritual experience and an access to spiritual life, prayer is like anything of great power is: when misapplied the harm possible is equal to or greater than the good that can be gained from it when correctly applied. The possibility exists in prayer that Satan, who also is a spiritual being and who also delights to give people “revelation,” may attempt to pawn off his own influence as a substitute for the ministrations of the Holy Spirit. The past is full of examples of these devious actions of the adversary beginning with Adam and Eve and extending down to his latest attempts on our own spiritual lives.

When people pray, and especially when they try to make prayer a spiritual experience, Satan stands ready to counterfeit. Some telltale evidences of his influence are feelings that we should give in to the desired of our flesh, that we should do something contrary to the teachings of the scriptures, that we should do things that will bring us the honors of men or the rewards of this world. But the real test is not that simple, for there are occasions when the Lord would have us do something different from what others have been commanded to do, or he may lead us to have the honors of men and rewards of this world. We must be sure that it is the Lord that whispers to us.

One learns to discern the voice of the Spirit through experience. In following spiritual guidance, one can learn surly to tell the difference between the enticings of the Holy Spirit and the temptations of the adversary. To be sure in discerning that difference is perhaps the most essential feature of the transformation of the natural man into the saint. Only then can one show in his life that full and heart-felt faith which is the only means of pleasing God.

It is the heritage of every child in the stakes of Zion to learn from his father and mother how to recognize and live by the still, small voice of the Spirit, thus to know how to worship in mighty prayer. As the children of Zion come to know the voice of the Lord, then can they unite in those mighty prayers that are part of bearing off the Kingdom in triumph.

“And at that day, when I shall come in my glory, shall the parable be fulfilled which I spake concerning the ten virgins.

“For they that are wise and have received the truth, and have taken the Holy Spirit for their guide, and have not been deceived–verily I say unto you, they shall not be hewn down and cast into the fire, but shall abide the day.

“And the earth shall be given unto them for an inheritance; and they shall multiply and wax strong, and their children shall grow up without sin unto salvation. (D&C 45:56-58.)

The Fruit

Another great form of worship of God is the consequence of true prayer. True and mighty prayer ought to lead above all to the doing of righteous deeds. As we pray and partake of the power and true order of heaven, we then should seek to translate the spiritual gifts we have received into the physical actions of our lives. Righteousness is blessing others. Our Master, Jesus Christ, is the fountain of all righteousness. As we humbly pray in his name we are filled with wisdom, with his compassion, with his concern for the poor and the needy with his concern for those who sit in darkness. Being filled with his love, we then go and do those things which we have been shown. In so doing, his pure love becomes our pure love for others.

“Therefore may God grant unto you, my brethren, that ye may begin to exercise your faith unto repentance, that ye begin to call upon his holy name, that he would have mercy upon you;

“Yea, cry unto him for mercy; for he is mighty to save.

“Yea, humble yourselves, and continue in prayer unto him.

“Cry unto him when ye are in your fields, yea, over all your flocks.

“Cry unto him in your houses, yea, over all your household, both morning, mid-day, and evening.

“Yea, cry unto him against the power of your enemies.

“Yea, cry unto him against the devil, who is an enemy to all righteousness.

“Cry unto him over the crops of your fields, that ye may prosper in them.

“Cry over the flocks of your fields, that they may increase.

“But this is not all; ye must pour out your souls in your closets, and your secret places, and in your wilderness.

“Yea, and when you do not cry unto the Lord, let your hearts be full, drawn out in prayer unto him continually for your welfare, and also for the welfare of those who are around you.

“And now behold, my beloved brethren, I say unto you, do not suppose that this is all; for after ye have done all these things, if ye turn away the needy, and the naked, and visit not the sick and afflicted, and impart of your substance, if ye have, to those who stand in need–I say unto you, if ye do not any of these things, behold, your prayer is vain, and availeth you nothing, and ye are as hypocrites who do deny the faith.” (Alma 34:17-28.)

Dr. Chauncey C. Riddle, professor of philosophy and dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University, serves as Sunday School teacher in Orem 16th Ward, Orem Utah Sharon Stake.

Posted in Ensign, Prayer, Restored Gospel | Comments Off on Prayer

Becoming a Disciple

Ensign, September 1974

By Chauncey C. Riddle

If we are serious about following Jesus, we must question all that we previously have been and accepted.

The New Testament account of our Savior’s mortal ministry is a rich treasury of knowledge concerning what one must do to be saved. One insight we may gain concerns what one must do to he a disciple of the Master.

The word disciple comes from the Latin “discipulus,” a learner. A disciple of Christ is one who is learning to be like Christ–learning to think, to feel, and to act as he does. To be a true disciple, to fulfill that learning task, is the most demanding regimen known to man. No other discipline compares with it in either requirements or rewards. It involves the total transformation of a person from the state of the natural man to that of the saint, one who loves the Lord and serves with all of his heart, might, mind, and strength.

As part of his instruction to his disciples in judea, the Savior took pains to explain his own ministry, a ministry that was the pattern for all of them and for us. One thing that the Father required of our Savior was the suffering and sacrifice of the Atonement. Matthew records:

“From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.” (Matt. 16:21.)

Peter, not understanding that only in these difficult things could Jesus fulfill the will of the Father and make universal salvation possible, remonstrated:

“Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be [done] unto thee.” (Matt. 16:22.)

The Savior then administered a severe rebuke to Peter:

“But he turned and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.” Matt. 16:23.)

In calling Peter “Satan.” the Savior suggests the plight of all men. Until we savor (understand) the things of God, we are found to be behind the adversary’s programs! But when we learn the glorious truths of the gospel we can get behind Jesus Christ and his work and abandon Satan.

Within that historical setting is one of the great revelatory insights into the ways of godliness given by the Master. Perceiving Peter’s ignorance and that of the others present, he proceeded to instruct them in the essence of discipleship:

“Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross and follow me.

“And now for a man to take up his cross, is to deny himself all ungodliness, and every worldly lust, and keep my commandments.

“Break not any commandments for to save your lives; for whosoever will save his life in this world, shall lose it in the world to come.

“And whosoever will lose his life in this world, for my sake, shall find it in the world to come.

“Therefore, forsake the world, and save your souls….. (Matt. 16:25-29, Inspired Version.)”

If we take up our own cross we truly become disciples. From the above we learn that discipleship begins with self-denial. Our lives are much like forested land that must be cultivated. Before the word of the Lord can bear fruit in our lives, we must first clear the ground of all that grows wild or naturally. What grows naturally in our lives are the things of the world. As any person comes to spiritual self-consciousness, he will realize that his mind, his desires, his habits, his manners, and his politics have all been shaped by the people in his physical environment. What he hitherto thought to be himself he now sees as the encrustations of the world upon his true self, the newly awakened spirit within. His true self delights in being touched by the Holy Spirit with the witness of the divinity of Jesus Christ and of the urgency of faith and repentance. He finds that to believe in Christ is one thing, but to deliver one’s soul unto Christ as a faithful, obedient servant is quite another thing. That delivery must begin by becoming as a little child.

To be born again as a little child is to question all that we have formerly been and accepted, and to see the world with different eyes, heart, and mind. As a little child, we walk through the forest with one hand in that of the Holy Spirit and the other in that of the living prophets of God.

Our mentors, the prophets and the Holy Spirit, literally turn the old world some of us have known topsy-turvy. In that process we are thrilled to see things freshly, as they really are.

With their help the scriptures become pure, the word of God; the interpolations, the omissions, and interpretations of men no longer cause us to stumble. We learn the joy of seeing the complete harmony between the teachings of the ancient prophets found in canonized scriptures, the teachings of living prophets found in canonized scriptures, the sweet whisperings of the Holy Spirit. To that harmony the promises of God and the necessities of true faith come alive to us, and with hope and faith we begin to become spiritually alive.

With the help of our new friends, the prophets and the Holy Spirit, we can see in our culture that which is truly virtuous, lovely, of good report, and praise-worthy. These things we treasure and delight in. We are also now able to see what is petty, selfish, and evil in our culture. Carefully we dissociate ourselves from those things, grateful to see plainly that those things we once enjoyed were actually part of our misery.

Our new friends help us to review what we have learned about the ideas of men. We gladly respond when we see now that some men have taught truth, sometimes against great odds; but we now perceive the absurdity of some of the world’s most cherished theories. As we see anew, the chains of darkness and the lies of Satan become plain to us, and we slip off those chains, thrilled with the freedom and mobility we now have.

A new perspective, that of eternity, is taught to us by our mentor friends. We now glimpse why it is that family relationships are paramount, why no other success can compensate for failure in our homes. We see why force and compulsion can never be the means of establishing a great and good society. We see that doing good for others is the important thing in life, not just seeking knowledge. We see that the point of repentance is learning to live righteously, so that we can be trusted with the powers of gods. We no longer worry about just being forgiven; we strive to overcome the world.

Perhaps the greatest thing we learn from living prophets and from the Holy Spirit is the importance of doing the best we know at all times. They show us that what we will really be sorry for later is not having done what we plainly know we should have done.

With thankful heart the disciple of Christ thus learns the ways and ideas of the world, to be taught anew in all things by God. But even in this his preparation is not complete: he must next cleanse himself of worldly lust. To eliminate the influence of the world is a difficult thing. But to gain mastery over his own desires is another, even more difficult task. It is like hauling off all the rocks and thoroughly tilling the soil once the forest of his mind has been cleared of false ideas.

What are the rocks of lust in our lives? One is the desire to eat too much, to eat the wrong things, and to eat when we should not. Another is the inability to get to bed on time, to get up on time, or to be where we are supposed to be on time. Rocks of lust are the habits of being absorbed in television or reading when we should be working with our family or doing our home teaching. They are hunger for a new car when the old one would serve as well or better; the desire to have it known to everyone when we have done some good deed; the need to retaliate when someone has hurt us. They are anger, selfishness, loud laughter, and self-indulgence. They are the powers of Satan exercised on us through our own flesh. We can be rid of these things only by yielding to the enticings of the Holy Spirit.

Then our spirit conquers our own flesh and the flesh becomes a servant instead of the master of our lives.

Having cleared our forest of worldliness and having tilled the soil of our souls to a state of ready obedience to the Lord, we are then able to receive the word of God as the pure seed; we are ready to keep the Lord’s commandments.

The first commandment is to love the Lord:

“Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength                                (Mark 12:30.)”

In nothing can one show forth love for God more surely than in making and keeping the baptismal covenant. Therein we promise that we will take Jesus Christ’s name upon us (to stand as a witness of him at all times and in all places), that we will always remember him (never forgetting that we are to rely solely upon his merits), and that we will keep the commandments he has given us: “If ye love me, keep my commandments.”(John 14:15.)

It is thus that the crowning act of repentance is to make the covenant of baptism. As Christ laid down his life for us, so we voluntarily put to death our old worldly, lustful self and bury It in the waters of baptism. As the Savior rose from the dead, so we rise up out of the water as little children of our new Father and Savior, to a beginning of eternal life. Without this death, burial, and newness, we cannot fully show that we love him.

In baptism we gain the privilege of the gift of the Holy Ghost. Only as we live under the influence of that gift can any mortal person love the Lord with all his heart, might, mind, and strength. Only as we continue under the influence of that gift can one keep every commandment.

Above all the other commandments we might receive as we strive to keep the first and great commandment is the second, the admonition to love one another. The world, not understanding the things of God fancies that the second commandment can be kept when one has not honored the first commandment. But those who understand remember the Savior saying:

“A new commandment l give unto you, That ye love one another; as l have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” (John 13:34-35.)

To love as Christ loves is to have charity, the pure love of Christ. Pure love is a gift of the Holy Spirit reserved for those who love the Lord enough to covenant with him in baptism and wlj.i receive his spirit to be with them:

“Jesus saith unto him, I am the way the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6.)

The way of Christ is the way of love. It is to visit the widows and the fatherless in their afflictions; it is to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to visit those in prison, to liberate the captive. But it is to do all this in the Lord’s way, not walking in the ways of the world or following the vain imaginations of our heart as to what is good for others. Pure love is of the Father. Saith our Master:

“I can of mine own self do nothing . . . because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.” (John 5:30.) “l am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and l in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.” (John 15:5.)

Are we the disciples of Jesus Christ? Are we learning of his ways, of his discipline? Arc we doing as he commanded? Do we know we have to overcome the world? No man is saved in ignorance of that knowledge. To gauge our progress we might ask ourselves three questions:

“Have I denied myself all ungodliness?”

“Have l denied myself every worldly lust?”

“Do I keep every commandment the Savior gives me?”

The future of a person who can give an honest affirmative answer to each of these questions is not in doubt. The rest of us should remember that the Lord is mighty to save. Though we cannot overcome the world on our own merits, his are quite sufficient. If we are learning, then we are disciples. May we learn well and be disciples indeed.

Then, instead of the natural forest of worldliness that smothers out all else in our lives, we shall have created a Garden of Eden. As the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory, even so must each individual disciple renew his own personal life in the glory of our God.

[illustrations] Discipleship begins by becoming as a little child and being born again.

[illustration] Becoming a disciple, we perceive the absurdity of some of the world’s most cherished theories. The chains of darkness, the lies of Satan, become pain to us. We slip off those chains, thrilled with the freedom and mobility we now have.

[photo] Becoming a disciple, we yield to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, haul away all the rocks of lust, break habits of being absorbed in television or reading when we should be working with our family or doing our home teaching.

[photo] Becoming a disciple, we learn a new perspective of eternity, we glimpse why it is that family relationships are paramount, why no other success can compensate for failure in our homes, why force and compulsion can never establish a great society.

Dr. Chauncey Riddle is a professor of philosophy and dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University. He teaches Sunday School in Orem 16th Ward, Orem Utah Sharon West Stake.

Posted in Ensign, Restored Gospel | Tagged , | Comments Off on Becoming a Disciple

Mormonism and the Nature of Man

CHAUNCEY C. RIDDLE is Dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University, where he has been a faculty member since 1952.

He has earned the reputation of master teacher during his distinguished educational career. He earned the B.S. degree in mathematics and physics at BYU, and then at­tained the M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in philos­ophy at Columbia University in the City of New York.

He has been an active member of the Church and at present is a high councilor in the Sharon Stake.

His wife is the former Bertha Janis All­red. and they are the parents of twelve chil­dren, ten of whom are living.

MORMONISM AND THE NATURE OF MAN

Chauncey C. Riddle

Mormonism and the Nature of Man - To the Glory of God - Mormon Essays

Quoted from the book – To the Glory of God – Mormon Essays on Great Issues

The purpose of this paper is to delineate some of the factors pertinent to a monistic (literally “one thing”) con­ception of man as contrasted with a dualistic conception. In the monistic thinking presently in vogue, man is seen as a material being wholly governed by the laws of the universe as discovered and formulated by science. Some persons grant that man has a spirit, but in their accounts of and treatment of man, the spiritual aspect is nonfunctional; such persons may appear to be dualists but are here classed as functional monists. The dualistic concept entertained in this paper posits mortal man as a spirit, which is the real person, and a body, which is the tabernacle of the spirit person. Though both the spirit and the body are of a material nature, dualism ob­tains because each represents a different order of matter this difference is manifest in that the set of laws and influences governing the spirit aspect of man is different from that which governs the fleshly body. Basic to this whole dis­cussion, of course, is the assumption that law and order gov­ern all things in the universe, that all events are caused, and that there is a regularity or uniformity in the universe.

The thesis of this paper is that the key concepts of the gospel of Jesus Christ have consistency and significance only when one conceives of mortal man as a dualistic being, these values being lost if a monistic conception is adopted. The key concepts here discussed are the fall of Adam, free agency, spirituality, sin, the atonement of Jesus Christ, salvation, and righteousness.

The Fall

Before the fall, Adam and Eve were In a monistic state, we may presume, because they were subject to only one set of laws and influences, those of God. Their whole being was of a spiritual order, with spirit matter being the life-substance of their bodies. In this condition the range of their freedom was limited; they simply responded positively to the commands of the Father.

The influence of Satan in tempting Eve and Adam in the garden brought a new and opposing set of forces and laws to bear. The Father granted Adam and Eve freedom in the garden in that he allowed the influence of Satan to work upon them. He allowed them to choose between His in­fluence and that of Satan. Eve, having been deceived by Satan, and Adam, choosing to follow her into mortality, the anticipated death came upon our first parents. In this process their bodies were rendered spiritually dead; spirit was re­placed by blood in their veins and their spiritual bodies lost the ability to perceive things in a spiritual order.

Fallen Adam was a paradigm of dualism in that his body was fully of the order of what we call physical matter, sub­ject to the laws and forces of a fallen realm, while his spirit, though within the physical body, was yet subject to the laws and forces of the spiritual order of the universe. The true person, the spirit, was now set in opposition to the physical body, since each was subject to a different set of laws and forces. The Fall was thus a sundering of man, resulting in a duality. This duality is the basis of both conflict and progress in the individual person.

What would the Fall mean if man were construed monistically? Under monism, death could only be physical; if literal, the death of the body. But since physical death is explicitly not part of the Fall, a monist must reject a literal interpretation. When the spiritual death of the Fall is con­strued non-literally, it is usually seen either as a change of place. the process of being cast out of the presence of God, or as a change of the nature of man. Change of place (re­moval from the Garden of Eden) did occur, but this change does not exhaust the scriptural teaching concerning the Fall. If man’s monistic nature were considered to change in the Fall, that change could only be accounted for by external forces. Under a monistic system, there is only one set of laws and forces. It follows that there could be no meaningful choice, and thus Adam could not be held responsible for his fall. If Adam is not responsible for his fall, he is likewise not responsible in any way to the opportunity of redemption. This, of course, renders the gospel meaningless.

Free Agency

Freedom is the opportunity to choose; agency is power. Man’s free agency is then the freedom to choose and the power to attain what is chosen. Whereas God is completely free, man is but infinitesimally free; but man is free enough to respond to the influence of God, by means of which influence to become like God, or to respond to Satan and by means of that contrary influence to become like Satan.

The free agency of man, then, is limited, specific. It is a freedom given of God to the spirit in man to become free of the dominating influence of one’s own physical body. It is the freedom and power to respond to the commandments of God through the Holy Spirit, thus bringing the flesh into subjection by overcoming the power and influence of Satan, which operates through the flesh. As father Lehi put it, the agency of man is to be “free according to the flesh.” When that freedom is full and final, the body of man functions only under the powers, forces, and influences of the spiritual order of existence. This is to say that Satan never again has power over that being. He is free forever.

If man is construed monistically, freedom from the flesh makes no sense, for this man is only flesh. On the mo­nistic view if man feels free, it is either a psychological illu­sion or simply a physical freedom of a physical body to act without external restraint. Under monism, self-discipline is meaningless, for all discipline is a thing that must be superimposed upon a person by outside force. Monistic free­dom is the absence of that dualistic freedom, discipline of the body by the spirit, which the gospel affords.

Spirituality

In the gospel, spirituality is the condition of the spirit of a person being responsive to the commandments and influences of God, specifically the influence of the Holy Spirit. Spirituality is manifest in the control wherein the walking, talking, eating, drinking, working, etc., of a person are models of fulfilling the words of words of the prophets of God to the degree to which the person is spiritual. The more spiritual a person is, the more complete and absolute will be the discipline of the spirit over the body.

It should not be supposed that spirituality enjoins what is often called “asceticism.” While self-denial is a frequent choice of a spiritual person, pleasure of itself is not consid­ered an evil. But pleasure is not sought for its own sake. A spiritual person seeks first the kingdom of God and then to establish in the earth the righteousness of God. In the of duty of serving God and blessing his fellowmen, the spiritual person­ will strive for health, cleanliness, comeliness, strength, and skill. But these arc sought as means, not as ends. They are means by which to glorify God and to build his kingdom, and are an integral part of the control of the appetites and proclivities of the physical tabernacle of the spirit. Further­more, this control, when sought for the glory of God, re­dounds to the blessing of the person spiritually and tempo­rally. One of the blessings will be pleasure that is pure, un­mixed with lust, because it is allowed rather than directly sought. Pleasure that is spiritually pure does not turn to pain, regret, and remorse of conscience as do pleasures sought to gratify the appetites of the flesh.

Especially noteworthy is that the more splritual a person becomes the less he will depend upon physical evidence (through the flesh) as to what he believes. This does not mean he ignores physical evidence; he accepts the responsi­bility of accounting for it, but he believes and interprets all things as he is instructed by the Holy Spirit. He will not judge on the basis of appearance.

Under a monistic system, spirituality must be classed with insanity. Since the bodies of men are demonstrably very similar, any person who does not respond “normally” to physical stimulus must be tagged as “abnormal”-insane. The more spiritual one is, the more suspect he would become to persons espousing the monistic view. Persons with great self-control cause those without it to wonder and to feel uncomfortable. To sin a little, to laugh at the possibility of perfection, to justify pleasure sought for its own sake are normal to the monist. Youth, strength, and worldly learning are honored above all else in monistic thinking because they represent the fullest accommodation and power in the realm of the physical, the realm of the flesh.

The monist also takes a curious stance of omniscience. He will not pretend in theory to know all things, but will assert that he does know all the factors pertinent to a given social problem and can therefore prescribe its solution. Thus he reserves to himself a practicing omniscience. Having de­nied the existence and influence of God, as a naturalist, he finds it necessary to pronounce himself at least a demi-god in order to justify rationally his practical decisions; or his intellectual systems and heroes become his demi-god. Judging by appearance and arrogating to himself sufficiency, the mo­nist has left a trail of blood, slavery, and failure, confronted only occasionally by a John the Baptist or a Socrates who points out that he does not really know what he is doing. But the monist has ways of dealing with John and with Socrates.

To a monist, spiritual people are indistinguishable from spiritualists-those possessed of evil spirits; both are classed as insane because they do not act “normally.” History shows that what is “normal” changes from age to age. There are vogues as to what is socially acceptable, fostering first one species and degree of carnality, then another. But the gospel is the same in every age: dominion of spirit over body through the gifts of God through Jesus Christ.

Sin

Sin in the gospel is breaking a commandment of God; it is acting to yield to the influence of the world upon the flesh rather than responding to the influence of God upon the spirit. Faith is willing obedience to God’s. Holy Spirit, and whatsoever is not of faith is sin. Sin is the triumph of the flesh over the spirit, and is therefore the triumph of Satan over the person.

In a monistic system there is no meaningful concept of sin. People are said to act strictly according to their heredity and environment, and are not to be blamed for any act. Since they are not free. To change people’s actions means simply to change the influences that touch them. Monists say that it is institutions of society that control men s actions. This is why control of educational programs and information media are crucial to the monist-though he never can quite account for how the governor of the system can himself escape what he is trying to cure in those whom he “benevo­lently” controls. The monist does not fathom the concept of repentance, because it, too, has no gospel meaning in this thought. He will look upon sex sin as “normal” and excuse my offender as if it were a light thing. Should he be a church worker, he may see social control (socialism) as the ultimate panacea, and think that in promoting social control he is doing God a favor.

The Atonement

The atonement of Jesus Christ is the central and crown­ing concept of the gospel. In living a perfect life as a dual being, Christ overcame the power of Satan. His life was the great triumph of spirit over flesh, the example and pat­tern for all mankind. In his death, the Savior climaxed that triumph by seizing from Satan the keys of death. Through his suffering in taking the bitter cup, the Savior satisfied the demands of justice, making possible for all men an eternity free from the consequences of sin. Through his sacrifice of his life, the Savior made it possible for all men to be raised again in the resurrection with a spiritual physical body, thereafter to serve God through the spirit in eternity. As in Adam man became dual and fallen, even so in Christ men may be made spiritual and whole again, redeemed to the spiritual order of existence of their own choice.

In a monistic system, the atonement of Christ can only by the suffering and death of just another person, having efficacy for us only as it might affect us in a physical way. A monist would see the atonement at best as a symbol, as a noteworthy deed, as an ultimate protest. But he will see no connection between the shedding of the Savior’s blood and the forgiveness of our sins, since the physical world affords no such causal connections; in fact, he is likely to be ap­palled by this idea and see it as a barbaric superstition. Thus it is possible that one who in the relative innocence of youth was cleansed and forgiven through the blood of Christ might later in his state of monistic “erudition’ shed the blood of Christ afresh and put him to an open shame, not being able then to see any point in the atonement.

Salvation

Salvation in the gospel is to come to be beyond the power of one’s enemies. It is a thing of degree, progress­ing step by step as the spirit of a person triumphs over his own flesh through faith in Jesus Christ. Considered in the aspect of being able to stop sinning, salvation is self­-denial of the lusts of the flesh, and the ultimate demonstra­tion of it is in voluntarily giving up the life of the body. Only in our death is salvation fully manifest and only in willingness to die is it fully attainable. To be free of the control of the flesh, through faith in Christ and through death, is to be forever free from Satan. If through the Savior we also gain a remission of the sins we have committed, we can then go on to inherit all that Christ has.

But salvation for the monist is quite opposite. It is ease, opulence, pleasure, comfort, and security for the flesh. The greatest of all evils for the monist is pain, though pain is challenged for that position by death. The body is the object of concern, the thing to pamper and perpetuate. Sacrifice of things material is a great misfortune. Indeed, the monist often conceives it the moral obligation of the man who has physical salvation to furnish it to others who do not; thus the monist tends to choose coercive redistributive legislation over freedom of choice and conscience. He does not even comprehend the voluntary charity of a free agent, since he cannot comprehend either charity or agency in the gospel sense.

Righteousness

In the gospel, righteousness is the way a man acts toward his neighbor when he has overcome the flesh through Christ. It is the power and authority of a saved being to bless others in leading them to Christ. A righteous man is concerned about both the physical and the spiritual needs of his fellowmen, but has no illusion that the physical needs are greater. He has kept the great law and loves the Savior with all his heart, might, mind, and strength. And because he has kept the commandments of Christ, he is able then to love his fellowmen with the same pure love that he receives from the Savior. His goal is to make a heaven on earth where all who want to be saved can be saved, where Christ and his pure love reign supreme, where spirit has triumphed over the flesh. This involves concern for the temporal, for the material circumstances of Oleo, as well as the spiritual. But the spiritual aspect of things is always seen as the key to progress in the material realm.

For the monist, righteousness has little meaning because sin has little meaning. To the monist, righteousness could be but conformity to human norms. The problem which the monist ever pursues is how to make a society of pleasure­ seeking people productive enough to give each person all the fleshly freedom and pleasure he wants. Since that goal has never been attained (and obviously, to a dualist, cannot be attained) the substitute is slavery. With slavery, at least some can enjoy fleshly freedom and pleasure even if others have to suffer. The the long series of social arrangements to per­petuate control of one person by another; clergy over lay, nobles over commoners, powerful over weak, educated over uneducated, majority over minority, voters over taxpayers, caste systems, party members over non-party members, etc. –all are bolstered by religious or moralizing theories, and all anti-Christ. Now the real question of the whole matter is simply this: Is the universe monistic or dualistic? If the universe is mo­nistic, then all the attendant ideas so abhorrent to the dualist are true, and the dualist is indeed insane. But if the universe is dualistic, if there is a real Savior Jesus Christ in opposition to and opposed by a real Satan, then man is a dual being, spirit opposed to flesh, and the monist is indeed in sin.

The answer would seem to lie within the individual. Does he acknowledge the voice of conscience which warns him not to yield to the lusts of the flesh? Has he sought for the influence of God through humble prayer? Has he ex­perimented with the word of God to see if the promises are fulfilled? The testimony of the prophets is plain. They teach us of God. They teach us of dualism. They teach us to ex­periment honestly with our own conscience, to observe the fruits of doing the best which we know. It would seem that only the honest in heart can acknowledge the things of God, and that only those who hunger and thirst after righteousness can fully find the means by which to come unto God.

The whole purpose of life is to bring under subjection the animal passions, proclivities, and tendencies, that we might rea1ize the companionship always of God’s Holy Spirit.

-David O. McKay

Posted in Essay | Tagged , | Comments Off on Mormonism and the Nature of Man

A Matter of Life and Death

JAMES E. TALMAGE LECTURE SERIES

1970-1971

by Chauncey C. Riddle

You have all heard the saying, “Fools rush in. . .” We have selected topics tonight that are interesting but usually discussions of these topics are quite charged with emotion. My hope is that we can discuss these rather dispassionately, looking at them coolly in the light of certain things that we know to be true.

I propose that we would examine these issues in the light of an LDS frame of reference. I warn you in advance this is my conception of an LDS frame. We have no established creed and therefore each individual must try to find that true frame for himself. l think that one of the glories of the gospel is that no one is required to believe a certain way.

Because of that, of course, we can all grow and perfect our understanding as we have experiences and opportunities to have spiritual insight.

The beginning point of our discussion is on a point fundamental to all. We begin with the point that there are absolute moral laws in the universe. I take it that this is a proposition that is even prior to the existence of God. The fact that there is a right and a wrong to every question is fundamental to our existence. My understanding is that God is God because he recognizes, obeys, and sustains those absolute moral laws of the universe. Should he cease to act on and sustain those laws, he himself would cease to be God. His station is contingent upon His recognition of this. Therefore, it is important for us to recognize the importance of these laws in our lives.

The work of God, who is an exalted man, is to help us to become exalted. As his children, his only purpose is to bless us. This means that God’s work in everything he does–every word, every act–is intended to benefit His children. We speak of curses, of judgments, of the wrath of God, and so forth. My comprehension of these things, however, is that these are not simply vindictive reactions; that they are all intended for the betterment, for the blessing, and for the eventual happiness of the persons to whom they are given. As we see the scriptures in that light, they take on quite a different meaning. The work of God is to bless each of His children as much as each can stand. l take it that in the eternities every person will be as happy as he can possibly be. For some it is not possible to be very happy, but nevertheless they will be as happy as they can be.

One of the great deliverances of the omniscience and omnipotence of God is the assurance that every person will be as happy as he can be. God’s power is sufficient to that end and thus He can guarantee it. Each of us is an individual personality which was not created by God. God, howùever, took us in to his association and seeks to bless us that we might have the opportunity to become like Him. He has clothed us first in a spirit body like His and now in a physical tabernacle made in His image. The question is, will we come to act after His pattern, to be in His image mentally and morally? If we can do this, he holds out the opportunity of inheriting, of being blessed to receive ALL that He has.

God, however, cannot bless His children indiscriminately. He can bless them only according to their own righteousness. He is bound by the moral absolute laws of the universe. As we struggle with and overcome temptations that face us, the more we can live by those laws, and the more He can bless us. So His program is one of teaching us, opening the way to righteousness, that we might be able to live by that standard.

Righteousness, in my definition, is doing good for one’s fellow beings. This is what makes it absolute. Each individual has a certain nature. Each has a certain potential quotient of happiness. It is our work as righteous beings to contribute to the happiness of other beings. If we help every other person we contact to be as happy as they can be, then we are participating in the work of God, which is the work of righteousness. Righteousness, of course, cannot exist except as the act of a free agent. Though I might do something that might help someone be happy–if I don’t do it freely it is not a righteous act on my part, even though it might be done for his good. Free agency, then, becomes a matter of concern to us.

A free agent is first of all an intelligent being. Secondly- he is a being who has knowledge of the important alternatives. That is to say, he must know both good as well as evil. A person might be said to be somewhat free (that is to say, he could make choices) if he knew several varieties of evil. But the real freedom of choice is the freedom to know the good; to know what is righteous to do in a particular case.

Man of himself cannot know righteousness. A man can know what he feels is for his own good, but he cannot know what is good for another or for himself. We are simply not that intelligent or perceptive, and therefore we must rely upon God to know what is right. That is why the scriptures say that the Savior is the fountain of ALL righteousness. No person can act righteously apart from Him and from His power. So to become free, a man must come unto Christ.

The third characteristic of the free agent is the power to carry out his own choice. We know good from evil or right from wrong. We need then the power to act according to choice. Again, this is the gift of God. In God we live and move and have our being. Were it not for His sustaining &power, we could not draw a single breath. The most evil man on the earth perpetrates his evil because of the gift of Cod who has given him his life, his power, his intelligence, his opportunity to act. All men, then, at one stage or another of their probation, are made partially free agents by God. They are given the opportunity to choose, the opportunity to carry out these choices to a sufficient extent that they can establish to themselves, to God, and to everyone else, just how righteous they are. God, then, gives man a limited free agency. No mortal on the earth has all of it, because each of us have a limited knowledge and a limited power.

We are given the parable of the talents that we might understand that if we do well with this little bit of agency that we have, we shall be given more. As we use that more to the same degree of righteousness, the time will come when we need not be limited in every way as to knowledge or as to power. This state we call exaltation, or the attainment of the office of Godhood.

We have, then, these two alternatives which face us in our lives. We may act selfishly, which is to choose our own good, or we may act unselfishly, which is to act righteously, to choose the good of others. Basically, this is the dilemma of each choice we face. Do we seek to save our own lives, to promote our own good? Or do we seek to promote the work of others? The work of Godliness is to promote the good of others. But each of us, being individuals and having agency, some people wish simply to promote their own good. This is the reason for the evil in this world, God allows it, but men choose it and carry it out. Therefore, both men and Cod are responsible.

God has done something about His part. In fact, the Savior has taken upon Himself the sins of the whole world, of every living creature. He did this because He has allowed those sins. He gave men the agency to commit sin, therefore He personally suffers for them. But He does this because He wants to achieve two things: First, He absolves Himself of responsibility for them. Second, He makes possible the forgiveness of sins for those who turn away from selfishness and learn to be righteous beings. Those who will not turn away then have the opportunity to suffer for their own sins, to make their own recompense.

The basic choice of men is between selfishness and unselfishness. Another way to put it is that our choice is between yielding to the lust of the flesh and yielding to the enticings of the Holy Spirit. It turns out that our problem in this world, having passed our first estate, is to come down here to see if we can cope with the physical body. If we can subdue it, learn to master it and control it, then we need not be limited–that is to say, damned. We can receive an inheritance of all things. But if it turns out that upon achieving this opportunity of a body of flesh and bone like God, that it overwhelms us and Satan continues to the end of our probation to have power over us through our flesh, then we must be limited. We will all be privileged to have a body continue with us into eternity, but the body will have power only to that degree that we learn to be righteous in our probation. We are constantly faced then with this challenge. Do we do what we do because our bodies desire it, or do we do what we do because our spirit desires to do the will of God, to do what is righteous, to bless our fellow man?

All of this raises the question of the position of pleasure in the framework of the gospel. I understand that righteous men do not seek pleasure for its own sake. They seek to do the Lord’s will. In doing the Lord’s will, they may be called upon to undergo considerable sacrifice, pain, anguish, difficulty. But it turns out that those who seek to do the Lord’s will in blessing others also, in line of their duty in serving God, encounter pleasure. That pleasure they thus encounter is not evil. In fact, they are entitled to enjoy it and usually their enjoyment is heightened. They enjoy pleasure more because of the fact that they are not seeking it for its own sake. They seek righteousness and it is strictly a byproduct. You will find that spiritual people take great delight in certain pleasures. They are very much impressed by the beauties of nature, for instance. They take pleasure in good music, often in good food, especially in good company. These pleasures are good, and servants of the Lord certainly enjoy them, but they do not seek them for their own sake. That is the key.

We might next ask, what is the place of sex? My understanding of sex is that it is a holy, divine institution. It is an act ordained and commanded of God. He tells us that a man should leave his father and mother and cleave unto his wife and they twain shall be one flesh. I understand God’s prime purpose in allowing this opportunity is to give man an opportunity to participate with Him in the life-forming process. The work and glory of God is to beget children and to bless them. If a man would become like God, then the work and glory of that man will be to beget children and to bless them as God does. He will bless them with knowledge of the opportunities of righteousness, so that they too may obtain the inheritance available to all of us as heirs of Jesus Christ. Sex is a most beautiful, a most sacred, a most wonderful opportunity, a very precious aspect of love. But that love must not be what the world calls love; it must be the pure love of Christ. The pure love of Christ is different from worldly love because it is not self-seeking in any way. It is unmixed with selfishness and therefore it is pure. The word chastity itself means purity. It comes from the Latin word for “pure.”

A person who is pure, then, and who remains chaste even in marriage is one who does not seek simply pleasure but seeks to do the works of righteousness under the direction of God. There is only one marriage which is recognized by, in the full sense, and ordained of God. This is a marriage between two people who have come unto Christ and have taken upon themselves His name. They have entered upon the straight and narrow way of righteousness that leads to exaltation. They have been forgiven of their sins. They have covenanted to receive the powers of the priesthood and in their marriage they are consecrated in a very special way to do the work of God in begetting children. If their love of the Lord is sufficiently great, their sex life will be for the purpose of begetting children to the glory of Cod. This is not to say that they will not enjoy it. They can and they will. Their joy in righteousness will be much greater than anything that can be had outside the bonds that God has ordained.

If we see the essence of sex as a life-forming process, then we see how important it is to unite only a righteous person and with the righteous person that God has appointed. This is a stewardship. We do not own our own bodies and therefore we do not have a right to give our bodies to anyone. Only God, who owns our bodies, has that right. It is His stewardship to give us in marriage. We have the quaint custom in the world of the father giving the bride away, That is simply a dim recollection of the day when men knew of the glory of God and recognized that only God gives the bride away. As God does this, He gives a man and a woman to each other who are fit parents, and they are fit because they are covenant servants of Christ. To engage in sexual intercourse in any other circumstance is a defeat of the whole purpose and plan of God because children would then be born to parents who are not worthy to be parents in the full sense, and who will not bring up their children in the nurture of God. Therefore, the plan is frustrated. Our Father knew that many children would be born without a knowledge of the gospel with terrible handicaps go far as righteousness is concerned. Therefore, He organized not only families, but a Church that there might be foster fathers and mothers to teach the Gospel to everyone. Our Father also organized a spirit world so that if someone should have to go through this whole life without hearing the gospel, they would still have the chance to hear it and have the chance to be righteous. But the ideal, nevertheless, is that men should be born into homes of covenant servants of God, to be blessed as the children of God should be.

Unchastity, then, is a double evil because it seeks pleasure for pleasure’s sake first, and is secondly a life-forming act outside of one’s stewardship. It is a rejection of God’s order. It is on a par with the sin of priestcraft.

We might note a parallel between the righteous action of a true servant of God contrasted with priestcraft. On one hand the ideal is to be chaste and pure and to be a true representative of God, a true servant of the Lord holding the priesthood. One step removed from this is unchastity or indulging in sexual intercourse outside the bounds the Lord has prescribed. The priesthood correlation of this is being a law unto oneself. Those who have the true priesthood are not laws unto themselves. They function in the order of the priesthood within the kingdom of God. They find their place and serve well in their place. But when people reject the priesthood, they become a law unto themselves. An evil that is worse than unchastity is prostitution, which is unchastity for the sake of gain. Worse than being a law unto oneself is to pretend to be God to someone else for gain. This is priestcraft.

It is interesting to me how parallel these two sins are in the world. Unchastity and being a law unto oneself go together. Prostitution and priest craft and the problems we are talking about tonight are marvelously promoted by priestcraft in this world.

I take it then that life-forming under the priesthood of God is the most important activity of adults in this world, which, of course, can only be done correctly by covenant servants of the Lord. This work has two phases. First, temporal or physical aspect which is blessed and made holy by chastity and an eternal or spiritual aspect which is blessed and made possible through priesthood. Life-forming, then, is ultimately God’s power and doing. Without Him we could not do this. But we may participate with Him. I think the closest any being on this earth ever comes to a celestial state of existence is where there is a priesthood home of faith, where children are wanted and are loved.

The prophets have given us plain and simple counsel on this. They have instructed us that those who love the Lord will not artificially prevent life formation. To put it bluntly, they will not artificially control the size of their families. There is a natural way to do that. If people for some righteous legitimate reason need not to have children at a given time, the simple way to do it is to abstain. But those who live for pleasure find abstinence an unduly great burden. They do various things that break the commandments of God. It is popular in the world we live in both to prevent and to extinguish life in behest of pleasure. These are acts of selfishness, or in other words, sin. They are indications of subjection to Satan. They are thwarting the work of God and worst of all, the usurping of the prerogatives of God.

Abortion is the deliberate taking of life after participating in giving it. If we wish to associate with the Gods in the giving of life, then we must remember that we have not been given the authority to take it. We don’t have the power to give it solely of ourselves and we should not usurp the power to take it. The taking of life is God’s prerogative except under very special conditions which He has laid down, Abortion then is one form of the shedding of blood, or to put it bluntly, it is a form of murder. Those who indulge in it for whatever purpose, except where there might be a case where this art is commanded by God, are guilty of sin.

My question to you is this: Can a society which countenances and justifies such action long endure? You can look at nations which have practiced this for a long, long time. Some seem to prosper, but I think there is one group that can never prosper in sin. These are the house of Israel, the servants of the Lord, Wicked people may sometimes inhabit promised lands, but covenant people cannot when they are wicked.

I believe that if you and l and the membership of this Church were ever to descend into this pit and begin practicing abortion that God would destroy us. It is one thing for people who know not God to do these things. It is quite another thing for people who know God to do it. One point of the gospel is no one need be subjected to Satan. No one need live for pleasure. There are things so much greater than the physical pleasures of this life which come through the gospel. To live a real human life is to partake of the fullness of the ordinances of the gospel and the joy which only God can give and only God does give to the righteous. To prefer immediate physical pleasure to that I take to be a form of insanity.

Let us turn for a moment to a discussion of capital punishment. In the scriptures we find some rather instructive statements about the nature of capital punishment, beginning in Genesis, Chapter 9. I am reading from the inspired version. You may not find some of these things in the King James’ version:

Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons’ wives with him. And every beast, every creeping thing, every fowl upon the earth after their kinds went forth out of the ark. And Noah built him an altar unto the Lord and took of every clean beast and every clean fowl and offered burnt offerings upon the altar and gave thanks unto the Lord and rejoiced in his heart.

Noah did this, of course, because he was commanded. That was his reason for taking the blood of these animals,

And the Lord blessed Noah and Noah smelled a sweet savor and he said in his heart, l will call upon the name of the Lord that he will not again curse the ground anymore for man’s sake for the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth.

Just before this in the flood social conditions became so bad that the only thought of men’s hearts was to do evil continually. When that is the case, there is no point in life, so God destroyed man, leaving only those who were committed to his covenants. Noah being the realist that he was knew that as children began to be born again, they would fall into the same pattern and they would again begin to be evil because of the tremendous power of Satan. He was desirous that the Lord would not again destroy life with a flood:

And that he will not again smite every living thing as he hath done while the earth remaineth and that seed time and harvest and cold and heat and summer and winter and day and night may not cease with man. And God blessed Noah and his sons and said unto them, Be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth and the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth and upon every fowl of the air and upon all that moveth upon the earth. And upon all the fishes of the sea, into your hand are they delivered.

I wonder what that means: “the fear of you.” I think we might have some interesting thoughts there trying to understand this in terms of as man should fear God so the animals should fear man.

Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.

But the blood of all flesh which I have given unto you for meat shall be shed upon the ground which taketh life thereof; and the blood ye shall not eat.

And surely blood shall not be shed, only for meat to save your life. And the blood of every beast will I require at your hands.

And whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for man shall not shed the blood of man. For a commandment I give that every man’s brother shall preserve the life of man for in mine own image have I made man. And a commandment I give unto you, be fruitful and multiply and bring forth abundantly upon the earth and multiply therein.

This is the first reference we have to the principle of capital punishment. We might ask why the principle of capital punishment? Why would God command that if a man shed another’s blood his blood must be taken. Part of the answer to this is given in Exodus 11. I am going to take the liberty to read a good deal of this presuming that not many of you read Exodus 11 very often,

He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death.

And if a man lie not in wait, but God deliver him into his hand; then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee.

This verse apparently is a distinction between murder which is pre-meditated, that is to say lying in wait, and manslaughter, which a person might do accidently. They are both killing, but there is a way out for a person who commits unpremeditated murder or manslaughter. There is a place of refuge where he can go. But for the one who murders, the only out is for him to give his own life,

But if a man come presumptuously upon his neighbor, to slay him with guile; thou shalt take him from mine altar, that he may die.

And he that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death,

And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be Put to death. . .

And if men strive together, and one smite another with a stone, or with his fist, and he die not, but keepeth his bed:

If he rise again, and walk abroad upon his staff, then shall he that smote him be quit: only he shall pay for the loss of his time, and shall cause him to be thoroughly healed.

And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall surely be put to death.

Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two and recover, he shall not put to death for he is his servant.

If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.

And if any mischief follow. then thou shalt give life for life,

Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.

And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye’s sake.

And if he smite out his manservant’s tooth, or his maid- servant’s tooth; he shall let him go free for his tooth’s sake.

If an ox gore a man or a woman, that they die: then the ox shall surely be stoned, and his flesh shall not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall be quit.

But if the ox were wont to push with his horn in time past, and it has been testified to his owner, and he hath not kept him in, but that he hath killed a man or a woman; the ox shall be stoned, and his owner also shall be put to death.

If there be laid on him a sum of money, then he shall give for the ransom of his life whatsoever is laid upon him.

Whether he have gored a son, or have gored a daughter, according to his judgment shall it be done unto him.

If the ox shall push a manservant or a maidservant; he shall give unto their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned.

And if a man shall open a pit, or if a man shall dig a pit, and not cover it, and an ox or an ass fall therein;

The owner of the pit shall make it good, and give money unto the owner of them; and the dead beast shall be his.

And if one man’s ox hurt another’s, that he die; then they shall sell the live ox, and divide the money of it; and the dead ox also shall they divide.

The point is this. They didn’t have jails in Israel. What did they have instead? They had justice. What is justice? Justice is the man receiving his rights. When a man injured another, instead of putting people in jail for it, which doesn’t do the injured party any good at all, the injured party had the right to receive recompense–that is to say, he bad the right to be paid, not necessarily an eye for an eye, but the price of an eye for an eye; the price of a tooth for a tooth; or the price of an ox for an ox; and so forth. If a person did wrong, he must pay for it; he must pay for it; he must make recompense. It is a curious thing that in our so-called enlightened civilization, we have rather lost sight of the concept of justice. When a person commits a wrong against another man, we are willing to put him in jail, but we make no demand that he restore, that he benefit the one whom he has injured. Because we have lost the concept of justice in that regard, we seem also to have lost the concept of justice in regard to murder. It is fashionable in our society today to speak against capital punishment, to think that somehow it is an act of mercy or righteousness or goodness to let the murderer go free. I submit to you it is exactly the contrary: that letting the murderer go free shows a complete misunderstanding of humanity and the rights of man. If we let the murderer go free, we are saying in essence, that the life of the one whom he has murdered has no worth. Are we prepared to make that judgment?

The only person who can legitimately excuse the murderer is either the person himself who was killed or someone who has paid the debt for that murder, which could only be God himself.

There are only two people, then, who are able to forgive a murderer: the person murdered and God. If man takes it upon himself to forgive a murderer, he is saying then that the life of the person murdered it worth nothing–it needs no recompense. No justice needs to be done. Nothing needs to be satisfied.

God commanded, then, that if a man sheds another man’s blood and kills him, that his blood must be shed. That is the only way that justice can be satisfied.

There are some side benefits to that; namely, if a man has no rights in society he can be killed without any recompense. What is there to stop murder? Nothing. Thus, sin and this kind of taking opportunity against a man’s neighbor run rampart. A society cannot be well ordered if there is no justice.

What do we do then? If we forgive a man for murder, having no right to do so, then we are accountable to God and to the murdered man for it. We become guilty of the murder. This is why the prophets say in the scriptures that if we do not take a man’s blood when he has shed another’s blood, that blood is upon us. The only way injustice can be answered is by justice. So, I submit to you that it is not noble to give a reprieve to a murderer. It is on the contrary a complete despising of human life, or a pretension to the prerogatives of Godhood, which is a species of priestcraft.

I think it would be valuable now to delineate the frame of mind that justifies abortion and the elimination of capital punishment. It is first of all naturalistic. That is to say, persons of this mind do not believe there is a God in the universe. Because they do not believe there is a Cod, they do not believe there can be such a thing as righteousness. Because there is no God, there is no such thing as justice, because only God can guarantee justice.

Second, it is monistic in metaphysics. Persons of this mind believe that man is only a body and is a chance evolutionary creation of the ongoing blind processes of the universe. Because this is all that life is, life is cheap. Life is not important. There is no problem in either doing away with it or in dismissing its worth.

Thirdly, the frame espouses amorality. That is to say that morals don’t count. There is no right or wrong. Persons of this mind say that the so-called standards of right and wrong are simply cultural traditions that reflect the prejudices of some persons and have no basis in the reality of the universe. All three of these principles, you see, are contrary to the teachings of the gospel.

The purpose of the gospel is to teach man a correct understanding as to who they are and what their existence is. The purpose of Satan is to substitute lies for these truths that men may be confused, and being confused, they step into the paths of evil and wrongdoing very readily, not knowing the landmarks.

As I came over tonight I was trudging along through the snow and I suddenly noticed that the path I was following led right across the lawn. I happen to be one of those who believe in not walking across the lawn because I know what it does to the lawn. I would rather have a nice, green lawn than a muddy patch. So I felt a little bit chagrined that I had been trapped into just following the path. That happened, of course, because the landmarks had gone. Everything was covered with snow, and I was enticed into doing something that I would not otherwise do by this blindness.

This is very similar to what happens in the world. As Satan can substitute false ideas for the true concepts, the landmarks are gone in men’s minds and they fall into the evil paths and don’t know that they are in them.

We live in a day when God has told us that the love of men will wax cold; a day when men will hate one another unreservedly, much like the end of the Nephite nation. I think we are seeing this today in these two moods. Isn’t it curious that the innocent are condemned to die in abortion, and the guilty are allowed to go free as men try to eliminate capital punishment? This is just exactly the opposite of what God would have; but the opposite because men’s minds are damaged, are stultified by the power of the adversary. The force that principally aids and abets both of these causes in the world is priestcraft: men setting themselves up for a light to the world for praise and gain.

What should be done about these problems? The key to these problems is not in the problems themselves. The point that I am trying to make tonight is that it doesn’t do much good to go out and fight abortion or capital punishment. The place where we can be most effective in bringing about good is in helping men to change their minds. It is their thinking; it is their understanding of the universe that gets them to espouse causes that we can see are evil. The best way to help the world is to convert men to Christ, to help them to come unto him and let Him form the concepts of their minds and set the standards and establish the values. The key to this and every other is the message of salvation — it is to help men to repent. To repent means to change one’s mind.

It is our great opportunity to take upon ourselves the mind of Christ. We do this not all at once but line upon line, precept upon precepts answer by answer as we seek the mind and will of the Lord through His Holy Spirit. Each of us as members of the Church is commanded to receive the Holy Spirit. If we do receive it and profit from it and are obedient, the Lord will fill our minds with His truth. We will see and know.

I have dwelt somewhat on negative things. I hope that won’t be what you remember. I hope the thing that you will remember from what I say is that there is a positive side. There is an alternative to abortion, living the gospel of Jesus Christ. There is an alternative to abolishing capital punishment, namely a recognition of justice through God’s will. We can recognize that man lives eternally, and that it just might be that the greatest favor that can be possibly done for that man is to allow him to have his blood shed that he might satisfy the demands of justice and be better off in eternity. But that is not for us to decide. God has set the policy. It is for us to live our lives and do good as we can under Christ. It is a terrible thing to take the life of another man. But he who thinks nothing of taking the life of another in murder, nevertheless, has an opportunity to do something about that sin by having his own life taken.

It is my hope and prayer that we as Latter-day Saints will be a force for the work of Christ in this world; for the work of goodness and righteousness. As the Adversary spreads his mists of darkness and false doctrine abroad among us, that we might not be taken in by the world; that we might not succumb to the propaganda; that we might tread a steady course, straight along the path of righteousness.

I don’t think it pays to go out into the world and shout these things. I say these things rather plainly and rather bluntly to you tonight because I presume that you are servants of Christ. If you are not a member of the Church, I don’t expect that you will even understand what I say, much less accept it. If you are a member of the Church, I would expect that you will be enlightened by the Spirit and thus will come to a position in which you can be a servant of Christ, edifying and blessing those around you.

My only hope is that each of us will do that. I hope that each of us will search our souls to rid ourselves of the selfishness, of the lust that keeps us from doing what we know is right, that we might serve Christ. Our opportunities to build a kingdom where righteousness prevails, where there is justice but also mercy, the justice and mercy of God, not our pretended justice and mercy. I hope for the day when He will reign whose right it is to reign — the only one who knows enough to establish righteousness and justice and truth. I bear witness of Him that He is our only hope, that He lives, that He is a reality, that we can come to Him and know of Him and be of Him. I pray that each of us might know this. I bear this testimony in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.

Posted in Priestcraft, Restored Gospel | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A Matter of Life and Death

Thy Constant Companion

The Instructor Volume 105 Issue 12 December 1970

This article first appeared in The Instructor December 1970

Let thy bowels … be full of charity toward all men, and to the household of faith, and lt virtue garnish thy thoughts unceasingly; then shall thy confidence wax strong in the presence of God; and … the Holy Ghost shall be …

“THY CONSTANT COMPANION”

Doctrine & Covenants 121:45-46
The Instructor, December, 1970

by Chauncey D. Riddle

Chauncey C. Riddle received his Ph.D. in Philosophy at Columbia University and now serves as dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University. A member of the Sharon (Utah) Stake high council, he is married to Bertha Allred. The couple have two children and are members of the Orem 16th Ward.

This article discusses some practical points on enjoying the constant companionship of the Holy Spirit. It has its focus in the area of religion — the discipline of living the gospel — more than in theology, which is theory or understanding of the gospel. The points here reviewed are the personal conclusions of the writer, who hopes that each reader will enjoy comparing notes with him on this vital topic. In this article the Holy Ghost is referred to as a personage and the Holy Spirit as his influence.

Recognize the Holy Spirit’s Voice

1. The first and foremost problem of spirituality is to recognize the influence of the Holy Ghost. One key to this recognition is the knowledge that for some person, the voice of the Holy Spirit is their own conscience bringing word to them from the Savior. President David O. McKay said:

When that word comes to you — call it conscience, or, if you are in the Church and doing your duty, the whisperings of the Spirit, because you are entitled to be a partaker of it — then be true to that whispering, and some day you will know for yourself that you are in harmony with the universe. (Conference Report, April, 1963, page 95)

The “honest in heart” are those who are able to admit what the Holy Ghost tells them in their own consciences.

Manifestations of the Holy Spirit through one’s conscience have two ordinary forms. One is the feeling of the rightness or wrongness of something we plan to do. The feeling of rightness is the burning in the bosom; this “burning” may be faint, but it is plainly warm and positive, assuring us of the correctness of our decision. If we have chosen wrongly. a feeling of sullen sadness warns us that we will be sorry if we proceed.

Another manifestation of the Spirit is that of hearing actual words. We do not really “hear.” for this voice of conscience makes no noise, but we are enlightened with plain ideas, sometimes occurring as pictures, other times as sentences or words. Usually the burning will accompany these pictures or words.

A third most important manifestation is the peace brought to us by the Comforter. When we receive insight through revelation from the Holy spirit, plus the burning in the bosom, and are then obedient to the Lord, we receive that great blessing of peace, of knowing, that we are doing what is right and are “in harmony with the universe,” as President McKay said. This is real living. In fact, it is the beginning of eternal life.

A Demanding Discipline

The Constant Companion appeared in the December 1970 issue of The Instructor

The Constant Companion appeared in the December 1970 issue of The Instructor – page 454

2. It is important to know that living by the Spirit of God involves much labor in thinking, and that learning to live this way completely is as demanding a discipline as any human being can undertake. We must not suppose that the Lord always gives people ready-made answers to their prayers. Rather, he expects us to examine, explore, and attempt to resolve the issue ourselves. We should pray, of course, for his guidance in this process. Prayerful meditation should be most important part of our daily routine and lives, equal in importance to carrying out the Father’s will when we finally know it. When we reach a conclusion, we must not automatically suppose that our conclusion is correct, but must then present our idea to the Lord for his seal of correctness, according to the pattern which he gave to Oliver Cowdery:

Behold, you have not understood; you have supposed that I would give it unto you, when you took no thought save it was to ask me.

But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right.

But if it be not right you shall have no such feelings, but you shall have a stupor of thought that shall cause you to forget the things which is wrong; therefore, you cannot write that which is sacred save it be given you from me. (Doctrine & Covenants 9:7-9.)

The Lord will not always require that we search out the answer to a problem at length. Sometimes he will give us the answer even while we are asking him about the problem. But as a kind and all-knowing Father, he knows our needs and abilities and tries to help us grow in ability to think and understand whenever possible.

The Constant Companion appeared in the December 1970 issue of The Instructor - page 455

The Constant Companion appeared in the December 1970 issue of The Instructor – page 454 & 455

This is Our Pattern

We must remember that in this life, no matter how much good practice at thinking the Father gives us, we will never be able to make righteous decisions without his help. Even the Savior, who was already a God during his earthly ministry, never did anything nor said anything save that which his Father commanded him. This must be our pattern too.

3. There is a definite relationship between spirituality and pleasure. When we partake of pleasures of the flesh or of the mind as part of keeping the Lord’s commandments and of filling our assigned missions in the world, spirituality is heightened, increased; but when we indulge in pleasures merely because our bodies or our minds crave them, we cut ourselves off from spirituality. Alma counseled his son Shiblon as follows:

… See that ye bridle all your passions, that ye may be filled with love. (Alma 38:12.)

The bridle on our pleasures and passions is supposed to be the Holy Spirit. If we accept that bridle, we will have forsaken selfishness. Then God can fill our hearts with the pure love of Christ.

This is why living the Word of Wisdom is such a full aspect of living the gospel. To break the Word of Wisdom is to yield to the craving of the flesh. That yielding keeps us from growing spiritually, which means we cannot do great works of righteousness. The work of a saint, of the latter-days or otherwise, is to serve God by working the works of righteousness under divine direction.

Satan is Ever Ready

4. Great care must be taken, when we try to be spiritual, that we do not let ourselves be influenced by evil spirits. Satan is ever ready to give people spiritual manifestations, but he never will lead us to do a righteous act. Generally speaking, Satan’s promptings are permissive. They are whisperings to us that it is all right to get angry or to indulge our cravings or to break or “bend” the commandments of God or the standards of the Church.

The following are safeguards to prevent our being misled by Satan:

a. Keep in touch and in tune with those who preside in the priesthood. If we cannot fully support them and abide by their counsel, we are in trouble spiritually.

b. Stay within the bonds of our own stewardship. Reject supposed revelations which relate to matters which are the priesthood responsibility of someone else.

c. Know the scriptures. Satan cannot easily deceive us if we know the programs of the Church, what the presiding brethren say in general conferences, and the standard works, If we have not done our homework, Satan can easily slip us a lie.

Spirituality Begins With Small Issues

5. What happens when we pray and pray, but do not get an answer? Try a simple experiment in such a case. Stop asking the Lord what you want to know about; instead ask him what he would have you be concerned about and what he should have you do at the moment. Frequently we pray about the wrong problems and therefore do not receive answers. Spirituality begins with small issues and decisions related to the tasks at hand in our daily lives. If we can be faithful in these small matters, we gain the spiritual strength and obedience necessary to be able to enjoy receiving answers to the larger problems of life.

What a joy to trust in the Lord, to stay ourselves upon the Holy One of Israel, to receive counsel and instructions from the only wise and true God! May we be true, as He is, that Zion might be established in the tops of the mountains, that righteousness and truth might sweep the earth as a flood, that we might prepare a New Jerusalem, worthy of our Master. 

Posted in The Instructor | Tagged , | Comments Off on Thy Constant Companion

Last Lecture

July 15, 1970

Dr. Chauncey C. Riddle

Chauncey C. Riddle, professor of philosophy at BYU, currently serves as dean of the Brigham Young University Graduate School.

Dr. Riddle joined the BYU faculty in 1953. previous to his appointment as dean, he served as chairman of the Department of Graduate Studies in Religious Education, He was named Professor of the Year in 1962, and in 1967 he received the Karl G. Maeser Award for Teaching Excellence.

A native of Salt lake City, he received his Bachelor of Science degree from BYU in 1947, the Master of Arts degree from Columbia University in 1951, and the Doctor of Philosophy degree from Columbia University in 1958.

A devoted Church worker, Dr. Riddle presently serves as a member of the Sharon Stake High Council; he is a former bishop of three wards.

When one approaches such an opportunity as this, it’s a temptation to want to give a grand bombast. But perhaps more realistically, a few simple observations and conclusions which I have come to in my life and experience would be what I would like to leave with you today.

First of all, I would like to make a remark or two about education. This is the business in which we are all principally engaged. I think it important to know that education is a do-it-yourself program. Education is not something that someone else can give to you. In my own experience I think one of the great things which has happened to me was suddenly to realize that if I was ever to know anything for sure and to be very good at it, I would have to assume the responsibility for that myself. I couldn’t leave it up to any professor or any schedule or curriculum or university but would have to seize upon it and do something about it.

Another thing that I came to (and unfortunately rather lately) is the realization that in education the most important thing is not acquiring facts and ideas, but it is acquiring the tools whereby to create and judge facts and ideas. In other words, tools are really the essence of a genuine education. And I mean by tools, first of all a mastery of one’s mother tongue. This is, of course, the absolute indispensable; unfortunately, it is not particularly prized in our society today. I think that is one reason for much of the fuzzy thinking we see going on.

Next I would put foreign languages. Of all the languages I have studied, l find that the Latin that I took in high school has been by far the most pervasively valuable. Next to that I would put my little smattering of Greek, and then German and French. I found that the better I know these tools, the more I am able to use them. We hear people say once in a while “Well, I studied languages for my Ph.D. and have never used them since.” I think that most unfortunate. I think people must be hiding from opportunities when they say that; because opportunities abound and to be able to use language tools is a great benefit.

But after all is said and done about education and tools, I take the standpoint that whatever a man says then, having used his tools and having thought about the world and about his discipline and about life, must be taken as his testimony — his reaction to the world. I wish somehow we could drop the indicative mood from the English language. To be very blunt about it, I think that that indicative mood is presumptive of the powers and prerogatives of deity. If somehow we could speak in the subjunctive we would be much more humble and much more careful as to what we say. If we would say, “It seems to me” or “If it were such and such,” then I think we would be speaking more honestly, relative to our own knowledge. When any man speaks, even in the field of his expertise, he is sharing his conviction. It would be very unlikely that he is really describing the universe the way it is. He may be approximating the way it is, but to take any man’s word as final on any topic at any time and any place, I think is disastrous for an educated person. I think a person should take what a learned man says as something worth listening to, but not to be believed. He should not believe anything until he has come to a conviction of it through his own investigation and resources.

Well now, on to philosophy. Having spent a few years in philosophy, I have discovered that at any one point in time my ideas are not the same as at other points in past history. I would like to share with you some of my conclusions. I don’t suppose I will believe all of these next year. And so don’t you believe any of them. But I hope you find some stimulus for your own thought in what I have to say about philosophy, because the things that I say have come to me in a rather forceful way and I don’t say them lightly. I say them in the subjunctive, “This is as it were,” “This is my frame of reference.”

One of the interesting things about the word “philosophy” is the shift in the meaning of the sophia part. Originally sophia in the Greek meant “practical ability to do something.” In later times as philosophy became a discipline of its own, the sophia came to mean “discourse.” And I suppose this is why philosophy has gained a bad name and the epithet of sophistry has become rather widespread. But I think that the original route is more meaningful.

I take it that the business of philosophy is to prepare a man to do something in his life, not just to talk about it. People who can talk glibly are a dime a dozen in the world, but the people who can solve problems and really accomplish something are rare. I like to think that philosophy really is a preparation for life and for doing rather than just to be able to debate and discourse. Not that debating and discourse are not good in and of themselves but they are surely not enough. A person should achieve what Socrates would call the “examined life”–a life that is structured by thought that is deliberate, that is grounded in something more than fantasy. This is the real business of philosophy. And this always is a personal thing.

Achievement is not a public objective enterprise; it is something that is private. Philosophy ultimately will prepare a person to think through his own mind and ideas and to live a life in accordance with these ideas. Now thinking is a rather specialized enterprise. The idea of thinking scares a lot of people. It’s amazing the trauma that is associated with certain kinds of thinking. Mathematics has acquired a bad name because of the poor way it’s taught most of the time. I notice that in teaching logic, when one gets any- where near the mathematical aspects, blinds come down in people’s minds and fear arises to shut out any further learning. So much fear attaches to all the thinking processes; but it should not. Thinking is a rather simple thing. If studied without fear, it can be mastered rather readily.

There are a few basic thinking processes that one ought to know. One ought to be aware, for instance that though it is good to have a rational structure in our minds, we need to be consistent in what we think and believe that there is no such thing as being a rational person. The old idea of man being a rational animal is one of the great myths. Human beings are not rational, that is to say, out of the deductive reasoning process man does not fashion a life. Reasoning is after the fact in life. Man rationalizes. Man is a rationalizing animal. What happens basically is that people decide what they want to do, and then they think up good reasons for doing it. This is not to demean man to say this; it is just to describe the nature of the way he actually thinks. If you haven’t hitherto known this fact, you might simply contemplate that reasoning depends upon premises. Premises themselves cannot depend upon reasoning. The premises come from non-rational sources; therefore, reasoning itself is based in a non-rational faith. Whatever we assume as premises–the basis of our thought–is the governor of our thought. We can never be rational about that. That is something we simply pull out of thin air in accordance with out desires, our prejudices, our feelings, We need to be very explicit about that fact and not pretend that somehow I am rational and somebody else is not. That’s a bit of hypocrisy; that does not become a learned man.

Another thing to know about language, logic, and thinking is the very peculiar fact that truth or the existence of the universe is always very particular and very specific. But when we think about the universe, we have a very difficult time thinking about the specifics; and therefore, we generalize. Our language consists of class names, and classes are always generalizations. If you will notice when we speak of our language being true, the more general our language is, the more chance it has of being true. The more specific it is, the less chance is has of being true. But then on the other hand, truth itself, the existence of the universe is extremely specific. We have, there- fore, this strange phenomena of people trying to speak truly about the universe in which they must speak most generally to speak most truly, and yet, truth itself is most specific.

Herein lies many of the problems that philosophers get into. For example, suppose that there are no words for red in the English language; only words for the discriminable particular shades of red and every time you mention the color of something, you must use one of these shades. Now there are thousands of discriminable shades (I don’t know how many there are of red). But if you used a particular shade name every time you wanted to mention a particular object in tho universe, you would probably get the wrong one every time because of the difference in light circumstances. You might get one close to it, but you would speak wrongly every time you used a color name. That is why when we wish to speak truly we speak very generally. But truth is specific.

Another important thing to know about language is that our knowledge of the world is based largely on induction. Induction is always guesswork. We have a very wonderful, complicated system of statistics that we study in the world. Statistics is the attempt to make induction good instead of bad. But the interesting thing about it is that no matter how skillful we are about our deductions and our statistics, it all comes back to the fact that we are jumping from the part to the whole. We are guessing. There is no way of certifying this guess by induction. You hear talk about probability in statistics. Probability is merely a second-order induction. It’s an induction on inductions which is guesswork upon guesswork. While we can do better guessing rather than poor guessing, it’s still guesswork. We need to remember that when we describe the world, by making general conclusions about the world, we are guessing. And therefore we must always be ready to admit a fault in our generalizations.

Going on to epistemology. Epistemology is basic. Probably the most fundamental thing to know about any human being is why he believes what he believes. If you can find out where he gets his premises, what the source of his evidence is, you’ve got an understanding of that person. And there are some important things to know about epistemology. It’s important to know for one thing that wherever a man gets his evidence or his premises about the world, he must have preconceptions. Descartes tried desperately to eliminate all pre-conceptions from his mind and get back to his fundamentals. His is a classic case. But it is impossible. He had to assume something. He assumed that he had thought. He didn’t mention the other premise that he assumed, namely that thinking things exist, which enabled him to conclude that he existed. But nevertheless, you have to start with some premises. It is so important to realize that the premises that we adopt always control our inquiry. There is no such thing as starting off with a blank slate in this world, of pretending to be “objective.” We always start with premises, with preconceptions; these control inquiry.

It is important to note that there is no such thing as being strictly empirical. We like to think sometimes that we’re going to the world and being hard and cold about the facts that are there, but we aren’t. There’s no such thing as a hard, cold fact. They don’t exist in the universe. The things we call hard, cold facts are very carefully marshaled bits of evidence which are fully interpreted in the light of prejudices and preconceptions. Hard, cold facts have a way of changing and flipping. It just doesn’t pay to be dogmatic and say “Let’s just go to the evidence.” The evidence frequently is a matter of rationalization. We must pick and choose evidence in this world. It’s impossible to take all of it; and as we begin to pick and choose, we’re not going to the evidence, we’re going to our evidence. And our evidence almost always is what we want to believe. That doesn’t make us very happy, perhaps, but nevertheless, if that’s the way it is we’d better face the nature of the beast.

The world we live in then, the world we think we know, the world we describe when we speak of it as accurately as we can, is a world of construct. It’s a world of imagination something that exists within our minds. There is probably a universe out there somewhere, but the world we live in is within our own skulls. It’s a function of our own imagination. We create it. We invent it. We live in it. We fashion it. Sometimes we’re willing to take account of the things out in the world to change our construct. But all of us have the problem that we cannot afford to believe what our senses tell us. You see our senses are not objective. They are very perspectival. They do not give us the universe as it really is. When you look at railroad tracks and see them converge in the distance your mind must reassure you that they do not actually converge. You cannot afford to believe the way it looks. We must know that the real universe is somehow different from the way it appears. But on the other hand, is what we construct it to be in our minds the truth of the Universe? With proper humility we have to say no. Each of us constructs a universe and then lives in that hoping that somehow there is a sufficient correspondence between our constructed universe and that which actually exists.

Now that which actually exists of course is the domain of metaphysics. And this is again crucial to our thinking–to the way we live our lives. But our metaphysics depends upon our epistemology. How we get our answers deter-mines what we believe about the universe. You hear a lot of noise in metaphysics about idealism and materialism. Many people in the world claim to be materialists–the Marxists for instance, and many of our humanist friends claim to be materialists–their world is material and they base their ideas on evidence; objective evidence about the physical world. The problem with that is that when you examine so-called materialists, when you go into their thinking and ask them what the metaphysical basis of the world really is, you find that what they are telling you is a platonic ideal. I personally have never met a philosopher who claimed he was a materialist who wasn’t an idealist. In other words, the material world he claims to believe in is actually an ideal.

My test for telling whether a person is a genuine materialist or not is simply to ask him if he knows what the universe is. If he says, “No,” he has a chance of being a materialist. I say that simply, because you see, we are so constructed as human beings that our consciousness is within our bodies. We don’t see out through our bodies. What we see is apparently something that is cast on some kind of a screen on the back of our brain. We don’t see in our eyes. We don’t touch in our fingers. We don’t hear in our ears. All these sensations take place in the back of the head; therefore, we never see the world.

We never have any direct contact with that part of the reality of the universe. The “outside world” is a function of the sensory mechanisms of this body plus our imagination. For instance, we don’t visually observe a third dimension in any way, and yet you think you see one, don’t you, as you look at me. You think you see depth. But that’s something that is pure imagination. There is no vision about depth at all, because the eye is a two dimensional surface. It doesn’t project depth at all. There are cues to depth, but the eye projects only two dimensions; and therefore, when we think of the third, it’s strictly imagination. Would that we could know how much more of the universe we think that we directly perceive is also imagination. You see this is one of the tricks of life to figure out how much you’re imagining and how comes through sense. We’ll probably never find out. The one thing we do know is that we don’t see the universe directly; and therefore anybody who pretends to know the truth of the universe is not a materialist. He is assuming that his ideas are the universe, and therefore he is an idealist.

One of the problems in metaphysics is the question concerning how many kinds of things there are in the universe. The popular conception today is monism, the supposition that there is only one basic kind of substance in the universe. I personally find monism to be a rather terrible philosophy, terrible simply because of its many unhappy consequences. People who are monists go around decrying and belaboring the fact that they can’t find any meaningful freedom in the universe. The peculiar thing is that you believe in a monism, if you believe there is only one kind of substance and one kind of law operating in the universe, you cannot have a meaningful concept of freedom. Determinism must govern all pervasively and effectively. That’s a real fatalism. And that’s what people are trapped into if they are consistent monists.

So people who are born and bred in our modern society believing in the scientific approach they’re given to the universe almost always are monists. And it’s not surprising that they grow up believing in monism. In jurisprudence it is thus commonly held that people don’t really have any agency; and therefore, there’s no point in punishing a criminal. You see, what traps them, what keeps them from being free is their preconceptions–their metaphysics. I find that a dualism, or better 3ùet, a pluralism is a better way to conceive the universe. I can’t find any basis for genuine freedom for human beings short of at least three basic kinds of things in the universe. So I’m a pluralist. And using this system of thought, I can make some very meaningful distinctions. The monist might say to me, “But of course that’s your presumption.” Then I simply say back to him, “But monism is only your presumption.” There is no possible way to demonstrate either monism or pluralism. A person believes what he believes about metaphysics simply because he wants to. And the sooner we all find that out and acknowledge it, perhaps we will stop burning people at the stake for their beliefs. I find this a terrible thing to think that human beings could be so ignorant of their own knowledge processes that they would think to take another man’s life because he doesn’t believe like they do. And yet, you see, the inquisition is not dead. We have a social inquisition that goes on in very much the same way in our society today, if you would care to search it out, which has an exact parallel to the inquisition of the sixteenth century.

Going on to ethics. Usually when people talk about ethics they talk about various kinds of goods and so forth. I’d like to just jump over all of that and point out a few things that I think are crucial and fundamental. First of all, when people talk about what good for man really is, they usually make the mistake of assuming that all men are identical. This is a metaphysical assumption. It goes along with monism. But I find it impossible to believe that every human being that I know is cast in exactly the same mold and that ultimately the only differences are differences of particularity of environment. I just can’t find that to be a meaningful way of thinking about human beings. To me, I find that “the good,” that pleases a man, is something quite personal. I don’t believe there is an absolute good in the universe. I think it’s entirely relative and personal to the individual involved. We can’t say what is good for someone else. It is up to every individual to find for himself what is good for himself. I think that one of the great obligations of being an intelligent creature is to cut through all the acculturation we receive in our education and our environment and find out for ourselves what we really like.

But then at the same time I think we need to recognize that good and right are two very different creatures. Usually they are not distinguished. Most philosophers confuse them. The scriptures usually do not differentiate them, but they are two separate questions. I take it that when we have freedom we can do what seemeth to us good, so to speak. But that doesn’t mean we’re right in doing it. I take right to be what we ought to do. It’s a truism that every man will do what is good to him. Ultimately, when he becomes free, he will choose that which pleases him most. You don’t have to worry people doing what’s good, everybody does that. Everybody does his own good. But you see, the real question in ethics is what is right. What “ought” a man to do. Is there any “ought”? I think there is an “ought.” And I think the “ought” is supplied within us. I think the “ought” comes when a person says, “What is my concern in this universe?” If my concern is only my personal pleasure then the only “ought” that I can muster is the “ought” of pleasure.

But on the other hand if I see a genuine concern for other people I take it this is the basic meaning of the word “right”. Right is a social thing. And that the social relations that should govern us so that we can all find our own good or our own happiness is what makes the “right.” This is an objective thing. I think this is absolute. I think it is something that a person must wrestle with if he wishes to have any concern for others, he must come to grips with the fact that when he starts trying to help someone else that is not a subjective thing. He must do what actually helps that other person, And that becomes objective, that becomes universal, that becomes absolute.

So I think that we cannot hide behind the fact that good is relative and pretend that all things are relative. They are not, some are relative and some are absolute.

Going on to religion, I define religion as the way a person orders his life. In the latin relago. It is analogous that every man has a religion. And the religion is simply the pattern by which he lives. Not every man has a church, but every man has a religion. I find it paradoxical that I can hardly find anybody whose professed religion is the same as his actual religion. Most people tell you they believe in one thing and they’ll do quite another. It’s like Chrysler Corporation got into this box a few years ago they went and asked everyone what they would like if they had the ideal car. So people described the ideal car, it was an economy vehicle, no trim on it just the absolute transportation. So they produced it, nobody bought it, because what people really wanted was a plush car with the trim. And that’s what they bought. You see, we are very much that way about religion. We think we believe one thing, we go to great pains to give certain theological answers, but then go out and act entirely as if those answers didn’t exist. As I say, the rarest thing I know among human beings is a being whose professed religion and his actual religion are the same thing. I take it that is one thing philosophy can help a person to achieve. To help him think through what he is doing in connection with what he says and thinks he believes to see if they are all consistent. But that’s a rare bird.

Consistent with this is the idea that every man has a god. The word god is a contraction of the word good. A person’s god is simply his good. There is something in every person’s life which is a greatest good to him. And that’s his god. Again I find it amazing to see how few people who claim that Jesus Christ is their god actually have him as their good. It seldom happens. I think there are a lot of people who would like to. But you see, that’s what I guess the business of repentance is. It’s getting our mind shaped around to where we are consistent. Where we don’t say one thing and profess another.

The word `repentance’ in the Greek is metanoya which means “change your mind.” I find it very enlightening to construe repentance that way. Getting our thinking straightened out is probably the biggest challenge we have in this life. And to think consistently; to get our religion, our god, our goods all lined up and going the same direction; that’s a great achievement.

One problem in the religion that always bothers people is the problem of evil. And I find that I have a conclusion on that subject which not very many people share. My conclusion is with Liebnitz: that this is the best of all possible worlds. I wish we had time to go into this into some detail, because I think that this, when you understand it, becomes a delightful concept. I mean to say by that the universe as we know it, the world we live in today, is the best is could possibly be. Now knowing what you know of the world. I think you’ll find that hard to swallow. I hope you won’t swallow it, of course. But I think you’ll find it hard even to understand that a rational creature could say such. Or a rationalizing creature, pardon me. But nevertheless, I find this to be a deliberate conclusion. To put it very briefly, I happen to believe in a God who is all powerful, and who is good, and who has this world completely in control. If there were any way it could be better, I am convinced he would change it to be that. And since he doesn’t, since he has ordained it to be the way it is, I am convinced that this world is the best of all possible worlds for us. Now I think it will have to change, the world changes from moment to moment in accordance with your actions and my actions. But I think that from moment to moment, especially when you and I do what we know we ought to do, the world continues to be from moment to moment what it ought to be. It is the perfect place for what it is designed to be. Namely, a place to try men’s souls. To purify them, to prepare them. And I find that I cannot fault the Lord in any way, he has done a marvelous job in constructing this world. I am not very happy with many of the things that are going on in it, but nevertheless as I stop and contemplate it philosophically, I have to acknowledge these things that I see happening (and I say this both out of the particulars of my own suffering and the suffering I see others engaged in) I have to admit that God is good. He is achieving marvelous things with all this evil and this suffering that is going on in the world.

A word about science. The basic problem that most people are concerned about in connection with science is the conflict between science and religion. Many people will say there is no conflict, I find myself that there is a vast difference between science and at least LDS religion. I sure there are some religions that are indistinguishable from science. But between LDS religions and science I find a vast difference. However the conflict arises only when one insists upon making science a religion. It’s quite possible to do that. But I don’t find it necessary to make science our religion to be a scientist or to be scientific. We can be perfectly scientific without giving it our ultimate allegiance. Without making “it” that chimerical, mythical “it” (there is really no such thing as science, you know) that is merely an idea in our minds. There are lots of particulars in the world that we catch under this rubric, but there is no such thing as the rubric itself. When a person makes science his god, or his good, I think somehow he is in spiritually trouble (obviously) but intellectual trouble as well. Because he may not be aware what science really is as an enterprise. But that’s where the conflict comes.

A person must declare his allegiance; he must give his allegiance in our church either to the gospel, or to something else. And I find many in our church who give their allegiance to science. And then for them there does become a very definite conflict, they cannot stomach many of the things that go on in the church. Which is the beginning of their departure.

I find there is little true science around. Science is the business, I take it, of reorganizing concepts of the world in order to think of the world more effectively and more economically. Technology, on the other hand, is taking concepts which have been thus formulated and adjusting the world in accordance with them. As I look at science books, I find almost no science in them. They’re almost 100 percent technology. I believe that is one reason why America has never excelled in science. We excel in technology because we teach technology. European institutions do a much better job of teaching scientific thinking; and that’s why most of the great discoveries have come out of European institutions.

Dipping into politics for just a moment; I have a bad time in politics because every time I listen to liberals, I know I’m not one of them. Every time I listen to conservatives, I know I’m not one of them, And both of them think I’m the other. Those labels don’t mean an awful lot. To be very blunt about it and frank with you my own political persuasion is that I’m a revolutionary. I am utterly disgusted with this world the way it is. And I am bound and determined to do something about it. The force of my life and strength is to be spent in changing it. But I’m a little different from most revolutionaries. The battleground for my revolution is within my own breast. I find it a terrible species of temerity for people to launch revolutions to try to force other men to conform to their ideas when they haven’t got themselves straightened out. For some reason I can’t find any sympathy with people who want to go out and burn and shout and force other people. I think that’s a very non- intelligent kind of revolution. I think that if I will put my own heart and mind in shape, then perhaps I can be an asset to this universe. Until then, I’d better stick to home and get the work done. If I ever should become an asset to this universe, then I think I could through persuasion show other people and maybe help them, not by any force, but simply by persuasion, a way that we could better our society and circumstances. To me that is the true revolution.

To go back to what I said about good and right, I think you can do good using force, but never what’s right. Right is always a thing that needs freedom and persuasion. The integrity of the individual must be preserved, or right cannot be involved. And those who would force good upon the world ultimately are simply denying the integrity of the individual.

I think you probably observe in all that I have said that though I have been talking about philosophy, my thoughts have never been far from the gospel. I would find it personally a terrible travesty to have it any other way because I happen to know the gospel is true. For me. I can’t claim it to be true for anyone else, but I know it’s true for me. I know that as my thinking gets better and better, speaking of it in relation to its internal consistency, speaking of it in relation to the evidence I have from the world, that the more my thinking grows and gets better the more it approximates the gospel. What I know from the scriptures and from listening to the brethren. My own propensities force me to bring everything I think professionally in terms with what I know in the gospel. I cannot have two pockets. They must be consistent. My life must be a whole. And so of necessity I continually compare my own thinking and philosophy with what I learn in the gospel, and I find the two complement each other beautifully. They enhance one another. But I must be careful to put one as ultimate, namely that the things of the gospel are ultimate.

Now, one of the problems that bothers a lot of the people in the Church is the fact that we don’t have unity on what we believe. I find this not too disturbing. I can get along very well with a man who disagrees with me as long as he will work beside me in the kingdom, I find it important that we disagree simply for the reason that I know that I haven’t arrived yet and I don’t think he has arrived yet. If we can’t disagree and change our minds, neither of us will come to the truth eventually. The ability to err is also the ability to repent. I’m grateful for the fact that the brethren give us a lot of latitude in this Church to think false doctrine. Where they are strict is on what we do and I think that is just the way it ought to be. If we work together in the Church, if we ever get the priesthood harness on, I think we will come more and more to a unity of the faith. We will come to see eye to eye. I think there will come a day when people will believe exactly the same. That’s the day they become Christ-like. They will have the same opinions on politics and food and recreation. This doesn’t mean they will lose their individuality completely, but they will come to see eye to eye on all things. And I hold this as a great and wonderful goal. But in the meantime, I’m not at all disturbed that we don’t have that. The unity that I think we ought to be concerned about is the unity of our action and support of the brethren in moving forward the work of the kingdom.

Well, as I come to conclude now, I suppose that something I have said has been disagreeable to you. I hope so, because that means you have been thinking for yourself. You could not have had all the experiences I have had in my life, and therefore if you come to my conclusions it’s perhaps unfortunate. You ought to come to the conclusions that your life brings you to. I hope that we will deal with each other in ways that pay more attention to what we do rather than what we say. What a man does is really the measure of what he believes and thinks, not what he says. I hope we all will do good things. I hope we will put our minds and lives in order, some of us think we are so great, let’s see what we can do with it. What kind of happiness we can bring into this world through the struggle that we have to purify and correct ourselves.

Finally, I come down to this point. The only thing that I am sure about in this world that I can really anchor my thought and mind and hope to is Jesus Christ. I know his voice as he speaks to me through the Spirit. And I find that to be most precious. And I would encourage everyone who has a hope in any of the things that the gospel promises to try to come unto the Savior and to live knowing something of his Spirit. That is living. The Spirit is sweet, I don’t know about you, bu I can taste it. It tastes sweet and it is most delightful. I know of nothing more satisfying than to know that I am in accord with him who speaks to me through the Spirit. I’ve never seen him. I hope someday that my faith can be pure enough that I can. But I know that he is good, he is light, he is truth, because of the progress that he has enabled me to make.

And one further thing that I have come to see so clearly in my own life. Namely, that sanity and righteousness are identical and that sin and insanity are identical. I’m not talking about people with organic disturbances that can’t think, but I’m talking about those of us who can think. I’m convinced that when we sin knowingly it is simply because we cannot accept the truth. We are insane. It’s no mistake that Satan is the Father of lies and that the Savior is the truth. He is the truth and the light. He is clarity. He is reality. Satan is an inconsistent deceiver.

In all these things I would simply like to leave you with my testimony. I know the gospel of Jesus Christ is true. I am most grateful for that. And I’m grateful for the chance to associate with you and to say these few words. And I bear my testimony in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

Posted in Ethics, Metaphysics, Philosophy | Comments Off on Last Lecture

The Pillars of Testimony

AN ADDRESS GIVEN TO THE BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY STUDENT BODY

DR. CHAUNCEY C. RIDDLE
Dean of the Graduate School
June 30, 1970 – Devotional

with an introduction by
Dr. Dean A. Peterson
Dean of the Summer School

DR. DEAN A. PETERSON

It is our privilege this morning to have as our devotional speaker, Dr. Chauncey C. Riddle, dean of the Graduate School and professor of philosophy. Dean Riddle was named Professor of the Year in 1962 and BYU Honors Professor of the Year in 1967. He also received the Karl G. Maeser Award for Teaching Excellence.

He received his bachelor of science degree from Brigham Young University and his master’s degree and Ph.D. from Columbia University. He is a member of Phi Kappa Phi Honorary Scholastic Society and the American Plains Division of the American Philosophical Society. Since 1965 he has been a member of the high council in the Sharon Stake and has served on high councils since 1958. He is a former bishop of three wards: Provo Eighth Hard, Provo Nineteenth Ward, and the BYU Second Ward.

Chauncey Riddle is a native of Salt Lake City and is married to the former Bertha Alfred. They are the parents of twelve children, ten of whom are living, and their twelfth child, a son, was born this past Sunday. We congratulate Dr. and Sister Riddle. It is now our pleasure to turn the time to Dr. Riddle.

DR. CHAUNCEY C. RIDDLE

Several years ago I was descending the main stairs of the Butler Library at Columbia University in New York City when a fellow student stopped me. He asked if it was true that I had graduated from Brigham Young University. Upon receiving my affirmative reply, he volunteered that he was a graduate of one of our neighboring institutions. But the thing that so delighted him about his university, he went on to explain, was that he had been “liberated.” I took the bait and innocently asked him from what he had been liberated. Then the roof fell in. For the next two hours, as we stood there on the stairs, he explained to me all of the terrible evils of the Mormon Church. He began quite calmly to explain these evils, but as time progressed his explanations became a tirade punctuated by invectives and blasphemies. His face became beet red; his fury was so great that he began to jump up and down in sort of a war dance. l wondered if he would leap upon me to vent his obviously full spleen.

He told how he had once been a “good little Mormon boy.” He had attended all of his meetings faithfully, graduated from Primary, bad become a deacon, teacher, and priest in due order. He was well read in Church literature — was so well informed about doctrine that he was asked to teach a class in one of the auxiliaries of the Church during his freshman year at the university. Then he began to take classes in philosophy.

His professors of philosophy had carefully explained to him the delights of being “an intellectual.” As an intellectual he was given to understand that religion is all subjective, and therefore completely unworthy of any thinking man’s allegiance. They convinced him that the General Authorities of the Church had no such thing as revelation from God since there is no personal God. These authorities, they said, were simply paranoid and had a variety of illusions of grandeur. They were power mad, according to his professors.

Shades of Korihor 

My fellow student, of course, wasn’t just quoting his professors. He believed fully in what he was telling me. He went on to explain how the Church was really a system for making money and emphasized how shameful it was that all those Mormons out there in Utah were being slavishly led around by the nose. His attack included the Book of Mormon in particular, which he claimed was gibberish, and the Bible, which to him was a collection of myths and bedtime stories. One by one he decried the major doctrines of the Church showing how, to him, each was ridiculous when compared with modern science.

At first l attempted to counter his statements. As he launched upon the Brethren or certain doctrines, I would point out inconsistencies and untruths in what he was saying. These replies only made him the more angry, and soon I perceived that his attack was completely emotional and not intellectual.

On only one point could we agree. l challenged him with the idea that he had taken this apostate stand because he couldn’t live the standards of the Church. He then vehemently affirmed that such was not the case, that he saw real value in the Word of Wisdom and in the moral standards of the Church. He claimed that he had never broken these standards and never would, for he saw a utilitarian value in these things quite apart from the gospel.

The conclusion to his long outburst was that he intended to get his Ph.D. and then spend the rest of his days bringing light and cheer to Mormons of guilty conscience in order to smash the Church and its authorities wherever and whenever he could. Shades of Korihor!

By the time we parted, l was somewhat numb, drenched with his vituperation, and frustrated too, for I had been unable to help him. l wondered how on earth anyone could help him. l especially wondered how he would fare in New York City in keeping true to the moral standards he claimed he would never violate. My wonder ceased after a few months. The last time I saw him was in a dimly lit corner of a campus restaurant. He was reclining in a booth, obviously drunk, surrounded by empty beer cans, with a cigarette in one hand, and the other hand on a girl whose appearance told the rest of the story.

A Real Testimony       

Oh, sad, sad story! I cannot think back on him without wanting to weep. That this could happen to the youth of the noble birthright is appalling. But it did happen and it does happen. And it happens again and again for the same reason. That reason is the lack of a real testimony.

A testimony is that precious gift that enables a person to have enduring faith in These then are the components of testimony. First, an ability to hear the voice of the Lord when he guides us to righteousness; this we called recognition of spiritual experience. Second, knowledge of the work and the ways of God; this we might cull understanding. Third, having in our lives that most precious fruit of the gospel, the quiet inner peace that passeth understanding.

The Parable of the Sower        

The Savior gives us a graphic illustration of these three elements in the parable of the sower. He tells us what would happen if we were to lack any one of these elements.

A sower went out to sow his seed.. and as he sowed, some fell by the way side; and it was trodden down, and the fowls of the air devoured it. (Luke 8:5.)

The Savior explained this as follows:

The seed is the word of God.

Those by the way side are they that hear; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved. (Luke 8:11-12.)

These people of the beaten path are those of the world who are so trodden down by the influences of the world that they do not recognize the word of the Lord when it comes to them. When the word of the Lord comes to any man, it is carried by the Holy Spirit into his heart. But perhaps that man pays little attention to his heart, priding himself on being objective in responding only to “hard, cold physical evidence” which affects his body and which he can demonstrate publicly to others. If so, the precious things in his heart lie undiscriminated, unsorted as time passes, it is easy for the adversary to snatch the precious word of the Lord from his memory. So, for want of attention and honest recognition of admitted worth, the word of the Lord is lost from consciousness and the opportunity to have a testimony and to be saved is gone.

Returning to the Savior’s parable, we see the second error.

And some [seed] fell upon a rock; and as soon as it was sprung up. it withered away, because it locked moisture. (Luke 8.6)

This is interpreted by the Savior as follows:

They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away. (Luke 8:13.)

These are persons who are able to recognize and treasure the word of the Lord. They begin to keep his commandments; yet they do not understand his work. In the face of temptation they wither because they cannot see the purpose and necessity of being different from the world, of keeping themselves pure and unspotted. Lacking the perspective of eternity, they fall easy prey to the desires of the moment, and the joy of the word of the Lord is overwhelmed by the lusts of the flesh. Had they searched in the scriptures and listened carefully to their priesthood leaders, they would have caught the point of sacrifice and they would have had the hope of the rewards of righteousness. This would have nourished their souls in the hot glare of temptation. But lacking root, not understanding what they were doing, they withered.

The third problem is represented in the teaching of our Savior as follows:

And some [seed] fell among thorns: and the thorns sprang up with it, and choked it.

And that which fell among thorns are they, which, when they have heard, go forth and are choked with cares and rich’s and pleasures of this life, and bring no fruit to perfection. (Luke 8:7, 14.)

This is the problem of what it is that satisfies us. Some persons hear the gospel message but are quite content with the world the way it is. They busy themselves with making and preserving their wealth and in living deliciously; they see no reason for a change. This is the problem of the upper economic classes of society especially. The Book of Mormon speaks of them being comforted with carnal security and thus being carefully led away down to hell. If they are ill, they have the best doctors; if they are hungry, they command the finest cuisine; if they are lonely they throw a party; if they are depressed or nervous, they are soothed by drugs, tobacco, alcohol, or whatever suits their fancy. They fancy, of course, that they do not need a Savior. Whatever they need, they can get — they think. These persons seldom gain testimonies until their health and wealth are taken from them. Bereaved of the temporal salvation they have so ignorantly enjoyed, they begin to glimpse the fact that there might be something better to life than just sating the flesh.

The Gospel Produces Good Fruit   

Undoubtedly there are some persons who do not have the fruits of the gospel in their lives simply because of not knowing what they are missing. My neighbor has a nectarine tree. He enjoyed its abundant fruit each year until he tasted one of the nectarines on my tree. Now his taste terrible, and he has grafted in many twigs from my tree hoping to convert his into a tree that produces good fruit.

Producing good fruit is the point of the gospel. If we live the gospel, our lives produce love, kindness, charity; we produce righteousness. Righteousness is caring more to see others happy than worrying about our own happiness. This is one of the paradoxes of the gospel. The only way to be really happy is to forget about our own happiness and to labor diligently for the happiness of others. The Savior said:

“He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it. (Matthew 10:39.)”

Pillars of Testimony    

Above all, our God is a god of righteousness. Whatever we do for his sake, we do in the cause of righteousness. And, among those who have tasted of the fruits of righteousness which have come through obedience to Christ, there are those who desire this fruit above all else. It is even more important than life itself to them. These are they who have strong, secure testimonies of the gospel, of the Savior. They know the gospel is true because when they heard the word of the Lord they had a spiritual quickening. Through this spiritual experience, they gained insight into the work of the Lord, the work of righteousness. And, when through faith they acted in obedience to that understanding, they tasted the precious fruit of the tree of life and knew of God’s goodness and love. Then they were founded on the rock. Then they had an anchor for their souls. These are they of whom the Savior said:

And other [seed) fell upon good ground and sprang up, and bear fruit an hundredfold.

But that on the good ground are they, which in an honest and good heart, having heard the word, keep it, and bring forth fruit with patience. (Luke 8:8, 15.)

Testimonies and Righteousness     

One plain and very important conclusion we may draw from the Savior’s parable is that testimonies are not for everyone. There will come a day when every knee shall bow and every tongue confess, but today only those who have honest and good hearts can be sure of gaining a testimony, and they gain one because they love righteousness. That love of righteousness leads them to the Savior, because only in and through him are they able to bring forth true fruits of righteousness. He is the way, the truth, and the life.

We have seen in the example of the Savior’s parable of the sower what happens when we leave out one of the necessary elements in gaining a testimony. Let us observe the consequence of trying to depend upon only one of these elements.

Spiritual Imitations        

Rather frequently there are manifest in our society persons who claim to be spiritual. They have had some unusual experience which has caused them to embark on a crusade or to alter their way of life. With all seeming sincerity they claim to have discovered the truth, which supposed truth they pursue with great zeal. When we see this claim to spiritual manifestation and its attendant zeal, we ought to check carefully for the other two aspects of true testimony. First, does this spirituality this person claims to have bring him understanding? Does it ring true in comparison with What the scriptures tell us? Is it consistent with the advice and counsel of the authorities of the Church? Secondly, does it bring forth in that person’s life the works and fruits of righteousness: love, kindness, joy, peace?

The Savior has given us a measure by which to judge those who claim to be spiritual. “By their fruits ye shall know them.” (Matthew 7:20.) It takes very little experience to separate good fruits from bad fruits if we are doing careful thinking. The reason for bad fruits and for being very wary of those who claim special spiritual experience is that Satan produces his own revelation or experience abundantly in the world. Many, many of those who think they have found the Lord have simply lent an ear to Satan. Undoubtedly, only those who are honest and good in heart can detect all spurious revelation, that is to say, revelation not from God.

Detecting Spurious Revelation

But there are rational means for detecting spurious revelation. Recognizing that a rational formula is no substitute for long experience in any field, we might note the following marks which are associated with people who have had false revelation.

  1. Indiscriminate recounting of the spiritual experience. (The Savior told us not to cast our pearls.)
  2. Insisting that others accept this spiritual experience. (In the Lord’s system each person depends on his own personal revelation.)
  3. Inconsistency of the supposed revelation with scripture and with the words of the living prophets. (The Lord has told us that his house is a house of order.)
  4. Fruits of unhappiness, contention, hate, confusion. (For the Lord’s way is light, truth, simplicity and unity.)

There is no shortage of revelation in this world. The problem is to tell that which is true revelation, given of the Lord, from that which is spurious revelation, given of the adversary.

Knowing or Living                            

Let’s turn now to an examination of what happens when a person attempts to base his testimony solely on a knowledge or understanding of the gospel. We occasionally see a person who has read all the books and has accumulated a tremendous store of catechistic answers to questions about religious matters. When challenged on a point, the person uses the method of proof-texting; that is, he produces scriptures and quotations which purportedly substantiate his opinion. This person is in the tradition of the scribes and Pharisees whom the Savior so roundly scored because they delighted in knowing the words about the work of God rather than in living by the word of God.

Many times this person who has only great knowledge has correct answers. He will quote scripture and propound the words of the prophets at great length. His problem is that it all comes from his head and not from his heart. It is sometimes said that this person has an intellectual testimony, which is to say, he is fascinated by the rational unity and consistency of the gospel and the scriptures. But this fascination is not a true testimony. It is only an intellectual game which the person is playing. Anyone who is said to be “intellectually” converted to the Church is not founded on the rock. Soon some other intellectual game will fascinate him more and he will be as zealous and catechistic about it as he was about the gospel. Or perhaps the Brethren will ordain certain of the seventy to be high priests, or they might put five counselors in the First Presidency, or perhaps they might even do away with one or more of the auxiliaries of the Church. These persons are then offended because the work of a former president of the Church is being countermanded. They see this as an inconsistency, and their intellectual house of cards is toppled. They forget that the original instruction was given spiritually, by revelation; that the change is given spiritually, by revelation; and that a member of the Church can appropriately sustain either or both only by means of his own personal revelation.

But the person who glories only in knowing about the kingdom of God does not enjoy personal revelation from the Lord. And because he does not live the gospel, which he cannot do without personal revelation, he does not have the special fruits of the Spirit in his life. He will not and cannot endure in the kingdom unless he repents and adds these missing dimensions to his life.

And Signs There Are      

Turning now to the third possibility, we see the case of the person who settles for the fruits only, who has no spirituality nor depth of understanding in his life. This is the person who depends upon signs. And signs there are. Signs follow those who believe in Christ. Signs also follow those who knowingly or unknowingly serve Satan. The signs of these two masters are not always the same, but they are not always different. Thus a person who depends on signs alone has no true idea as to what or who might be the cause of the signs on which he depends.

It is not unusual to see in the Church a person who believes the Church is true because he was there when Aunt Annie was administered to by the priesthood and was miraculously healed. He saw them lay on hands; he saw Aunt Annie healed. Is that not proof enough? It is for him. Building his house on the sand, he proceeds as if he had a testimony. But then Aunt Annie becomes ill again. She is administered to again, but this time she passes on. Everyone is grief stricken at losing beloved Aunt Annie. But our friend who based his testimony on her healing is not only grief stricken, he is terrified. He thinks that maybe the gospel is not true; perhaps there is no God; perhaps life is just a monstrous joke of nature. Because be has not accepted into his life the comforts and guidance of the spirit of the Lord, be does not and cannot know why Aunt Annie was restored on the one occasion and released on the other. He does not have the understanding of the gospel to know that death is not a curse but a blessing to the righteous. Bereaved of moorings, our friend is swept with the tide of skepticism and despair now despising the sandy foundation which once supported his unstable house of testimony.

Testimony and Faith     

It has been obvious through this discussion that testimony and faith are very closely associated in the gospel of Jesus Christ. What we have here called testimony is very close to what Paul talks about when he discusses faith in the book of Hebrews. The formula we have given sounds very much like Alma’s description of how to gain faith. The connection is that testimony is the necessary prerequisite to sustained faith. Testimony is the basis, the foundation for acting on faith. A testimony is knowing that the gospel is true. Knowing that, one can then exercise great faith.

To exercise faith in Jesus Christ, one must hear the words of Christ. These come to us in the still, small voice of his spirit. If we then believe and obey the Savior, we are showing forth faith in him. But a person cannot go very far acting on faith, not far enough to save his soul, without knowing that the course he is pursuing is the will of God. Without that knowledge it is too risky and expensive to act on faith. The sacrifices demanded are too great. A sandy foundation will not support them. But when we have tried our God and know that he is just and true and righteous, then we can exercise faith in him, unto death if necessary, because we have a testimony.

On the other hand, one may have a testimony and not continue to act in faith. This is the terrible route that apostates of every dispensation have taken. Having known the goodness of the Lord, they chose to stand apart, to forsake the ways of righteousness and to return to the world and to sin. A testimony never impels a person to be righteous; it only enables him so to act. The devils all have testimonies of Christ. They know him and know who he is, but they deliberately choose the way of sin because their hearts are not honest and good.

The scriptures plainly reveal to us that testimony and faith must grow together before either is strong or of great value. The beginning point is always personal revelation for the Lord always takes the first step by extending the arms of mercy towards a man. The man must desire to believe and hope to find righteousness enough to try the Lord, to try the experiment of obeying him and his cords. If a man obeys the Lord, he receives a reward, a spiritual reward. This reward shows him that it is good to obey God. Thus, as a man adds obedience to spirituality, understanding to obedience, and recognizes the result, he has a testimony. As he is further obedient, he gains more understanding and more rewards which increase his testimony. As his testimony grows, he can stand greater and greater spiritual manifestations. As he obeys the instructions from the Lord given in these revelations, his faith becomes greater and greater. Thus these two, faith and testimony, grow together as the saving grace of our Savior until that person has overcome the world.

Perhaps you have watched concrete being poured. In any job that is intended to be strong and lasting, reinforcing steel is placed at strategic intervals. This steel makes the concrete almost indestructible. It may crack and the surface may chip, but the mass remains solid and steadfast. If you have watched somebody trying to destroy reinforced concrete, you know that the simplest thing to do usually is just to pick up the whole mass and cart it off.

Concrete is like faith. A testimony is like reinforcing steel. Satan is the destroyer trying to smash your faith. If you are full of reinforcing steel, Satan cannot smash you. He would like to take you up bodily and cast you away. But our Savior does not give him that power. So Satan hunts for faith without testimony, for good acts, obedient acts, where the person is not sure whom he is obeying, why he is obeying, and if it is worthwhile to obey. When he finds such a person, he puts the pressure on. Not necessarily a great massive pressure – just enough to chip off a corner. And then another corner. Here a piece, there a piece, the person is destroyed all the while trying to do what is right. Trying but not succeeding – because of only half trying. Trying to live the gospel without searching the things of the spirit, without pondering the meaning of the Lord’s message, without keenly observing the fruits of the Spirit. To try to have faith without a testimony is to be thoughtless. But to think, to search, to obey, to experiment, to find that rock upon which to build, that is thinking, the best kind of thinking; it is called repentance. And that kind of thinking is real living; in fact, it is the beginning of eternal life.

Testimony Bearing        

A word about the bearing of testimony. In one sense a testimony is a wholly private thing. It is something you know; it is part of your life, your conscience, your experience, but you cannot show it to anyone else because it is part of your inner life and experience, your spiritual life. That, of course, is why it is so valuable to you. It is your personal comfort and warrant for your faith. No matter what happens to anyone else, you have something you know for sure about spiritual matters. You and the Lord have a functioning, ongoing relationship and companionship.

The privacy of your testimony is another witness to your personal free agency. Because it is private, other persons cannot judge you nor assist you in your thinking. You must think through the evidence for yourself. It is your own personal evidence. Others may check your reasoning, but they cannot check either your data or your desires. So you remain free of men because of your privacy, and free from the flesh because these data are spiritual. This is the freedom which the gospel offers to all who seek the truth.

But though your testimony is private, the Lord does nt always want you to keep hidden the fact tat you have one. Under his guidance you are to bear your testimony. When he prompts you, he wants you to express to others the fact that you have one, as Paul says, to give account to men of the hope that is within you. You can never give another person your testimony, or even a testimony. But there are times when you must stand up to be counted.

For when you bear your testimony, you declare yourself to be on the side of the Savior. You express to men that you have tried the Lord and found him to be good, and you stand as a personal witness to that truth. As you speak, truly the Holy Ghost is your companion. He, the Holy Ghost, also bears his witness to the souls of your bearers. He is a God; his witness is divine. His witness is the beginning of spiritual life, the basis of testimony, the opportunity for faith. While your witness is nothing so grand and mighty as that of the Holy Ghost, nevertheless your witness is the occasion and opportunity for his witness. Thus you are an important and even indispensable part of the Savior’s plan to save mankind. If no man bore true witness of God, the occasions for revelation from God would be so sharply diminished as to throw the world into another black night of apostasy. So we are sent into the world to be witnesses of the light. We are not the light. But we know him and bear testimony of him; he is Jesus Christ.

There is also a responsibility upon those who receive a testimony, a witness of Christ. Like it or not, they must judge. When a man declares himself to be of Christ all of his hearers who claim to be servants of Christ also must react. If a man bears a true witness and his hearers who are members of the Church accept it, the speaker and bearers strengthen one another and draw closer to each other in the bonds of fellowship and unity that characterize the perfected kingdom of God. But if these members reject a true witness, they have opted in behalf of Satan. If a man bears a false witness and members of the Church accept it as true, they have likewise declared themselves against the Savior and for Satan. If members reject a false witness, then they know to labor with this man as an unbeliever. If they try not to accept or reject, then they are pretending that the occasion is unimportant. But a testimony of Christ is never unimportant; it is a matter of spiritual life or death for both hearers and bearers. When we attend sacrament meeting and especially testimony meeting we are all accountable. We add or detract from the meeting and we will have to answer for what we do. Sometimes it is fashionable for people to express boredom with a testimony meeting. But, for those who have and understand testimonies, a testimony is always a spiritual feast, a rich opportunity for discernment, an occasion to know how to act toward our brothers and sisters.

Many times a point is made of the fact that we bear testimony in our deeds as well as in our words. And indeed we do. Whenever we who are covenant servants of Christ make a decision or perform a deed, we are bearing our testimony. If we seek and yield to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, we declare ourselves to be servants of Christ. Whenever we avoid him or act contrary to what we know to be right, we are plainly bearing witness to ourselves and to any who see our acts that we do not really believe in Christ. We are saying that though he may exist and he may be all right in his place he is not good enough to be worshipped with all of our heart, might, mind, and strength. And thus do we reject him.

But thank the Lord for those few stalwart souls sprinkled through our midst who unpretentiously and steadily opt for the Savior. They can discern the Spirit of the Lord and they love it. They understand the gospel and have their eye on eternity, whose name is Jesus. They bear the fruits of faith in their lives, for they strengthen the weak knees, they lift up the hands that hang down. They build the kingdom of God day and night, summer and winter, by showing forth in purity of life the love of God towards men.

In conclusion, may l give you my witness. l testify with all my heart and soul that I know that the gospel of Jesus Christ is true. I know because I have tried it. I know that it works. I know that the Holy Ghost is a sweet and a pure companion that leads to righteousness. I know that the gospel is profound, consistent. I know that to learn about the mysteries is a great and overwhelming blessing even though we may not speak of them. I know that God reigns in power in his priesthood, for I have seen lives change under the ordinances of the gospel and I have seen miracles performed. I witness to you that the authorities of the Church are men of God. They have his power; they have his authority; they are filled with his love; and they are working tirelessly to bring salvation to us and to all men. Above all I know that our God is god of righteousness and truth. I give glory to the name of our Savior, and I witness unto you that I know him to be true, to be good. And I know that all that I know that is good and true and virtuous I know though him.

I pray that each of us may inventory his testimony, and then do whatever is necessary that we will never falter in our faith. I pray that we might love the Lord enough to become pure in heart, to establish Zion. That we might show forth the glory, honor, and majesty, and righteousness of the true and living God, I pray in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen

Posted in Devotional, Faith, Restored Gospel, Testimony | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Pillars of Testimony

The Gospel of Jesus Christ

CHAUNCEY C. RIDDLE

PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF THE GOSPEL AS PORTRAYED BY DR. CHAUNCEY RIDDLE, CHAIRMAN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY PROFESSOR AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY.

AN ADDRESS DELIVERED IN A YOUNG MARRIEDS’ FIRESIDE ON A SUNDAY EVENING IN 1968, INCLUDING QUESTIONS ON PRACTICAL LIVING BY CONCERNED LISTENERS AND WELL CONSIDERED REPLIES WHICH HELP TO ELUCIDATE DOCTOR RIDDLE’S PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OF LIFE.
—————————

Brother Skousen asked me to talk about living the Gospel. As far as I’m concerned, that isn’t something you lecture about. I would hope that we could just have a conversation about it. So what I would like to do is just make a few statements, then let us all get into the act, because I think that is where the real fruit would come.

First of all, let me say, I don’t think the Gospel is complex. One of its troubles’ is that it’s disarmingly simple and the historic pattern that has been used for the Gospel is the raising up of the brazen serpent in the wilderness. You remember the Children of Israel were being bitten by poisonous serpents, and apparently the bite was deadly. Moses was commanded to make a brazen serpent and to hold it up before them and they were told to look at it, and if they would look at it, they would be healed and if they would not look, they would die. Well, some 30,000 of them, as I remember, thought that was too foolish, that wouldn’t work, that was too simple. So they refused to look and they died and the ones that bothered to look lived. And this was likened unto the Savior, that whoso would look unto him and partake of him would be saved.

So, in that vein then, I would like to give a quote from President McKay in yesterday’s CHURCH NEWS which I think boils the Gospel down quite nicely. He says this:

“The whole purpose of life is to bring under subjection the animal passions, proclivities and tendencies that we might realize the companionship always of God’s Holy Spirit.”

Now if we have a problem in living the Gospel, it’s simply because we have not been able to bring into subjection our animal passions, proclivities and tendencies. And so, it just boils down to that, and if we take care of that, then we have the companionship of God’s Holy Spirit.

Now that’s important because of what we understand of what the mission of the Holy Spirit is. We might read a verse from Nephi tying that down. Nephi commends to men that they come unto the Savior through the gate, which is, faith in him, repentance, baptism and the receiving of the Holy Ghost, and then he says to them:

“Behold my beloved brethren, I suppose that ye ponder somewhat in your hearts concerning that which ye should do after ye have entered in by the way. But, behold, why do ye ponder these things in your hearts? Do ye not remember that I said unto you that after ye had received the Holy Ghost ye could speak with the tongue of angels? And now, how could ye speak with the tongue of angels save it were by the Holy Ghost? Angels speak by the power of the Holy Ghost: wherefore, they speak the words of Christ.”

Christ is the presiding authority over the Holy Ghost and the Holy Ghost’s mission is to bring the Savior’s words to us. So if we receive the Holy Ghost, then we can speak by the power of Christ. We speak the words of Christ.

“Angels speak by the power of the Holy Ghost, wherefore they speak the words of Christ. Wherefore, I said unto you, feast upon the words of Christ; for behold, the words of Christ will tell you all things what ye should do. Wherefore, now after I have spoken these words, if ye are not brought into the light, but must perish in the dark. For behold, again I say unto you that if ye will enter in by the way; and receive the Holy Ghost, it will show unto you all things what ye should do.”
(2 Nephi 38: 1-5)

This is the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It is to repent of giving in to our animal appetites, passions, and tendencies. To stop that. And to listen to the voice of Christ as it comes to us through the Holy Ghost and to do all things that we are thus commanded. That’s all there is to it. Can anyone remember the Mutual theme of, let’s see, was it the year before last? I guess maybe it was. It comes from section 130 of the Doctrine and Covenants. Do you want to say that louder? “There is a law…” All right, can you quote the whole thing? See what you got into?

“There is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated. And when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated” (D&C 130:20 21).

How many laws is that verse talking about? If you can remember the words in your mind, how many laws is it mentioning? “It says, there is a law.” How many is that? “One.” Just one. There is only one law in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Now lots of people get the idea that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is like having a big computer bank sitting here, and we have a lot of circuitry sets. You know how they work the computer? And the circuitry set would be like a law and when you want a certain blessing, you take the law that’s appropriate and go stick it in the computer and out comes the blessing. You’ve got a big shelf over here of all the thousands of laws you’d want. I think that’s the image some people have of the Gospel, but it doesn’t fit, because in the Gospel of Jesus Christ, there is only one law, and every blessing that comes from God that’s of any eternal significance comes through that one law. What’s the name of the law. Anybody ever heard of it? “The law of Christ?” No, “Obedience, Obedience gets pretty close but it has a very common name, you’ve heard it all your life. The name of the one law from which all blessings come from God is? “The law of the Gospel?” This is the law of the Gospel, but what’s it’s name? “Faith?” No, everybody lives by faith. There isn’t a human being in this world that doesn’t live by faith. What’s the first principle of the Gospel? “Faith?” No, faith isn’t the first principle of the Lord Jesus Christ?” Aha. yes, faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. And what does that mean? Well, that means to receive his commandments as Nephi says here and do what he says, and he will tell us, if we listen, all things that we should do. And if we do all things that we should do, we get all the blessings. If we don’t, we don’t.

So, when you talk about the Gospel, there aren’t a lot of rules, there aren’t a lot of laws but just ONE law, and the thing that our salvation will depend on is simply this. The Lord will say to us, “What did you do, when I told you what to do?” If we say, “Lord, I obeyed your voice every time it came to me,” no problems you see. but if we say, “Lord, I thought I was smarter than you, you were pretty good most of the time but you missed it a few places and so I had to judge you and decide that I was smarter than you and went off on my own a few times, what kind of salvation is there for that person? Well, he has to make his own salvation. He’s his own God, he made his own judgment, his own choices, he wouldn’t rely upon Christ, so he has to furnish his own salvation. That’s fair enough isn’t it?

So it simply comes back to this. When we’re talking about the Gospel of Jesus Christ, it isn’t a matter of living some of the commandments of Christ, it’s a matter of living them all. Living ninety nine percent of the commandments of Christ is not the Gospel of Jesus Christ. A man might be a very good man. He’s pretty smart if he thinks that ninety-nine percent of the Lord’s commandments are good, but he’s not really very smart, otherwise he would know that a hundred percent of them are good.

And so it just comes down to this. It’s a matter of accepting the commandments of Christ that comes to us in the voice of the Holy Spirit 100 percent, and then there is no blessing that will be withheld from us. So that’s the problem of our lives, it’s just a matter of being able to listen to the voice of our conscience 100 percent.

Our conscience is the Holy Ghost. Now that isn’t true for everybody in the world, but for those of us who are members of the Church and trying to do our duty in the Church, the prophets have plainly told us, our conscience is the Holy Ghost. And if you don’t believe it, just try it. Just try doing whatever your conscience says. It’s an amazing thing. You ask anybody what happens if they go against their conscience. Everybody has the same report, what is it? It’s disastrous. What happens when you do what your conscience tells you to do? It’s good. You have a good feeling. You’re rewarded for it. Why, everybody knows that, why on earth aren’t we smart enough to do just that one simple thing of doing what our conscience says?

Well, it’s because there is an adversary. And he keeps whispering in the other ear saying, You don’t have to live all the commandments, after all the Lord wouldn’t be so narrow minded as to demand absolute obedience of you. And so on with various vagaries of false doctrine and enticement, he tries to get us to go against what we full well know we should do. And unfortunately he succeeds a great amount of the time. So again, the problem is to just quit listening to Satan and start listening to the Lord one hundred percent. I’m talking too long. I’m sorry, I’m just about to quit though, if that’s any help.

The question is you see, what is it that controls our mind. Is it the voice of Satan or is it the voice of the Holy Spirit, in other words, Christ? We can lean either way. Both powers are present in our mind. We can lean towards whichever one we want. If we foster Satan, that means that we’re giving in to the flesh and its proclivities, its tendencies, its appetites. That includes the mind. Or, we can listen to the voice of the Spirit. The Spirit isn’t always a voice, it’s sometimes just a feeling of right and wrong, but the longer one lives with this thing, The more black and white it gets as between the spirit of the Lord and the spirit of the adversary. After a few thousand experiments, it isn’t hard to tell at all. Maybe on the first experiment, but after a few thousand, there’s no problem. Then we’re able you see unerringly to live the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

The word “repentance” means, literally translated form the Greek, “change your mind”. Change from listening to Satan and submitting to the flesh, change to listening to the Lord and submitting to his Spirit. So, if we can become as little children and be reborn again, and let him be our Father in all things, then he can perfect us sufficiently that he can put all his blessings upon us. And like Isaiah says, the Gospel is so plain and so simple that “the wayfaring man, THOUGH A FOOL, cannot err therein.”

Well now, maybe that’s enough. Now the interesting thing is, what about the practical applications? You want to talk about that? What practical applications would you like to talk about?

HOSTESS
“I have a problem that bothers me constantly in distinguishing conscience from something else I experience.”

Dr. Riddle
Let me give you a key. There is never a problem at first. It’s always after you start to argue with it that there’s a problem.

HOSTESS
“Let me describe the situation and see if it’s still a problem.”

Dr. Riddle
O.K.

HOSTESS
“I have a hard time distinguishing between the feeling of right and wrong and the feeling I get when I make a choice about what type of food I should eat, or whether or not I should walk across the grass in the quad or..

Dr. Riddle
You mean there is a question about that?

HOSTESS
“Well, there is a question about the real morality of it. I chose normally to walk on the sidewalk but I feel quite guilty when I put one foot on the grass cutting a corner.”

Dr. Riddle
That’s probably good.

HOSTESS
“But there really is no moral problem of whether I put my foot on the grass.”

Dr. Riddle
Now wait a minute, wait a minute. There’s only one sin. It’s disobeying the Lord, as he speaks to us either through his prophets or through his Spirit. and there’s only one act of righteousness, and that’s obeying as he speaks to us through the voice of his Spirit, so you see, this is where we get fouled up, sometimes we get to thinking that well, there certain things which are in and of themselves right or wrong. but there aren’t. Now you can push that. there are some pretty good cases where you would be hard put to say it otherwise. But for almost anything we contact in our daily life, the only way we really know right or wrong is the voice of the Lord. that’s why Nephi had such a rough time when we was told to kill Laban.

HOSTESS
“Then you really advocate following your conscience and if I have a pudding, putting it back and taking a piece of cake instead?”

Dr. Riddle
If that’s what you’re told to do, you had better do it. (Laughter)

HOSTESS
“Well, I know, but this really is serious. The question comes up constantly of whether or not I should obey to take more or hold back…”

Dr. Riddle
The Lord tells us this. President McKay said this about three conferences ago. If you want to be a steward in the Lord’s kingdom, don’t suppose he is going to test you and try you in big stewardships. You wouldn’t do that if you were testing out a steward would you? You’d test him and try him in little things. That is what President McKay says, It’s the little impulses in our daily life that are a testing ground and are a strengthening ground for learning to live by the Spirit. Should you have the cake and not the pudding? That’s your test. Sounds ridiculous to persons who have never had experience with it, but if you’ve ever battled with it, it’s very real. And there is no better way to destroy the Spirit for the next several hours than just not do what you’re told to do. Then you won’t have it, won’t be bothered with it. Right?

HOSTESS
“Sometimes I think it’s almost unbelievable, and I’m continually bucking it…” (laughter).

Dr. Riddle
Yea, yea I know, it is sometimes. I’ve heard many people say, and sometimes I’ve found myself in this position of not daring to pray and ask lest we find out the answer. Now you see, that’s…but that’s our choice, you see Do we want Jesus Christ for our God. We just want a Santa Claus, that’s all we want. We aren’t really hungry for righteousness, because when we get hungry enough for righteousness, we don’t care what the Lord says to do, we’re willing to do it. Right? Yes?

HOSTESS
“I’ve wondered in this, how we grow in learning to live by the Spirit. Now, suppose you have a little child, and we have to tell our little children just what to do and how to live, and you know, socialize them and so on, but then we encourage them to try a little on their own. And we’ll approve it or disapprove it and… Could you comment a little bit on how this works with us. Then do we, throughout our mortal state do we have to still be little children and then after our mortal state we’ll grow up, or do we grow line upon line in this learning to live by the Spirit?”

Dr. Riddle
Well, the first requisite in learning to live by the Spirit is to become a little child, come down in the depths of humility and if we think we are wise and learned in any way, to case these things away and consider ourselves fools before God. Now that’s a stiffer medicine than most people can take, but it’s the plain announced requisite for the system. So, if we’re able to do that, then the Lord begins to guide us. and maybe the first day we try, he’ll only give us one or two instructions. If we keep those one or two, we’re perfect. We’ve done everything he said to do and that’s all that counts. If he doesn’t tell us what to do he can’t blame us. But when he does, we had better jump or we’re in trouble. And then the next day he’ll tell us three things to do, and the next day he’ll tell us four things to do. If we don’t do the fourth thing, the next day he’ll tell us three, and so forth. In other words it ebbs and flows according to our faithfulness and obedience. Now there are few people that I have ever encountered who have anywhere near one-hundred percent companionship with the Holy Spirit, and the plain reason is that I haven’t really met very many people that really want it. Now all of us we get baptized ostensibly announce that we want it, but you see, thinking we want it and actually wanting it may be two different things. So what the Lord does, he gives us a chance to try it, and we go to that point where we are comfortable with it and then we stop. And where we stop, that’s where we damn ourselves. We stop, we damn ourselves, he doesn’t do it. If we’re willing to go all the way, he’s willing to go all they way, but if we won’t go all the way, he can’t go all the way, because he’d be putting something on us we couldn’t stand.

It would make us miserable to have too much blessing for too little faithfulness. I think the first thing parents ought to do when little children can understand is to transfer the implicit faith children have in their parents to the Lord. Little children can understand faith in Jesus Christ and they can pray when they are two. And there is no reason why, by the time they are eight they can’t be passed masters at living by the Spirit. Now most people wait until they get to be about twelve. They don’t really understand by the time they get baptized till they get into trouble and then they start explaining the Gospel to them. Well, my experience is that if you wait until someone’s twelve, you might as well forget it for about ten years, or at least until they get into College, then sometimes they begin to settle down a little bit then, but that period in those early teen age years I don’t think you can do much with them if there’s no foundations there. Now that’s a generalization of course, it doesn’t always follow, it’s just my experience.

HOSTESS
“I would like your opinion on the subject of whether we ever come to the point in this life of thinking like the Holy Ghost. My husband and I have had discussions where we have said, the Holy Ghost will tell you every single move to make. Now my contention was, well, if you live by the Spirit and have done this enough, he will. He will be with you all the time. Now, have you ever got to the point where you think like the Holy Ghost and have grown to the point where you make the decisions and he confirms them?” ….

Dr. Riddle
Who’s our model? Our pattern?

HOSTESS
“Christ.”

Dr. Riddle
What did he say about how he acted? He said “I do nothing except that which my Father has told me to do. I think that answers the question. If it was good enough for him. If we are going to be his servants, it ought to be good enough for us. And he doesn’t say this once; this is pounded home again and again. This is his mission, to do the Father’s will. Now as I understand it, this is the order of eternity. The question is simply this, do we want to do what we want to do, or do we want to do what’s right? Now we have no basis, there is no human basis for knowing what is right to do. We can always know what we want to do apart from right, but we can never know what’s right unless we have the knowledge and power of God.

Well, if we’re willing to accept the knowledge of right from one who has the knowledge and power of a God, then we can do what’s right. And if we don’t want that, we can go our own merry way. But the only way you and I can do anything that is considered good in the eyes of God is to do what’s right, and that is to obey him. We have no power on our own to do any good thing in his eyes. And this can be shown, I mean you can just take what is known about human ability to know and prove that. That’s why the Savior says in John 15, “Except ye are in me ye can do nothing.” Moroni keeps hammering home to us that the Savior is the fountain of all righteousness, not just most of it, all of it, and that except we have his Spirit, we cannot do any good thing. Now that’s pretty plain you see. So the way of the world is not going off and doing terrible things like stealing, and murdering and committing adultery and so forth. the way of the world is simply doing what we want to do, which includes these things, but also everything else. But the way of Christ is straight and simple and narrow. It is simply listening to the voice of his Spirit and then doing it. It’s so simple most people can’t stand it.

HOSTESS
“What about the part in the Doctrine and Covenants where it says study it out for yourself?”

Dr. Riddle
That’s good. The Lord is trying to build us, he’s trying to get us to grow and so he will not usually give us information and direction until we have done all that we can. And as he instructed Oliver Cowdery, so he’s going to deal with us. You must study. it out in your mind, then you must ask me if it be right, you see. There is no supposition that his studying will come to the right answer. He has to determine whether it’s right or not by revelation from God. But nevertheless he has to do all he can. And for my money, and the experience I’ve had, living by the Spirit and searching the mind and will of the Lord in all things is about the most demanding intellectual activity that I have ever heard of. And of course that’s what the Lord wants him to do. He’s trying to create Gods, and that’s a pretty stiff undertaking and the principle thing he needs to make a God is not a person who is very keen as a thinker. The principle thing he needs is a person of sound character. I think that simply means the ability to recognize and follow truth. So lots of the brilliant people in this world will never make it. But those who have the ability, when they know something is right, to stick to it, they’re the ones who will make it. That’s why we go out looking for the honest in heart, not for the sharpies.

HOSTESS
“The real question in my mind is how lazy… it might appear sometimes to be lazy.”

Dr. Riddle
Aha! Just the opposite you have to work hard to live by revelation. The lazy man doesn’t want it, he’d rather do what he feels like doing, which is an animal proclivity.

HOSTESS
“Maybe I don’t get much revelation. I feel lots of times, even though I try to follow… what David was saying about choice. The other day I walked through the Y center and out the North doors walking to the Library, and I got about half way across the patio and thought to myself, ‘Go through the bookstore.’ I thought well that’s… there’s no reason why I should go through the bookstore. And I kept walking and I… ‘Go through the bookstore.’ So I went through the bookstore. (laughter) I wonder how many times a thing like this happens. It happens to me sometimes when I’m driving. I’ll be driving along and say, well I go down this street, so I go down that street. And maybe something would happen if I didn’t go down that street.. I don’t know. But the things like that plus also some of the major decisions I’ve had to make, even though, granted, I may be a wicked man, I really still strive to ask the Lord to guide me and to discern this feeling of right, you know.”

Dr. Riddle
Ahem.

HOSTESS
“And sometimes it is a real struggle, and I think that in my own thinking, sometimes in order to reach this decision, sometimes it seems like I don’t have the Spirit guiding me at least for a period of time such as I would be now. And so this would signify to me, at least in part that the Spirit isn’t always there. Maybe because of my own unrighteousness.”

Dr. Riddle
Well, I’m sure. I certainly have to testify that I don’t always have it, but I always know why I don’t have it now. I can remember what I did that I got rid of it with.

HOSTESS
“But at the particular time, sometimes you are not aware of it.”

Dr. Riddle
If I think back usually it will come to me what it was that I went against. I have the same experience of being told to do funny things so to speak. In fact, I’ve been told to say very peculiar things in front of audiences that people couldn’t understand. How come I said that? Awfully foolish thing to say. But when you know when you have to say, then you have to say it.

HOSTESS
“Well, I’ve had experiences like that. Probably every missionary probably had experiences like that sometime or another.”

Dr. Riddle
Ahem.

HOSTESS
“But I mean, some of these things, we’re told that we always have the… a lot of us don’t realize it in our…”

Dr. Riddle
Oh, I’ll say! It is, and that’s why you see we need to be masters at distinguishing. If you were a musician and you couldn’t quite tell whether you were on pitch or not, you wouldn’t be much of a musician. And so you have to develop that skill. Or if you’re a brick mason and you can’t quite tell whether or not your wall is plumb and square or not, you haven’t learned the trade yet. And after you’ve worked at it for some time, you can tell pretty much just by looking at the thing, you don’t even have to use any instruments. You can tell by looking at it whether it’s square and plumb. You develop that as kind of a sixth sense. Now you see, the same thing is true of the Spirit. It isn’t a matter of all of us being born experts. Saints are, not born. It’s a matter of struggling with the thing until you’ve made enough experiments that you can get very fine discriminations. I don’t know any way to do it except by trying

HOSTESS
“I realize that that’s the ideal way to be but you have to have determination. Like for instance, if I go out through the bookstore a number of times and nothing ever happens, even though I had a real strong feeling I should walk through the bookstore, I think that after a while I wouldn’t walk through the bookstore any more. And maybe there would be sometimes when I should walk through the bookstore. How do you distinguish that? What I’m saying is that I realize the perfect situation to be aware of this revelation from the Lord, but some of it will not be from the Lord and distinguishing meanwhile, until we get to that point when we can discern it as revelation.”

Dr. Riddle
I’ve had that experience, and then only to discover years later, someone come along and told me the rest of the story and discover what it was I steered out of by that. ???? Yea, you just never know. I’ve tried it both ways. I’ve stubbornly gone against that voice when it says ‘Go through the bookstores,’ and I know what happens when you try that.

HOSTESS
“Another example is when I have been driving along the highway and a voice has said to me to get into another lane, presumably because some traffic was just about to come around the corner, and when I did so, I came to the corner and there was no traffic there. So what do you do?”

Dr. Riddle
The best clue I’ve had in solving this problem is the strong sense that has come to me that I must not embark on any day’s activity until I have received my errand from the Lord. And sometimes that takes some doing. I find when I get up in the morning and I work through my plan of the day and get a confirmation of it or correction of it from the Lord, then as I’m busily about his errand, this kind of problem seldom comes up and if it does come up, I find that it’s immediately apparent almost always why I have been given a certain instruction. So I find that it’s just not enough to be always on the defensive, trying to keep from not doing what the Lord says, but to be seeking what he says and to get the instruction.

I got the instruction a week ago today to pay off a mortgage, and it didn’t seem quite intelligent because it was a very low interest rate and I knew I was going to need some money again soon, but there was no question I got it. So Monday I paid it off. Today I found out I have to have the money probably this next week. Now I’m really wondering how the Lord’s going to make this thing come out right. But I have this comforts I’ve tried this thing before, and I know that it always works, he’s never let me down once before, so here we go. And it’s going to be fun to see how it comes out. Maybe a week from now, I’ll know, but I don’t right now. I just… I’m really wondering. But I’m not wondering about the Lord. I’m just wondering how he’s going to pull it off. (laughter)

But I trust him and that’s the greatest comfort that I have ever had in my life. Just the comfort of knowing that having done what I should do, I have got nothing to fear. If I have to take it out again at a higher interest rate, I’m not going to worry because I know he can make up that difference very readily. A few years ago I had an impulse to pay off that same mortgage or put some money on it and I didn’t do it and I lost the money. So, having been burned, once burned twice shy you know.(laughter) And I could have used that money and I can see now looking back in my life, I can go over time and time again: things just like that. So I’m just down to the point where I know for myself, there is only one intelligent thing to do and that’s when you know the Lord’s told you something, do it, and do it just as quickly as you can.

Speed is important. That’s what Peter says. Let’s see, what’s the wording in Second Peter? The english is “diligence.” With all diligence, add to your faith, virtue, it says. Well, the word in the Greek is “prouday”. I don’t know how you pronounce it but anyway it means speed. With all “speed” This is essential. It’s a matter of getting to the Lord early, not late. With all speed add to your faith virtue. What does virtue mean, anybody know Latin? What’s “vir?” Man. So, what’s virtue?. Virtue is manliness or strength. Now we use it in a special narrow sense relative to sexual purity, but it takes strength to stay pure, a real strength and it’s not inappropriate to link those two together. With all speed, add to your faith strength.

And it takes strength to live by the Spirit. That’s the next thing we need. Once you’ve got the Holy Ghost, so you have a little bit of faith, then we’ve got to become strong in living by the spirit so that nothing will shake us off the course. And then he gives the rest of the steps to take. Once you get the strength, there’s another step to take, and once you get that, there’s another one. Pretty soon you’ll wind up with the goal. And the goal is to have charity, or the pure love of Christ, for Christ and for all men. You see, then we’re in good shape, but down here at this faith end we’re just barely beginning to go in through the gate. Did you have another comment?

HOSTESS
“I have trouble with this concept, maybe because of my upbringing, that the Lord will tell you everything you should do, I mean everything.”

Dr. Riddle
All right, he’ll give you your choice. He’ll let you go off and experiment on your own to see if you can improve on the system. I’m just here saying this, because I’ve tried both systems.

HOSTESS
“This is probably something I ought to keep to myself, but… sometimes I’ve had a feeling the Lord was there but haven’t been able to reach him. I can look back and…”

Dr. Riddle
Well, I have to admit that there have been a lot of times in my life when I have prayed for answers and haven’t gotten them, and I’ve found out the reason is this. Many times when I want an answer to a problem, that isn’t what the Lord wants me to worry about. He’s got some other thing he wants me to do now, and if I’ll pay attention to what he says, and go do the thing he wants me to do, eventually he’ll come around to the thing I want. But only after these other things are taken care of. And then I discover that if I had got the answer in the first place, I couldn’t have coped with it because I hadn’t made this preparation. So when I want an answer, the principle thing that I’m concerned about now when I get down on my knees, is Lord, what would you have me do? And if it’s something else, I go do it.

HOSTESS
“Is there a type of evaluation we can make of our lives? I know we’re not all miserable because we don’t follow the promptings of the Spirit, but I don’t know sometimes I think I should be.”

Dr. Riddle
All we have to do is ask ourselves, ‘Are you growing in the gifts of the Spirit.’ If we can say that to ourselves honestly, you see, that’s test. Certain signs follow those that believe, and the signs follow because they have the gifts of the spirit. Can you heal the sick? Can you foretell the future? Can you discern spirit’s? You see, if you can do these things you’re on the road. If you can’t, then that just means that your heritage has yet to be claimed, and if we if we’ll ask ourselves those things, it might get a little embarrassing, but at least we will know where we stand.

The question is, what would we like to be doing? One of the biggest problems we have, you see, is this thing that Lehi saw in the vision. He saw people go up to the tree of life and partake of it, and taste the pure love of God through his Spirit. And then they looked over and saw the people in the big spacious building pointing the finger of scorn at them. They were saying in essence, are you so simple minded as to listen to your conscience? Don’t you have any intelligence of your own? Are you just a puppet? Do you have to be told every move to make? Why don’t you grow up and be a man? Well that gets pretty powerful you see and people begin excluding you from their society, and from their professional areas because you rely on the Spirit. Most people can’t stand that pressure, so they kick it over and start doing it the way the world does. We lose a lot that way. But that’s their choice. If they’d rather have the way of the world and the salvation it can offer as compared to the blessing and gifts of the Lord. They are the ones that have to make the choice. They have to lie in their beds, so let them make it.

HOSTESS
“When you are feeling bad and low spiritually, what’s the best way to purge that out?”

Dr. Riddle
You mean when you’ve got a bad feeling because you’ve done something wrong?

HOSTESS
“Yes, but not anything really bad”. (laughter)

Dr. Riddle
I know what you mean. The thing I’ve found that works is to just go someplace where I can be alone and get down on my knees and just really confess. The Lord says he wants a broken heart and a contrite spirit, he means it. And I know that it works. Whenever we don’t do what he says, it is because our heart is not broken and our spirit is not contrite. And occasionally when I get a little too uppity, the Lord just brings to my mind a few of some of the rather large errors I have committed in the past. And he lets me see that of myself I have nothing. I’ve done things that are sufficiently grievous that without his grace I’d just better die right now. So he’s very kind to me in that kind of reproof. And if I’m willing to take the chastening, well, it’s kind of overwhelming. The sad part of my life is that sometimes it doesn’t last very long. I get uppity again and begin to think that I can counsel the Lord and tell him what to do, and when he says go and do that, I say Lord, couldn’t it be some other way? It would be more convenient if it were this way, and so forth. And he’ll say, yes you can do it that way if you want, go ahead. So I go ahead and it turns out to be disastrous.

HOSTESS
“Sometimes you feel like you get almost too much chastening, more than you can take…”

Dr. Riddle
The problem is keeping it when you get it, isn’t it?

HOSTESS
“But it’s not wise to ask for…”

Dr. Riddle
You don’t have to pray for tribulation, you’ll get plenty of that. (laughter) No. But the Savior’s given us the keys to how to hang on to this thing. If we ever get it and get in the right mood, there is one simple key to hanging on to it. Anybody know what it is? Remember him always. Now we promise to do that twice a Sunday, if we do it, we’d have it made.

HOSTESS
“Tomorrow morning we’re all going to wake up, and the week will come crashing in on our consciousness. There will be a number of things that we are not thinking about now because we are at a high spiritual plane. Now my question is, do. you have some good specific suggestions to help us keep from being weighed down when the cares of the world do come crashing in upon us, and we find ourselves losing our spiritual power almost within hours…?”

Dr. Riddle
Well I find in my own experience, and as I watch others I think it’s true, there is a one to one correlation between sin and fear. When people are afraid of anything it’s because they are not keeping the commandments of Christ. And when we keep the commandments of the Lord, there is nothing to worry about because nothing will happen to us then but what it’s for our good. Now the only reason we get into pickles where we really have to sweat is because we haven’t kept the commandments of Christ.

Sometimes I get into a day when I’ve got meetings and lectures and conferences scheduled right through the day and I just honestly haven’t had time to get ready for them. And it isn’t because I didn’t want to, its just that I couldn’t. And I find that whenever I am in that kind of a box, if I will just go to the Lord and talk it over with him and let him know that I’m trapped, and if he wants this work done it will have to be him that pulls me through. If I’m humble enough, he’ll do it. And I can go to the meeting I’m supposed to conduct that I haven’t prepared for and the agenda will come to my mind, and I give the agenda and away we go and it works. I go to the lecture, and I am able to give it. But if I have been slothful or have let my stomach get control of me and I’ve eaten the wrong things or the wrong time or the wrong place, or if I haven’t gotten up early enough that morning, or something like that. If I’ve let the animal part take over. I go through the day, and just like Coach Watts says, its one of those days when you might just as well stay in bed, everything goes wrong.

But I’ve found too, there is something to that. I’ve found that when I’m in the middle of that kind of a day, it’s really kind of refreshing to have everything so bad. (laughter) Because as the blows reign upon my head, I realize that the Lord is just letting me reap the consequences of my own acts, and if I bear it patiently, it will help me to be humble, and come out again and start over.

That’s the beautiful thing about having a new day every day.

HOSTESS
“How do you start your day?”

Dr. Riddle
A chance to start over, Prayer is the only way I know to start. Prayer and meditation. Have you ever read President McKay’s conference talk on meditation. This was about three conferences ago again. That is a masterpiece. And that’s the basis upon which every spiritual life is built. it’s taking enough time… it’s almost just like charging a battery. You can’t do it in a short time, it takes time to do it. Now you can put a fast charge on sometimes. But you know a fast charge is always dubious.

It takes some time… Sometimes in the work of the university I’ve had situations come up when I had very serious pressures on me, where I’ve been under pressure to do something that’s wrong. And people with considerable power, able to get at me, if I don’t do what they want. And I find that whenever I have a situation like this, if I will just take the time to fast and pray and take it to the Lord and get his counsel, if I pray, the Spirit just kind of wells up and gives me enough strength to go and do the right thing and tell them that they can inflict their punishment on me if they want and I’ll take it. And every time I’ve done that, I’ve never had to take the punishment. The Lord has seen me through it. But if I ever compromise and don’t get his help and don’t do what he says I get set back a year or two in growth and accomplishment.

So, I hope you realize that I’m just telling you what I think. This doesn’t do you a bit of good really, except that it might encourage you to try your own experiments because that is the only way you will ever find out. Nobody can transfer this to anybody else. It doesn’t matter if you sat at the feet of President McKay twenty-four hours a day for a year, he couldn’t transfer it to you, because all he could do is bear his testimony to you and tell you how he is doing it. But this is what preserves our agency, this is why we have integrity as an individual because nobody else can do this for us. Satan cannot control us if we don’t want him to, if we have the Spirit of the Lord, and the Lord will not control us. It is up to us to make the difference, and if we will just work on. it we can. Well, that’s about enough.

HOSTESS
“I would just like you to comment on what you said a little while ago about things coming up in the work of the University which you thought would make you compromise a basic principle. Has it ever been revealed to you through the Spirit that it would be better to go along with the will of the authorities rather than upsetting the boat? According to how you feel, would your principles direct you to do it? In other words, the only reason that… I think of Nephi when he was commanded to kill Laban. Naturally he wouldn’t have done it. The only reason he went against ingrained principles commanded of the Lord was because the Spirit had directed him to do that.”

Dr. Riddle
He knew the Spirit. He knew Christ personally, he had seen him.

HOSTESS
“Right, now when you know by basic principles that you are not supposed to do something, have you ever gone to the Spirit and prayed and meditated about it and somehow found that you were to do it, after you had prayed? You know what I mean?”

Dr. Riddle
Ahem, yes.

HOSTESS
“You have done this?”

Dr. Riddle
Ahem. Not a real compromise of basic principle, but something that looked to others like a compromise of basic principle. That’s the really rough part, when your friends come to you and say to you, How could you do that? The friends you have who are servants of the Lord, they know why you did it. So, that’s the kind of friend you want anyway, so that’s what counts. I’ve never been told to compromise a basic principle in my own life. I’ve been told to do things that were giving on small things to gain large things. And I’ve found that if you’re not able to give on small things, you become so brittle that people can’t work with you. But if you can give on where it’s unimportant, then you can work with people and help them come along.

One thing I discovered when I first became bishop. I thought to myself unrighteously, now we’re really going to set this thing in order. (laughter) And there were two big lessons I learned in a hurry. I changed some programs that were standard program in the Church, and frankly they weren’t very good.. But the thing that I found out was that the Lord didn’t want me fixing it. And it took me a few months before I was back to all the Church programs just as they should be.

Now where the Church hadn’t said, I moved out in some areas, and that was fine. But where specific instruction was given, I found out that you get the help of the Lord for all of your programs only when you do what he says, or what his servants say.

So I learned that one, and I also learned that when you’ve got a Sunday School Superintendent working under, as Bishop, you don’t run the Sunday School. You have to let him exercise his personality, and if he has the kind of personality that makes a certain kind of mistake, as long as you are willing to leave him as the Superintendent, you’ve got to be willing to let that mistake be made, until you can convert him. In other words you have to work with people.

And this is what looks like compromise sometimes you see. But the great thing about the Church is that it provides an opportunity for each of us to become perfected, and the work of administration in the Church is converting those who are immediately under us to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Because if a man is not doing exactly right in his job, it is because he is not living the Gospel. And so the only way to do it is not to go to the Sunday School Superintendent and say, Look, you’re not handling these Sunday School classes and these teachers just right. The thing to do to him, is to go to him and read the scriptures with him and pray with him, and entice him to submit everything he does to the Lord in prayer, and do nothing, except he does it that way.

And then, you see, once that’s accomplished, you never have to worry about him ever after. He’ll do what’s right whether you’re there or not. That’s the beauty of the system, you see. A man becomes self-actualized, self generated, and you can turn him loose Oh what a wonderful feeling it is to have people that are that way that you can trust. You can give them an assignment and you don’t have to worry that they will make foolish mistakes of judgement and sink the system, because they will go out, and they will pray about it and if they get a little off the track, the Spirit will tell them, and they will know it and they will be sorry and they will get back in line. Oh what a great comfort that is to know that the Lord is running the Church and not us.

Well, I don’t know how long you want to go here.

HOSTESS
“Do you have a definition of meditation?”

Dr. Riddle
The difference between praying and meditation is that meditating is waiting for the answer. Lots of people pray and then get up and run and don’t wait for the answer. So, meditating is praying and then weighing things back and forth, thinking, considering, almost as a conversation with the Lord.

And there is one more clue I’d like to give you. When the Lord tells you to do something, if its anything other than an immediate instruction to do something now, if he gives you any general or general insight, write it down. That’s what a book of remembrance is for. It’s a place to treasure the precious things the Lord gives us. That’s why Adam kept a book of remembrance. Genealogy is an incidental to a book of remembrance. But when the Lord give us a jewel, he expects it to put it in a jewel box, not just to stick it in our pocket to be pulled out when we pull out our handkerchief or something. He wants us to take care of it, and it’s so easy to forget the things that the Lord gives us. It’s like the seed that falls on the beaten path, and if we don’t do something with it the birds come and carry it away. Pretty soon we have forgotten that lesson. The next time the Lord isn’t quite as ready to give us that revelation. It’s terrible to have to learn things twice and three times. But if we’ll treasure them, what a great treasure house we can soon have. And what could you pass on to posterity better than these kinds of gems. Nothing you could give them in any other way could equal your testimony and a record of your dealings with the Lord. Can you think of anything else that would even touch it? I can’t. One more.

HOSTESS
“Just for a summary, I get the feeling that as we all listen to you, we feel like ‘Oh we are not on the ball at all,’ you know. We feel like we have a long ways to go to get up to the true path. I know that that is not true. But we feel like we’re sinners, and we’re not doing all that we should do.”

Dr. Riddle
We are all sinners.

HOSTESS
“I mean, that’s true (laughter). The only thing I want you to do, in summary, is to maybe give us a few steps of say,… we’ve already started to do it once… but maybe a few steps to take us from where we are to get back on the path. You mention prayer. Prayer and meditation, could you give us a few specific steps that we could perhaps take to break ourselves down, to humble ourselves so that we can start clean tomorrow morning You know what I mean? A summary in a way to take us from where we are to where you are claiming we should be.”

Dr. Riddle
Yes, I’m talking about ultimates.

“Behold I say that ye must pray always and not faint., that ye must not perform anything unto the Lord, save in the first place ye shall pray unto the Father in the name of Christ, that he will consecrate thy performance unto thee. That thy performance may be for the welfare of thy. soul. That’s one (II Ne 32:9).

Now let’ s try another one. Here is a kind of a good general instruction. Alma to Shiblon:

“See that ye are not lifted up unto pride, see that ye do not boast in your own wisdom, nor of your much strength. Use boldness, but not overbearance; and also see that ye bridle all your passions, that ye may be filled with love; see that ye refrain from idleness (Alma 38:11 12).

“Oh, remember, my son, and learn wisdom in they youth; yea, learn in thy youth to keep the commandments of God. Yea, and cry unto God for all thy support. Let all thy doings be in the Lord, and withersoever thou goest, let it be in the Lord. Yea, let thy thoughts be directed unto the Lord, yea, let the affections of thy heart be placed upon the Lord forever. Counsel with the Lord in all thy doings, and he will direct thee for good. Yea, when thou liest down at night, lie down unto the Lord that he may watch over you in your sleep. And when thou risest in the morning, let they heart be full of thanks unto God. And if ye will do these things, ye shall be lifted up at the last day.” (Alma 37:35-37).

President McKay has said recently, “Make Christ the center of your life.” If he is the center, if we see ourselves as his covenant servants every moment of our life, sleeping or waking, it matters not; if we are thinking of him, conversing with him, praying to him, counseling with him in all things, working mathematics problems with him, buying groceries with him, – it may sound ridiculous, but it isn’t. This is the way of the Lord. I don’t know how to put a summary on it better than to say that just repeat some of these phrases we know so well. We should have our eye single to the glory of God. We should serve him with all of our might, mind, and strength. The world will count us fools, and the worst opposition we will have will come from other members of the Church, other members of our own family. But that’s simply part of the test. We are Christ’s, we are bought with a price, and we cannot do anything else without dishonoring him who has bought us.

Well, Brothers and Sisters, I hope you understand that I am not putting myself above you. If I have made you feel, as this brother has said, that you are sinners. I only intend that I would recognize that I am. I’m talking about the ideal. But I glory in the ideal. It’s beautiful. Not only that, it’s true. And it works, I know that. And I know that you and I are part of a great work.

We’re not here; members of this Church at this time and at this place, simply for our blessing. There are two very important reasons. To raise up righteous children unto the Lord first of all. That’s our most important responsibility in this life. And secondly, to raise up Zion through our work in the Church. Oh what a privilege to be in this. What a privilege to be able to conduct our professions, our civic life, our home life under the tutelage of Jesus Christ. To have his power and his Priesthood in everything we do. Why, there is no more blessed people that have ever lived on the earth than we are, and no people have a greater responsibility than we have.

John the Baptist had a great charge, and there had never lived a greater prophet before him, because his mission was to prepare the way and make the path straight before the second coming of the Savior. And we have exactly the same opportunity: to prepare the way and make the path straight so that the Savior will have a kingdom when he comes. I pray that we might be as faithful as was John, even to the sacrifice of our lives if necessary as he did. That we will stand for the principles of truth. That we will in all humility bear witness, especially through our living each day, that we might be servants of Christ. This indescribable privilege is so pure and so holy. We should recognize that every moment of our lives is a holy opportunity. An opportunity to do the will of Jesus Christ, and thereby to promote real good in this world. The world has so much misery and so much evil in it, so many people languishing in ignorance and squalor and disease, and all because the light of the Gospel doesn’t bless their lives. And what a great chance we have to do something about it. Now the world has many programs to do something about it, but the nominal fact is that they all fail. But the Lord’s program does something about it. It gets at all of the problems in a unified, sufficient way, and that’s how people get their blessings.

The Church is going to become sufficiently a light unto the world that people from all nations will see it, but you and I have some work to do before it gets to that point. I hope we’ll do it. I hope we will be faithful and not ashamed of the crosses of the world, that we might truly keep our covenants and serve the Lord with all of our heart, might, mind, and strength. And I ask this as a prayer in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

Posted in Restored Gospel, Young Marrieds Fireside | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Stewardship

(Talk given by Chauncey C. Riddle at Education Week, 1968.)

Once a person understands the basics of the gospel and decides to embark on a life of service to the Lord, Jesus Christ, that is to say that person has entered in at the straight gate, he/she must go along that narrow way and endure to the end. I believe the next big challenge is to learn to live in the order of the priesthood. This is an almost overwhelming challenge when we begin to contemplate its greatness. As we understand the importance and magnitude of the task, we might comprehend briefly the notion of learning to live in the priesthood order in the doctrine of stewardship, which is our topic for today.

Stewardship is being given a responsibility by someone where we do not have ownership or right to absolute dominion in our own right, but where we receive it as a charge from someone else who does. It is the nature of our existence that we are stewards. For instance, we do not own the bodies that we inhabit. They are given to us as a stewardship — as a charge. We have been loaned them for the purpose of executing the will of the owner; nevertheless, it is given to us to have agency to defy the owner if we will. But then, if that is the case, he will not give us a body in exactly the same form in the resurrection as the one which we have now. We are given our minds as stewardships. The mind we have is a mind somewhat like the mind of God except it is very small; nevertheless, we have intelligence given to us that enables us to think, act, create, rule, and accomplish; also destroy and hurt (the evil things), according to our own will. We are given specific instruction by our Maker as to how to use this mind: what to take into it, what to believe, and on what basis we should make our decisions. The talents we have (whatever they might be), the money we have, the property we have — everything which the world counts as being in our discretionary power — is really not ours. It is only a stewardship from the Lord.

Most of the people of this world, of course, do not believe in this stewardship nor accept it. When people are baptized members of this Church, they accept the Lord as the owner and governor of all things and acknowledge themselves as stewards, they take upon themselves the name of Christ not only to be known by themselves, but as the name of their Master, Jesus Christ. They promise that henceforth they will not do their own will but do His will and keep all the commandments He gives unto them. They promise that from henceforth they will not neglect this stewardship but will remember the Master always, that they might receive His instructions constantly and be faithful and wise stewards in executing their charge.

Let us read a little bit in Section 104 of the Doctrine and Covenants, which further explains this idea. Beginning with verse 11, the Lord says,

“It is wisdom in me; therefore a commandment I give unto you, that ye shall organize yourselves and appoint every man his stewardship; that every man may give an account unto me of the stewardship which is appointed unto him.”

This, or course, is a very necessary and important part of being given a stewardship; namely, that we may be called at any moment to account for that stewardship. If we have served faithfully and well, according to the instructions given by the Master, there will be no regret. If we have been slothful or procrastinated keeping his commandments, if we have been doing our own will instead, then there is considerable reason to fear the presence of the Master. The scripture commends to us that if we keep the commandments of the gospel our countenance shall wax strong in the presence of the Lord, which is simply another way of saying we will be delighted to see His coming anytime and give an account of our stewardship. But if we are not ready to give an account of our stewardship, if we cannot say, Lord, I have faithfully fulfilled thy will in all things, it simply means we have not yet fully applied the gospel in our lives. One of the tests as to whether the gospel is our way of life is if we are ready to go to our Master at any time. Every day is sufficient to its own problems, and if we live each day as the Lord would have us do, there would never be a moment of any day that we would not be ready to make that accounting.

Continuing with verse 13,

“For it is expedient that I, the Lord, should make every man accountable as a steward over earthly blessings, which I have made and prepared for my creatures, I the Lord stretched out the heavens, and built the earth, my very handiwork; and all things therein are mine.”

All things in heaven and earth.

“But it must needs be done in mine own way; and behold this is the way that I the Lord have decreed to provide for my saints, that the poor shall be exalted, in that the rich are made low”

–not by force, but by the doctrine of stewardship.

“For the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare; yea, I have prepared all things, and given unto the children of men to be agents unto themselves.”

We keep hearing that there is a terrible famine imminent, that the world is overpopulated. But these statements are all made by people who know not God. If we understand the nature and the work of God, He has plenty and to spare for each of his children. The only reason there ever has been famine on the earth, or difficulties or troubles among the children of God, is because (1) they have rejected their Maker, (2) they have not been willing to account to Him who is the owner and Master of all things, and (3) they have not been willing to be stewards. Had they been willing there would have been abundance for all.

“Therefore, if any man shall take of the abundance which I have made, and impart not his portion according to the law of my gospel, unto the poor and the needy, he shall, with the wicked, lift up his eyes in hell being in torment.”

Now this particular section relates specifically to the law of consecration practiced in the Church in the early days, but the general principle is also there.

“Let’s read on a little bit in the last part of this section, beginning with verse 54. ”

“And again a commandment I give to you concerning your stewardship which I have appointed unto you. Behold all these properties are mine or else your faith is vain.”

If there is anything we think ye own which does not belong to the Lord, Jesus Christ, it simply means that we do not have faith in Him. He is not our Master, we have not really made a covenant with Him, or, in other words, our faith is vain.

“And ye are found hypocrites, and the covenants which ye have made unto me are broken; and if the properties are mine, then ye are stewards; otherwise ye are no stewards. But verily I say unto you, I have appointed unto you to be stewards over mine house even stewards indeed.”

This is the challenge, to see all things that you have and are as a stewardship from the Lord, Jesus Christ. One of the great blessings of being a steward before Christ is that we are responsible only for the stewardship; we are not responsible for things that lie outside the boundaries. For instance, supposing we think of our stewardship as a plot of ground. We are not responsible for what goes on anywhere in the world except within the limits of that plot which the Lord as designated as our stewardship. If we are faithful in that stewardship, the Lord might give us a supervisory stewardship not only over our plot but over some of our neighbors and over their plots too. It would then be our great opportunity to be in the chain that blesses these stewards; that is to Say, to help them be good stewards in their own areas. So we never have to worry about anything except exactly that which the Lord has designated as the boundary of our responsibility. It is not necessary for us to go out dashing throughout the world solving all the world’s problems. We can1t do it anyway. But we can solve the problems of our own stewardship.

Satan of course, is actively trying to get people to neglect the matters of their own stewardships and go about solving the problems of other people1s steward- ships, because by that means he can thoroughly mess up the works. If we have weaknesses, sometimes we can have difficulty in getting revelation for our own stewardships, but almost always we think we see clearly what our neighbor should do about his. But it is important to realize that if we don1t see clearly what we ought to do about our own problems, it will be because we lack the Spirit of the Lord. Right? And if we lack the Spirit of the Lord for our own stewardship, will the Lord ever give us revelation for our neighbor’s stewardship? Obviously not. If we think we see clearly how to solve our neighbors’ problems, yet we can’t solve our own, who is telling us how to solve our neighbors1 problems? That obviously is Satan, and he delights in doing this. Thus he goes around fouling up the lines of stewardship- – changing the markers so that people won1t know where they belong and will stray out of bounds.

One of the most misinterpreted circumstances in scripture is a classic example of this. This is the story of Cain. Cain killed Abel, and then the Lord came to him and said,

“Where is Abel thy brother?”

and Cain retorted,

“I know not, am I my brother’s keeper?”

Ordinarily the correct answer to Cain’s question would be,

“What? No!”

The truth is Cain was never given to be Abel’s keeper (brother is never a keeper). Nevertheless, by taking Abel’s life, Cain had stepped out of his stewardship and had usurped the stewardship of God Himself. By doing this Cain arrogated to himself the responsibility for Abel’s life. So it was quite appropriate that the Lord should come to ask Cain where Abel was. When Cain tried to get out of it by feigning ignorance of the situation by going back to the standard law that he was not Abel’s keeper, the Lord reminded him that He knew all things:

“Thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.”

Then Cain tried vainly to excuse his usurpation of the Lord’s stewardship.

It is interesting that Satan has used this little story ever since to convince most Christians that they ought to be their brother’s keeper. It was never intended that way. By this technique more damage has been done in the world than by any other device. People take this story as their example and say,

“Well, I need to be my brother’s keeper.”

So they leave their stewardships to start fixing up their brother’s problems not by the revelation of God, but by the revelation of Satan.

Every tyrant since the world began has been his brother’s keeper. He’s been solving problems for his brother that his brother wasn’t allowed to solve for himself. If you look in the history books, almost every ruler who has taken great power for himself has done it under the guise of blessing his brothers who didn’t know how to take care of themselves. He had some special insight and was going to bless and take care of them because they were not wise enough. And 1938 is no different from the time of Napoleon, the time of Caesar, or the time of Cain, who was the first tyrant of them all. It has been the same story ever since the beginning: stepping out of our stewardship and trying to solve another’s problems and fix things. If every man would learn to worry about his own problems and not try to mess up someone else’s life and stewardship, this would greatly free humanity. But we haven’t learned yet. Throughout the world we have continuing attempts by people who think they know better how to enlighten the minds of others.

“QUESTION: What is a keeper?”

I’m glad you brought that question up; that shows I haven’t made my point. What is a keeper? If you lived in the zoo and had a keeper, what would you have? Somebody who fed you, closed the gates on you, and opened the gates when he wanted. He would be your master. A keeper is a master. He is the one who calls the shots, who gives the orders, who says what goes on. It was never given in this world for a one man to be another man’s master. It is given to some to be masters. Now the proper relationship of brother to brother is to live together and to bear one another’s burdens. This is what Alma says: when my brother suffers, I have to go suffer with him; when he rejoices, I should rejoice with him. But I’m not to tell him what to do. I am not to instruct him or to chastise him or tell him where to get off. Now there will be people who will be sent to do that and they will be masters or keepers, but each will have a specifically appointed stewardship to do so given by the Lord Himself. It was never appointed that any brother go around pointing out his brother’s faults. Does this help explain the matter?

“QUESTION: If your brother has an obvious problem, shouldn’t you go talk to him about it and try to help him?”

That’s exactly the temptation I’m talking about. If the Lord won’t give you revelations for your own stewardship, will He for someone else’s stewardship?

“QUESTION: But sometimes we are able to see someone else’s problems more objectively and thus be in a position to help.”

All right, supposing you go to a friend of yours and say, “I’ve got a problem. Will you help me with this?” What are you doing in that circumstance? You are letting them be your keeper temporarily. You are yielding to them-a stewardship to counsel you. And in that circumstance, if they are wise, they might be able to help you a great deal. If someone asks you for help, then indeed it might be perfectly appropriate to give it. But supposing they don’t ask, would you then have the right to give counsel? If you did, you see, you would be overstepping the bounds of your stewardship.

I don’t expect that this is going to sit well in one sixty-minute period- – simply because all of my life I have heard that we are supposed to be our brother’s keeper, until I began thinking about this scripture and found it just didn’t fit. And, as far as I am concerned, there is no justification for it. Who are keepers? Well, fathers and mothers are keepers; bishops, stake presidents, General Authorities, they are keepers. They have specifically appointed responsibilities and authority over the people over whom they preside. But they can’t go outside that stewardship and do any good. If a stake president goes from one stake into another and tries to preside, he does nothing but create havoc. This is how the Lord orders His kingdom.

One of the reasons I’m talking about this is because we need to learn the order of the priesthood. And until we learn the order of the priesthood above us, to respect the stewardship we have below us, and to faithfully execute our duties, we cannot be Zion. It is not enough for us to be a good person individually. We also have to learn to live together in a harmonious arrangement, and the only way this arrangement can be harmonious is if it is a God-ordered arrangement. That’s the purpose of Priesthood and stewardship: that every person will know what his lines of authority are, what his area of responsibility is, and then don’t get all mixed up

by doing things that are not appropriate. The Lord’s kingdom is a kingdom of order and this is the order that we are talking about. Now let’s get down to a lesson that is a little more ticklish.

I suppose that more unhappiness has come out of the problems of stewardship between husbands and wives, even with people who are trying to live the gospel, than from any other thing. I would like to make some suggestions which I hope will be helpful.

Basically, there are three stewardship relationships; we will have one of these with any human being in the world.

  • “We are either their father or their mother, “
  • “we are their brother or their sister, “
  • “or we are their son or their daughter. “

These are the basic interpersonal relationships that exist between people. Can you think of any relationship that does not fit one of these three? Which of these is the husband-wife relationship? Is it a brother-sister relationship? The answer is no. It never was and was never intended to be a brother-sister relationship. What relationship is it? It is a father-daughter relationship. (Long Pause) Now what I am saying is that the husband presides over the wife and the wife does not preside over the husband. The husband’s stewardship includes the wife, but the wife’s does not include the husband; therefore it is a father-daughter relationship in the priesthood. Because this is not understood, a great deal of difficulty arises when people try to relate to each other. If people would listen when they take their temple covenants, they would already know this. But many do not, and, therefore, they do not understand how this relationship works.

Let us talk about the responsibilities and duties of husband and wife in this respect. Anytime we have a father or mother relationship to someone, we preside over them in the authority of the priesthood. Our priesthood responsibility is to bless them. Blessing them means to help them develop and grow as strong, righteous individuals — that is the responsibility of one who presides in the priesthood. It is not to dominate. It is not to govern in the usual sense, but to be a source of information, of strength, of power, of courage. Whatever is needed that the person cannot bring to himself, he should be able to receive from the person over him. And, if he can’t get it from that person, he will have to go higher. God is not slack. God will deliver. We all know that we will get what we need if we go high enough. But, you see, the people in between will lose their blessings if they do not give us what we need. Each of us works out his own salvation in part by learning to be a good steward and in part by administering good things.

Do you remember the scripture that says when the Lord comes in His second coming He finds His stewards giving meet in due season and that his a wise and faithful steward? What does that mean? It simply means this steward is measuring out the blessings and gives to his stewardship what they need, when they need it, as they need it. That is the due season. This is so that they can grow, so they can be nourished spiritually, physically, socially — whatever it takes. The power of God is sufficient for all the needs of human beings, and if we would live under the order of God we would need nothing but the government of God for the perfection of our souls. It would suffice for every need that we have.

So, the role of a husband is to bless his wife, to be a reservoir to her, to be a source of everything she would need that she cannot herself supply to fulfill her stewardship. What is her stewardship? Her stewardship is to be a reservoir, a source, to help her children. It is the role of the wife to bring children into this world, to bear the souls of man, and to teach them and to nurture them. And whatever she needs that she cannot provide herself, she should go to her husband and get it. If her children are sick and she cannot heal them, she should go to her husband and request that his priesthood be invoked to heal these children. If she needs knowledge as to how to handle them in difficult, psychological circumstances, she has the right to go to him and seek counsel as to what she should do. He can fulfill his role only if he is a man of God, only if he is on good enough terms with the Lord that he in turn can go to the Lord and say, “Lord, I need power to give this blessing.” If he is a righteous man, the Lord is not slack. He will give power, and the blessing will be delivered and the mother will be satisfied that her stewardship is in good order. Likewise, children have a right to go to their mother or to their father.

I am not sure I understand exactly how all the relationships fit. I just observe from my own family that the children, when they are very little, are almost completely in the stewardship of the mother, but as they get older they begin to come back into the covenant, shall we say, into the stewardship of the father and the father must take over some direct relationships, especially with the boys. I don’t think that, except in the case of a widow who would then receive special dispensation from the Lord, when the father is living a mother raises up righteous men. It seems to take a man to do that.

“QUESTION: Sister Emma Mcffay, talking to the BYU women, suggested that a man cannot function in the office of his stewardship unless he is encouraged by a good woman. Do you agree?”

I agree. I see no conflict whatsoever. What I am saying is very drastic, so I hope you will try to be sympathetic. I can see that, before we can be perfect ourselves in these relationships, we must become so strong in the power of the Lord in righteousness that we will never need anything from anybody beneath us in our stewardship. If we have needs we always go up the line to be fulfilled. Let me be specific. This is the ideal; there aren’t many people who are this way. We are all working in that direction. I don’t think that a man, when he becomes what he ought to be as a man of God, will ever be in a position of needing the support of his wife. This does not mean he would not enjoy it if he had it, but if she chooses not to support him, not to comfort him, not to sustain him, he can get along without it. He has to be that strong. It can be a great blessing to him to have that comfort, but he must not need it. You see, the Lord is in that relationship to us. The Lord cannot afford to need you and me. If he did, then we would be boss. We would be Lord if He needed us. He is grateful when we are obedient to Him, and when we do the work we are supposed to do we build His kingdom — but he does not need us. If we choose to go our way and defy Him, He can get along quite nicely without us. He may not have as much glory, He may not be as happy, but He will never have to come begging to us for anything. He is not in that position.

Similarly we need to be in that position in the priesthood authority: to delight in receiving from beneath, but never to need it. For instance, have you seen mothers who so desperately needed their children to approve that they would give their children whatever they wanted and thereby destroy their children? But if the mother does not need those children, then she is in a position to do the very best possible job raising them. If the children choose to defy her, she does not have to get on her knees and beg them to be obedient. She then deals from a position of strength and can deal with them in love, disciplining them in a way she never could if she had to have their support.

We are this way in relation to food, as well. If I need food, I am not a servant of Christ. If I can get along without food, if I am willing to starve to death if necessary, then I can be a servant of Christ — and not until. This is the same thing exactly. Because, if I need food and I have to have it, then whoever controls my food controls me and I am not a servant of Christ; I am a servant of whoever controls my food. But I see that food is a small thing, and if I am a servant of Christ I could care less if I should die tomorrow. What a great blessing and relief that would be. Therefore, there is nothing in this world that I can afford to need as a servant of Christ except to obey my Lord, and He will see to it that I always have power to do that. There is no one in this universe who can stop me from doing that except Him. And He won’t. Therefore, I need not fear. I would be able to fulfill my mission and do what I need to do. If it is my lot to die tomorrow because nobody will give me food anymore, that’s fine–I don’t mind; and the same with any other need. He can’t afford to need anything that comes from beneath us in our stewardship.

Does that help make the concept clear? It is pretty strong medicine, I know, but I hope you will be sympathetic in your thinking and try to understand what I am saying because I honestly believe I am saying what is right. On the other hand, you cannot afford to merely believe; you have to find out for yourself whether it is right or not.

QUESTION: Weren’t there times in the Prophet Joseph Smith’s life when Emma did not support him?

Certainly there were times in the Prophet’s life when he did not get the support of his wife, yet that did not stop him from fulfilling his mission. If it had stopped him from fulfilling his mission he would not have been a servant of Christ. It is that simple.

QUESTION: (Not able to transcribe from the tape.)

I am glad you mentioned that. First of all, you have to have the foundation. The foundation is what we talked about yesterday. We have to be servants of Christ; we have to be responsible to Him in the spirit. Then one of the gifts of the spirit we will receive is the gift of love. And, if these relationships are worked out and perfected in a pure, self-sacrificing, long-suffering love, we have the pure charity that Paul talks about. It will work! If you try to work this out with some kind of hardnosed, puritanistic, businesslike arrangement, it will never work. It has to be done in love. I appreciate the question because this is certainly what I intended to convey.

QUESTION: When you say the gift of love, can you develop it or do you have to receive it as a gift?

The pure love that I am talking about is strictly a gift of the spirit. Nobody has it naturally. There are some people who are very kind and loving, but their love is not pure until they become servants of Christ and receive that pure gift.

What would you do when someone over you in authority is not a very good steward? They are abusing their stewardship. This becomes a real test because it is trying. And I have a very simple formula of what to do about it. This again is a little drastic so I hope you will bear with me.

Let me use an analogy. Supposing you had some books that were very valuable to you and you had them in a ten-cent cardboard box and the box was falling apart? What would you do? You would replace the box, so you could take care of the books, wouldn’t you? Supposing the box was filled with just excelsior and you didn’t care whether you had the excelsior or not, what would you do? Would you replace the box? I suppose you would let it stay as it is.

Let’s try a different example. Supposing there was a ward where the bishop was doing a very poor job. He was not a servant of the Lord; he was just riding high and mighty with his authority and powers, exercising unrighteous dominion. But supposing the people of the ward were very faithful members and tried to follow his leadership. What do you suppose the Lord would do with that bishop? Replace him! All right supposing the people of the ward under that same bishop were slothful and did not care what the bishop said; they would not do what he said anyway. What would the Lord do about that bishop? Probably nothing. Do you see why? If you have a bishop you think is wrong, what should you do? The best thing you can do is support him. Do everything he says to do as faithfully as you can. Now when you do that, if you and other members of that ward become faithful to that bishop and honor him in his priesthood, something powerful would happen to that bishop. Do you know what that would be? The Lord would begin to work upon that bishop and He would harrow up the soul of that man until he got into line, or he would be dismissed. That is the way it works.

I can bear you solemn testimony from my own experience as a bishop that when the people support you, if you aren’t doing what is right the Lord will allow you to go through hell. You will either shape up or He will get rid of you. It is that simple. But if the people aren’t doing what you say, you just go bungling along, you and the people, and it doesn’t matter, does it?

“QUESTION: What if you are told to do something you feel strongly against?”

I was once told by my bishop to stand by the door of the Church and physically throw out somebody if they came. That was hard for me to take. But I prayed about it and got confirmation that that was what I had to do. Fortunately they didn’t show up.

I guess I have been in that circumstance at least a dozen times where I was told by the presiding authority over me to do something important that I did not think was right. And in every case, when I have gone to the Lord, the Lord has said to do it. I admit there might be a circumstance where the Lord would say not to do it. But if that time every came I would immediately check with the authority over the person speaking to me and find if I were out of line or if they were out of line. I have surely wondered sometimes, but as I have sought the will of the Lord it has always been to support that man. So I believe that if a wife has a husband and she does not think he is a very good servant of the Lord, the best thing she can do is obey him implicitly as if he were perfect. Now that is pretty strong medicine, isn’t it? You see, that is her stewardship, and if she does that the Lord will get busy on him. When the Lord begins to work on him, He has marvelous ways to bring husbands around. But if the wife isn’t paying any attention to the husband anyway, and the husband isn’t very faithful and the wife wants the husband to get faithful so that she will have some point in being faithful, it will never come to pass. Well, I shouldn’t say that. She might implore the Lord to do something about it, but until she is faithful, her prayers will not be answered. That is the point.

“QUESTION: What about marriage outside the temple?”

They have no stewardship in marriage. Their marriage is not appointed of God and is not, strictly speaking in the Lord, a marriage. I am talking about temple marriage. When a woman accepts a man as her husband, she must be willing to accept him as the Lord. Now if she does not think enough of him, if he is not good ù enough, she had not better marry him. If he is not that grown up yet, if he is not a servant of God and able to speak for the Lord to her, and to be the blessing that she needs to fill her role as a wife and mother, she is jumping off a cliff to marry him. So, if young people would marry righteously most of this problem would be eliminated. If a woman doesn’t know this when she gets married, then what should she do? The solution generally is not to kick over the traces. The solution generally is to honor the covenants that have been made and to serve righteously and faithfully, as sweetly and as humbly as is possible. If the point comes where the Lord tells her that she ought to depart from him, she ought to go to her bishop, and if it is right he will get the same counsel. There again, she is going to the person who has stewardship in the matter. When she gets married in the first place, she ought to counsel vith him who has stewardship over her, namely her father. And, if a girl has a righteous father and can counsel with him and be assured both through the Spirit of the Lord and through her father that she is marrying a man of God who will lead her to exaltation, blessed is she. But I’m afraid some marriages are not made that way.

QUESTION: (Not heard)

As long as the Lord directs her to stay with him she ought to stay with him and be as faithful to him as she can be. Her own salvation rests not on what he does but on how faithful she is in fulfilling her stewardship. As I have looked in the Church, I have found one of the biggest problems active LDS couples are having is that the wife does not think the husband is very righteous and therefore won’t do what he says. This is a source of endless misery and grief. I simply believe that as long as the wife is bound by that covenant she will do the very best thing by herself, by the Lord, and by righteousness to faithfully obey her husband. This may be difficult, but nevertheless this is the kind of trial and faithfulness in stewardship by which we show we are worthy of exaltation. If a woman can serve faithfully under an evil man, some day she will be given a righteous man to be her head and her guide, if her husband rejects the opportunity. But I have seen marvelous transformations in brethren when their wives have been faithful, because then they have seen that there is really some point in being a servant of the Lord, then they have responsibility. When this man’s wife does everything he says, he gets a little bit scared lest he tell her the wrong thing to do. When he gets a little scared he gets on his knees and asks the Lord for help and becomes mighty and powerful. When his wife comes to him for blessings in the priesthood, he gets shaken up a bit and so repents of his sins and tries to be righteous. It is marvelous what can happen.

Remember, Lehi got a little out of line in the Book of Mormon. He began to rail against the Lord for the terrible afflictions they were having. What did his son Nephi do? He went to him and demanded that he act as a father. He said, “Father tell me where to go that we might have food.” Lehi was in no shape at all to get revelation from the Lord because he had been railing against Him. But he had to humble himself and pray to the Lord, and he got the revelation and fold Nephi where to go; and Nephi went and got the meat and they were saved.

This is a marvelous principle the principle of obedience in stewardship. If we can learn to live it, it is one of the great keys in establishing Zion. It is one thing we have not as a Church come to yet, but, if we will, it will move us a great stride forward to that goal.

QUESTION: (Not heard)

I would think that very clearly when the boys reach twelve years of age, they ought to come directly under their father’s stewardship and as priesthood bearers they ought to serve under him. This does not mean they won’t receive instruction from their mother, especially if the father is absent. And the father ought to teach the boys to have complete respect and reverence for their mother. Nevertheless, she needs to be careful and begin to treat them not as children anymore. She does not preside over them in exactly the same sense she did when they were little children.

QUESTION: (Not heard)

When a young man marries, his stewardship relationship to his father does not change one bit. When a young lady marries her stewardship relationship changes drastically. That is to say, she passes from the stewardship of her father to the stewardship of her husband. And that is why there should be agreement by all parties concerned with the stewardship — the Church, the father, and the groom — that this transfer is right.

Only through perfecting ourselves in these stewardship relationships in marriage can we ever have a faint hope for exaltation, because that is what exaltation is. It is the perfection of the marriage relationship. We are to become one in Christ — not two, but one. Christ is the head; we are the hands and the feet. We take our direction from Him. We are members of His body. In exactly the same sense as that relationship, the husband and wife must be one; the husband is the head and the wife the body, I suppose. And then they should function in perfect harmony of unity and love to accomplish the purposes of the family. The purpose of the family is the begetting and the rearing of children unto the Lord. And, if they by the Lord. Then they can act as one.

President McKay in this last conference instructed us as Latter-day Saints to see what we could do to get Section 121 operative in every stewardship in the world, not just Church stewardship, but civil stewardship as well, so that they operate on the basis not of force, but of persuasion and love.

Many people when they get a stewardship, as the scripture says, exert unrighteous dominion. They forget that the powers of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven. The powers of heaven through which the power of the priesthood becomes operative is the Holy Ghost, and, when any man or woman becomes unrighteous and exercises unrighteous dominion to gratify their pride and vain ambitions, the Spirit of the Lord is grieved and is withdrawn from them. Amen to their priesthood. They have lost their priesthood and authority. They may be able to get it back, but anything they do without it, they do so exercising unrighteous dominion. They are outside their stewardship. This is another very important principle we want to remember. We can act as stewards only under the direction of the Lord. If we try to do this of our own selves, of our own wisdom, we are only serving the adversary.

In conclusion, let me simply request you to please not take anything I have said as the final word. I am here to throw out some suggestions worthy of thought, worthy of prayer, and hope you will find them valuable in sensing a correct understanding of the relationship the Lord would have us come to. I bear you my testimony of the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ, and I feel with all my soul the importance and necessity of our making these relationships right in the Spirit of the Lord and in the power of the pure love of Christ; and I bear you this testimony in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

Posted in Education Week, Restored Gospel | Tagged | Comments Off on Stewardship

Stewardship: The Establishment of Zion

Chauncey C. Riddle
Campus Education Week Lectures
12 June 1968

Note: This is the version that Chauncey Riddle handed out in his BYU class.

The basis of establishing Zion is the perfecting of the souls of individuals. As individuals accept the gospel and live it, they become sanctified, which is to say, they are forgiven of their sins, or they are made holy, pure, and spotless. The two basic characteristics of such a person, I would take it, are:

(1) the fact that a person who comes to this state finds that prayer is his greatest asset and resource in his life. He lives by prayer, because through prayer, he gains the strength and help he needs to govern and direct his life according to the will of the Lord;

(2) this person is blessed by the abundance of the spirit of the Lord that is manifest in the gifts of the spirit.

Now there are many spirits and there are people who pray and get the wrong spirit. But as a person takes the time and the opportunity to make sure that he is following the right spirit this will not be a problem.

One of the important ways that we can know that we are not on the track, or have the wrong spirit, is that there is such a thing on the earth as priesthood. When we square in our views, our revelations, with the priesthood authority over us, then we have a right to believe that we are on the right track. Experience will bear this out.

But when a person finds himself going contrary to those who preside over him because of supposed revelation and he insists on believing it is from the Lord, he will go on to his sorrow to discover it is not so, because this is one of the plain, appointed checks the Lord has given that people need not be misled by the wiles of the adversary.

Once a person has understood the basis of the gospel, and has decided to embark on a life of service to the Lord Jesus Christ, a life of righteousness—that is to say, if a person has entered into a strait gate—then they must go along that narrow way and endure to the end. I believe the next big challenge they must face in their lives is to learn to live in the order of the priesthood. Now this is an almost overwhelming challenge. I say almost overwhelming because when we contemplate the greatness of this challenge, it begins to be overwhelming as we understand the importance and magnitude of the task.

We might approach the notion of learning to live in the priesthood order through the doctrine of stewardship.

Stewardship is being given a responsibility by someone where we do not have ownership or right to absolute dominion in our own right, but where we receive it as a charge from someone else who does. It is the nature of our existence that we are stewards. For instance, we do not own the bodies we inhabit. They are not ours. We did not create them; they were created by God and given to us as a stewardship, as a charge. We have been loaned them for the purpose of executing the will of the owner. Nevertheless, it is given unto us to have agency to defy the owner if we will. But, if that is the case, we must reap the consequences of that defiance.

We are given our minds as stewardships. The mind we have is a mind somewhat like the mind of God, except that it is very small, infantile, compared to the adult. Nevertheless, we have intelligence given to us that we can think and act and create and move and accomplish; and also destroy, hurt do evil things according to our own will. But we are given specific instructions by our Maker as to how to use this mind—what to take into it, what to believe, on what basis we should make our decisions.

The talents we might have, whatever they might be, the money we have, the property we might have—everything which the world counts as being in our discretionary power is really not ours. It is only a stewardship from the Lord.

Many people of this world, of course, do not believe in this stewardship, nor accept it. When a person is baptized as a member of this Church, however, this is one thing that they accomplish. They accept the Lord as the owner and governor of all things, and acknowledge themselves as stewards. They take upon themselves the name of Christ, not willing to be known simply as themselves. The important name they bear henceforth is not their own name but the name of their Master, Jesus Christ. They promise that henceforth they will not do their own will, but do His will to keep all of the commandments which He gives unto them. They promise from henceforth that they will not neglect this stewardship, but will remember the Master always, that they might receive His instruction constantly, and be faithful and wise stewards in executing their charge.

Doctrine and Covenants, Section 104, elaborates on this idea. Beginning with verse 11, the Lord says:

It is wisdom in me; therefore, a commandment I give unto you, that ye shall organize yourselves and appoint every man his stewardship; That every man may give an account unto me of the stewardship which is appointed unto him, (DC 104:11–12.)

This, of course, is a very necessary and important part of having been given a stewardship; namely, that we may be called at any moment to account for the stewardship. If we have been doing faithfully and well according to the instructions given by the Master, there will be no regrets. If we have been slothful, if we have procrastinated obedience to the commandments, or if we have been doing our own will instead, then there is considerable reason to fear the presence of the Master.

The scriptures commend to us that if we keep the commandments of the gospel, our confidence shall wax strong in the presence of the Lord, which is simply another way of saying we will be delighted to see Him come at any time to receive accounting of our stewardship. But if we are not ready to give an account of our stewardship, if we cannot say, “Lord, I have faithfully fulfilled Thy will in all things,” it simply means we have not yet fully applied the gospel in our lives.

One of the tests, then, as to whether the gospel is our way of life is if we are ready to account to our Master at any time. Each day is sufficient to its own problems and if we live each day as the Lord would have us do, there would never be a moment of any day when we would not be ready to make that accounting.

For it is expedient that I, the Lord, should make every man accountable, as a steward over earthly blessings, which I have made and prepared for my creatures. I, the Lord, stretched out the heavens, and built the earth, my very handiwork; and all things therein are mine. And it is my purpose to provide for my saints, for all things are mine.

I, the Lord, stretched out the heavens, and built the earth, my very handiwork; and all things therein are mine.

And it is my purpose to provide for my saints, for all things are mine, [All things, in heaven and in earth.]

But it must needs be done in mine own way; and behold this is the way that I, the Lord, have decreed to provide for my saints, that the poor shall be exalted, in that the rich are made low. [Not by force, but by the doctrine of stewardship,]

For the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare; yea, I prepared all things, and have given unto the children of men to be agents unto themselves.

We keep hearing about the fact that there is a terrible famine imminent, that the world is about to be overpopulated, or perhaps is now. But these statements are all made by people who know not God. If we understand the nature and the work of God, He has plenty to spare for each of His children. The only reason there ever has been famine on the earth or difficulty or trouble for the children of God is the fact that they have rejected their Maker. They have not been willing to account to Him who is the owner and master of all things. They have not been willing to be stewards. Had they been willing there would have been abundance for all.

Therefore, if any man shall take of the abundance which I have made, and impart not his portion, according to the law of my gospel, unto the poor and the needy, he shall, with the wicked, lift up his eyes in hell, being in torment, (DC 104:13–18, Italics added.)

Now this particular section relates specifically to the law of consecration practiced in the Church in the early days, but the general principle of stewardship is also there. Let’s read on a little bit in the last part of this section, beginning with verse 54:

And again, a commandment I give unto you concerning your stewardship which I have appointed unto you, Behold all these properties are mine, or else your faith is vain [if there is anything we think we own that does not belong to the Lord Jesus Christ, that simply means that we do not have faith in Him, that He is not our Master, we have not really made the covenant with Him], and ye are found hypocrites, and the covenants which ye have made unto me are broken; And if the properties are mine, then ye are stewards; otherwise ye are not stewards, But, verily I say unto you, I have appointed unto you to be stewards over mine house, even stewards indeed, (DC 104:54–57, Italics added,)

There are some wonderful things about a stewardship. One of the greatest blessings of being a steward for Christ is that we are responsible only for our stewardship. We are not responsible for things that lie outside the boundaries. For instance, supposing we think of our stewardship as a plot of ground. We are not responsible for what goes on anywhere in the world except within the limits of that plot which the Lord has designated as our stewardship. If we are faithful in that stewardship, the Lord might give us a supervisory stewardship not only over our plot but over some of our neighbor’s and their plots, too. And then it will be our great opportunity to be in the chain that blesses these stewards; that is to say, to help them be good stewards in their own area, but we never have to worry about anything except exactly that which the Lord has designated as the boundary of our responsibility. It is not necessary for us to go off dashing throughout the world solving all the world’s problems. We can’t do it anyway. But we can solve the problems of our own stewardship.

Satan, of course, is active in this situation, trying to get people to neglect the matters of their own stewardships and to try to go about solving the problems of other people’s stewardships. By that means he can thoroughly mess up the world. Sometimes we have difficulty getting revelation for our own stewardship, but almost always we think we see clearly what our neighbor should do about his stewardship. But it is important to pause. If we don’t see clearly what we ought to do about our own problem, that will be because we lack the spirit of the Lord, right? And if we lack the spirit of the Lord for our own stewardship, would the Lord ever give us revelation for our neighbor’s stewardship? Obviously not. So if we think we see clearly how to solve our neighbor’s problems and we can’t solve our own, who is telling us how to solve our neighbor’s problems? It obviously is Satan. And he delights to do this. So he goes around fouling up the lines of stewardship changing the markers so that people don’t know where they belong. And so they get out of bounds.

There is a very classic example of this that has influenced people’s thinking and is one of the most misinterpreted circumstances in scripture; this relates to the story of Cain. Cain killed Abel and then the Lord came to Cain and said, “Where is Abel, thy brother?” Cain retorted. “How should I know? Am I my brother’s keeper?” Ordinarily the correct answer to Cain’s question is what? No. The plain answer is that Cain was never given to be Abel’s keeper. A brother is never a keeper. But nevertheless, by taking Abel’s life, Cain had stepped out of his stewardship and had usurped the stewardship of God Himself. He arrogated to himself to be Abel’s keeper. So it is quite appropriate the Lord should come and ask Cain, where Abel was, because Cain had taken it upon himself to become Abel’s keeper, but wrongfully. Cain tried to get out of it by pleading innocence and ignorance of the situation by going back to the standard law that he was not Abel’s keeper. Then the Lord, of course, reminded him that He knew all things by saying, “Thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.” And then Cain started to make lame excuses as to why he had usurped this stewardship.

But you see, it is an interesting thing that Satan has been able to take this little story and ever since then most Christians, most people who read the Bible, have thought they ought to be their brother’s keeper when it was never given it to be that way. Possibly by this little technique more damage has been done in the world than by any other device, because people take this story and say, “Well, I need to be my brother’s keeper,” so they go out of their stewardship and over to their brother’s yard and start fixing up his problems—not by the revelation of God, but by the revelation of Satan.

Every tyrant since the world began has simply been his brother’s keeper. He has been solving problems for his brother that his brother couldn’t solve for himself. If you look in the history books, almost every ruler who has taken great power to himself has done it under the guise of blessing his brothers, whom (he thought) knew not how to take care of themselves. He who had some special gift or insight and was going to bless them and take care of them because they were not wise enough. And 1968 is no different from the time of Stalin or the time of Caesar, or going back to the first tyrant, who was Cain.

You see, it is the same story ever since the beginning of stepping out of the stewardship and trying to solve problems and fix things. If humanity could learn this one lesson, it would go a great way toward solving the problems of humanity. If every man would learn to worry about his own problems and not try to mess up someone else’s life and stewardship, it would greatly free humanity. But apparently we haven’t learned that yet. And so throughout the world we have a continuing series of attempts on the part of people who think they know best how to enlighten the minds of others and to “save” them.

What is a “keeper”? If you lived in a zoo and you had a keeper, what would you have? Somebody who fed you, who closed the gates on you and opened the gates when he wanted to. He would be your master. A keeper is a master. He is the one who calls the shots, who gives the orders, who says what goes on. It was never given in this world that any man should be his brother’s master. Now it is given to some to be masters. But brothers are supposed to treat brothers as brothers and not as masters. A proper relationship of brother to brother is to live together and bear one another’s burdens, which is what Alma says: When my brother suffers, I should go suffer with him. When he rejoices, I should rejoice with him. (Mosiah 18:8–9.)

But I am not to tell him what to do. I am not to instruct him or to chastise him or tell him where to get off. There will be people who will be sent to do that. And they will be masters or keepers. But they will have a specifically appointed stewardship to do that given by the Lord Himself. But it was never appointed that any brother should go around pointing out his brother’s faults to him.

If your brother has a problem, do you go talk to him about it and try to tell him what to do? That is exactly the temptation I am talking about! If the Lord won’t give you revelation for your stewardship, will He for someone else’s stewardship? Now suppose yougo to a friend of yours and say, “I have a problem. Will you help me with this?” What are you doing in that circumstance? You are letting that person be your keeper, temporarily.You are yielding to them a stewardship to counsel you, and in that circumstance, if they are wise they might be able to help you a great deal. If someone asks you for help, then, indeed, it might be perfectly appropriate for you to help. But suppose they don’t ask? Would you, then—nevertheless—give your counsel? If you did, you see, you would be overstepping the bounds of your stewardship.

Who are keepers? Fathers and mothers are keepers. Bishops, stake presidents, general authorities—they are keepers. They have specifically appointed responsibilities and authority over the people over whom they preside. But they cannot get outside that stewardship and do any good! If a stake president goes from one stake into another stake and tries to preside, he does nothing but create havoc!

This is how the Lord orders his kingdom. This is one of the reasons I am talking about this subject. We need to learn the order of priesthood. And until we learn the order of priesthood and learn to live in it—both up and down the line—to honor those who are above us, to respect the stewardship we have below us and faithfully execute our duties, we cannot be Zion. It is not enough for us to be a good person by ourselves. We have to learn to live together in an harmonious arrangement, but the only way that the arrangements can be harmonious is if it is a God-ordered arrangement. This is the purpose of priesthood and stewardship; that everybody will know what his lines of authority are and what his area of responsibility is. Then we don’t get all messed up by doing things that are not appropriate. The Lord’s kingdom is a kingdom of order, and this is the order that we are talking about.

I suppose that much unhappiness and misery has come out of the problem of stewardship between husband and wife with people who are trying to live the gospel as with any other one things. And so I would like to make some suggestions on this which I hope will be helpful in living this relationship.

Basically, there are three stewardship relationships that we have to any human being in the world. For any human being we are either their father or their mother, we are their brother or their sister, or we are their son or their daughter. These are the basic interpersonal relationships that exist between people. Can you think of any relationship that does not fit one of those three?

Now the question: which one of these relationships is the husband-wife relationship? Is it a brother-sister relationship? The answer is no. It never was and never will be intended to be a brother-sister relationship. What relationship is it? It is a father-daughter relationship. All that I am saying is that it is a father-daughter relationship in that the husband presides over the wife and the wife does not preside over the husband. The husband’s stewardship includes the wife, but the wife’s stewardship does not include the husband. Therefore it is a father-daughter relationship in the priesthood.

Because this stewardship relationship is not understood, a great deal of difficulty arises when people try to relate to each other. If people would listen when they take their temple covenants, they would perhaps understand more. But many do not listen and therefore they do not understand how this relationship works.

Any time we have a father or mother relationship with someone, that is, if we preside over them in the authority of the priest hood, our priesthood responsibility is to be instruments in the hands of the Lord to administer His blessings to them. This means to help them to develop as strong, righteous individuals. Whatever it takes to help them develop and grow as strong, righteous individuals—that is the responsibility of one who presides in the priesthood. It is not to dominate, it is not to govern in the usual sense!’ but it is to be a resource of information, of strength, of power, of courage. Whatever is needed that the person cannot furnish himself, he should be able to go to the person over him and get because that person has gone to the Lord and has received. If he cannot get it from that person than he will have to go higher.

God is not slack. God is good, and therefore we all know that we will get what we need if we go higher. But, you see, the people in between will lose their blessings if they don’t give us what we need. And therefore, each of us works at our salvation in part by learning to be a good steward and to be an administrator of good things.

When the Lord comes in the second coming and He finds His steward giving meat in due season, He has found a wise and faithful steward. What does that mean? It simply means this steward is measuring out the blessings of the Lord and giving those in his stewardship what they need when they need it as they need it. That’s the due season—so they can grow, so that they can be nourished spiritually, physically, socially—whatever it takes.

Now the power of God is sufficient for all the needs of human beings, and if we would live under the order of God we would need nothing but the government of God for the perfection of our souls. It would suffice for every need that we have.

The role of the husband, then, is to be a reservoir of God’s goodness, a source of everything that she would need that she cannot herself supply to fulfill her stewardship.

What is her stewardship? Her stewardship is to be a reservoir of God’s goodness, a source, a help, to bless her children. It is the role of the wife to bring children into this world, to bear the souls of men, and to teach them and nurture them. And whatever she needs that she cannot supply herself she should go to her husband to get it. If her children are sick and she cannot heal them with herbs or whatever knowledge and power she has, she should go to her husband and ask of him that his priesthood might be invoked to heal these children. If she needs knowledge as to how to handle them in difficult psychological circumstances, she has the right to go to him and seek counsel as to what she ought to do.

He can fulfill his role only if he is a man of God, only if he is on good enough terms with the Lord so that he, in turn, can go to the Lord and say, “Lord, please tell me what to tell my wife.” Or if he can go to the Lord and say, “Lord, I need power to give this blessing.” If he is a righteous man, the Lord is not slack. He will give the power and the blessing will be delivered, and the mother will be satisfied that her stewardship, then, is in good order. Likewise, the children have a right to go to their mother and to their father to receive the blessings they need. It seems that before we can perfect ourselves in these relationships we must become so strong in the power of the Lord in righteousness that we will never need anything from anybody beneath us in our stewardship. If we have need of something, we always go up the line to get the need fulfilled.

Now let me be specific. When a man becomes what he ought to be as a man of God, he will never need the support of his wife. This doesn’t mean he wouldn’t enjoy it if he had it. But if she chooses not to support him, not to comfort him, not to sustain him, he needs to be able to get along without it. He has to be that strong. It can be a great blessing to him to have that comfort, but he must not need it. The Lord is in that relationship to us. The Lord cannot afford to need you and me. If He did, then we would be boss. We would be lord, if He needed us. Now He is grateful when we are obedient, and when we do the work we are supposed to do we build His kingdom. But He does not need us. If we choose to go on our way and defy Him, He can get along quite nicely without us. He may not have as much glory; He may not be as happy. But He will never have to come begging to us something. He is not in that position.

Similarly, we need to be in that position in the priesthood authority—to delight in receiving support from the meek but never needing it. Again, have you seen others who so desperately needed their children that they will give their children whatever their children want and thereby destroy their children? But if the mother does not need those children, if the mother is secure enough in her relationship with her husband, and on up the line with the Lord, that she doesn’t need the children, then she is in the position to do the very best job with the children that is possible. If the children defy her, she doesn’t have to get on her knees and plead with them to do something. Then she deals from a position of strength. She can deal with them and bless them and discipline them in a way she never could if she had to have their help or their support.

A servant of God is this way in relation to food, for instance. If I need food, then I am not a servant of Christ. If I can get along without food, if I am willing to starve to death, if necessary, then I can be a servant of Christ, but not until then. Because if I need food and I have to have it, then whoever controls my food controls me. And I am not a servant of Christ. I am a servant of whoever controls my food.

Food is a small thing. If I am a servant of Christ, I could care less if I should die tomorrow. What a great blessing and relief that would be. There is nothing in this world that I can afford to need as a servant of Christ except to obey my Lord. And He will see to it that I always have power to do that. There is no one in this universe that can stop me from doing that except Him, and He won’t. Therefore, I need not fear. I will be able to fill my mission and do what I need to do. And if it is my calling to die tomorrow because nobody would give me food anymore, that’s fine. I must not mind.

The same with any other need. We cannot afford to need anything that comes from beneath us in our stewardship. Now, that is pretty strong medicine, I know. But I hope you will, as I said, be sympathetic: in taking it, and you will try to understand what I am saying, because I honestly believe what I am saying is right. On the other hand, you can’t afford to believe me. You have to find out for yourself whether it is right or not.

There were times in the Prophet’s life [Joseph Smith] when he didn’t get the support of his wife. And yet that didn’t stop him from fulfilling his mission. If it had stopped him from fulfilling his mission, he would not have been a servant of Christ. It is that simple.

How can we gain the strength to do this? First of all we must obtain the foundation for being servants of Christ. We have to be servants of Christ: we have to be responsive to Him in the spirit. Then, one of the gifts of the spirit that we will receive is the gift of love. And if these relationships are worked out and perfected in a pure, self-sacrificing, long-suffering love—the pure charity that Paul talks about—it will work. If you try to work this on a hardnosed, puritanistic, business-like arrangement, it will never work. It has to be done in love.

The pure love that I am talking about is strictly a gift of the spirit. Nobody has it naturally. There are some people who are very kind and loving, but their love is not pure until they become servants of Christ and receive that pure gift.

What would you do when somebody over you in authority is not a very good steward? Suppose they are abusing their stewardship. This becomes a real test; this becomes a trial. And I have a very simple formula as to what to do about it. This again is a little drastic: so I hope you will bear with me.

Let me use an analogy. Suppose you had some books that were very valuable to you. You had them in a ten cent box and the box was falling apart. What would you do? You would replace the box wouldn’t you so that you could take care of the books? Suppose that the box was just filled with excelsior—and you didn’t care whether you had the excelsior or not—what would you do? Would you replace the box? Probably not. You would probably let it stay as it is.

All right, now let’s try a different level. Suppose there was a ward where there was a bishop and the bishop was doing a very poor job. He wasn’t a servant of the Lord; he was just riding high and mighty in his authority and power exercising unrighteous dominion. But, suppose the people of the ward were very faithful people and they tried to follow his leadership. What do you suppose the Lord would do to that bishop? He would replace him. On the other hand suppose that the people under the same bishop were slothful and didn’t care what the bishop said; they didn’t do what the bishop said anyway. What would the Lord do about that bishop? Probably nothing. Do you see why?

If you have a bishop you think is wrong, what is the best thing you can do to help that bishop? The best thing you can do is to support him. Do everything he says to do as faithfully as you can. Now, when you do that, if you and the other members of the ward became faithful to that bishop and honored him in his priesthood something powerful would happen to that bishop. Do you have any idea what it would be? The Lord would begin to work upon that bishop, and he would harrow up the soul of that man until he either got in line or He (the Lord) would get rid of him. That is the way it works. But remember there are limits. No person has to follow any bishop to hell. It is within the stewardship of each ward member to be able to inquire of the Lord to find out how and how far to follow that bishop.

But if the people aren’t doing what you say, as the bishop you just go on bumbling along—you, and the people, all the same. It doesn’t then matter, does it?

What is your conscience? It is the spirit of the Lord. I was told by my bishop once to stand at the door of the church and physically throw out a certain person if that person came. That was hard for me to take. But I prayed about it and I got confirmation. Yes, that is what I ought to do. Fortunately, the person didn’t show up.

I have been in that circumstance at least a dozen times, where there was something very important that I was told to do by the presiding authority over me that I didn’t think was right. In every case, when I have gone to the Lord, the Lord has said to do it. Now, I admit, there might be a circumstance where He might say don’t do it. But, if that ever came I would immediately check with the authority over the person speaking to me to find out if I was out of line or if the one I was questioning was out of line. I never yet have been told to go against an authority in the Church, although I have surely wondered sometimes. But as I have sought the will of the Lord the always has been to support that man.

So I believe if a wife has a husband and she doesn’t think he is a very good servant of the Lord, the best thing she can do is to go to the Lord. The Lord will probably say for her to obey him as if he were perfect. That is pretty strong medicine. But that is her stewardship. And if she does that, the Lord is going to get busy on him. The Lord will begin to work on him. The Lord has marvelous ways to bring husbands around. But if the wife isn’t paying any attention to the husband anyway, and the husband isn’t very faithful, and the wife wants the husband to get faithful so that she will have some point in being faithful, it probably will never come to pass.

All of this, of course, pertains to people married in the temple. I am not talking about any other circumstance, because unless people are married in the temple they have no stewardship in marriage. That is to say, their marriage is not appointed of God and is not, strictly speaking in the eyes of the Lord, a marriage.

No woman has to follow any man to hell. You see, the crux of the matter is this. When a girl accepts a man as her husband, she must be willing to accept him as the lord. Now, if she doesn’t think enough of him, if he isn’t that good, she hadn’t better marry him. If he isn’t that grown up yet that he is a servant of God and able to speak for the Lord to her and to be the source of blessing that she needs to fill her role as a wife and mother, she is jumping off the cliff to marry him. If young people would get married right, you see, most of this problem would be eliminated.

Supposing they are already married and she didn’t know this before she got married. Then, what does she do? The solution, generally, is to honor the covenant that has been made, and to serve as righteously and as faithfully, as sweetly and as humbly, as is possible.

If the point comes where the Lord tells her that she ought to depart from him, she can go to her bishop, and if that is right, he will get the same counsel. And there again she is going to those who have stewardship over the matter.

When she gets married in the first place, she ought to counsel with those who have stewardship over her, namely her father and mother. And if a girl has a righteous father and mother and can counsel with them and be assured, both through the spirit of the Lord and through her parents, that she is marrying a man of God who will lead her to exaltation, blessed is she. But I am afraid some marriages aren’t made that way.

How long should a wife endure an unhappy marriage? As long as the Lord directs her to stay with him. She ought to stay with him and be as faithful to him as she can be. Her own salvation rests not on what he does but on how faithful she is in fulfilling her stewardship.

As I have watched couples recently in the Church, I find that one of the biggest problems that active LDS couples are having is that the wife doesn’t think the husband is very righteous and therefore she won’t do what he says. This is the source of endless misery and grief. I believe that as long as the wife is bound by the temple covenant she will do the very best thing by the Lord and by righteousness to obey her husband faithfully. This may be difficult. But, nevertheless, this is the kind of trial and faithfulness in stewardship by which we show that we are worthy of exaltation. If a woman can serve faithfully under an evil man, she surely has demonstrated she can serve faithfully under a righteous man, and some day she will be given a righteous man to be her head and her guide if her husband rejects the opportunity. But I have seen marvelous transformations in brethren when their wives have been faithful. The brethren have seen that there is really some point in being a servant of the Lord, because they have responsibility. When their wife does everything they say, they get a little bit scared lest they tell their wife the wrong thing to do. And being a little bit scared, they get on their knees and ask the Lord, and then they try to become righteous, then mighty and powerful. When their wives come to them for blessings in the priesthood they get shaken up a little bit. So they repent of their sins and try to be righteous. It is marvelous what can happen.

Lehi got a little out of line in the Book of Mormon, and he began to rear up against the Lord for the terrible afflictions they were having. So what did Nephi do? He went to Lehi and asked that he act as the father. He said, “Father, tell me where to go that we might have food?”

Lehi was in no shape to get revelation at all because he had been railing against the Lord, but he had to humble himself and pray to the Lord. He received revelation and he told Nephi where to go and Nephi went and got the meat and they were saved.

Now this is a marvelous principle; the principle of obedience in stewardship. If we can learn to live it, it is one of the great keys in the establishment of Zion.

When a young man marries, his stewardship relationship to his father doesn’t change one bit. When a young lady marries, her stewardship relationship changes drastically. That is to say, she passes from the stewardship of her father to the stewardship of her husband. And that is why there should be agreement by all parties concerned in the stewardship—by the Church, by the father and mother, by the groom, and, of course, on the part of the girl, herself—that this transfer is all right.

The more I learn about marriage the more I see the importance of knowing what we are getting into. Only through perfecting ourselves in these stewardship relationships in marriage can we ever have a faint hope for exaltation. Exaltation is the perfection of the marriage relationship.

We are to become one with Christ—not two, but one. But Christ is the head. We are the hands and the feet. We take our direction from him. We are members of His body. In exactly the same sense as that relationship, the husband and the wife must be one—the husband the head and the wife the body, as it were—but they should function in perfect harmony and unity and love to accomplish the purposes of the family.

Now the purpose of the family is the begetting and rearing of children unto the Lord. If the parents are together, if they are completely united in that particular goal, then they will be greatly blessed by the Lord in executing that task, and they can act as one.

There are also stewardships in political matters. If we have political stewardship, then we become bound as servants of Christ to do His will in that stewardship. President McKay has instructed us as Latter-day Saints to do what we could do to get the principles of Section 121 operative in every stewardship in the world, not just the Church stewardships but the civil stewardships as well. The point is not to operate on the basis of force, but on the basis of persuasion and kindness and love.

When many people get a stewardship, they assume unrighteous dominion; they forget that the powers of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven. The power of heaven through which the power of the priesthood becomes operative is the Holy Ghost, and when any man becomes unrighteous or any woman becomes unrighteous and exercises unrighteous dominion and if they seek to cover their sins and gratify their pride and their vain ambitions, the spirit of the Lord is grieved. And when it is withdrawn from them, amen to their priesthood. They have lost their priesthood and authority. They might be able to get it back, but in anything they do without it, they are exercising unrighteous dominion, they are outside their stewardship, which is another very important thing we want to remember. We can act as stewards only under the direction of the Lord. If we try to do this by ourselves, through our own wisdom, we are simply serving the adversary, which is to say, we have broken the lines of stewardship.

In conclusion, let me simply say, will you please not take anything I have said as the final word. I am here to throw out suggestions to you, but I hope you will find the suggestions worthy of thought and prayer. I hope you will find them valuable in the sense of correct understanding of the relationship the Lord would have us come into.

I bear you my testimony of the truthfulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ. And I feel with all my soul the importance and necessity of our making these relationships right in the spirit of the Lord, in the power of the pure love of Christ. And I bear you this testimony in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.

Posted in Class Notes, Education Week, Philosophy, Restored Gospel | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Stewardship: The Establishment of Zion